Suppr超能文献

将孕妇合理纳入临床试验:一种科学与伦理相结合的方法。

Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach.

作者信息

van der Graaf Rieke, van der Zande Indira S E, den Ruijter Hester M, Oudijk Martijn A, van Delden Johannes J M, Oude Rengerink Katrien, Groenwold Rolf H H

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2402-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since pregnant women are severely underrepresented in clinical research, many take the position that the exclusion of pregnant women from research must be justified unless there are compelling "scientific reasons" for their exclusion. However, it is questionable whether this approach renders research with pregnant women fair. This paper analyzes and evaluates when research with pregnant women can be considered as fair and what constitutes scientific reasons for exclusion.

METHODS

Conceptual ethical and methodological analysis and evaluation of fair inclusion.

RESULTS

Fair inclusion of pregnant women means (1) that pregnant women who are eligible are not excluded solely for being pregnant and (2) that the research interests of pregnant women are prioritized, meaning that they ought to receive substantially more attention. Fairness does not imply that pregnant women should be included in virtually every research project, as including only a few pregnant women in a population consisting only of women will not help to determine the effectiveness and safety of a treatment in pregnant women. Separate trials in pregnant women may be preferable once we assume, or know, that effects of interventions in pregnant women differ from the effects in other subpopulations, or when we assume, or know, that there are no differences. In the latter case, it may be preferable to conduct post-marketing studies or establish registries. If there is no conclusive evidence indicating either differences or equivalence of effects between pregnant and non-pregnant women, yet it seems unlikely that major differences or exact equivalence exist, the inclusion of pregnant women should be sufficient. Depending on the research question, this boils down to representativeness in terms of the proportion of pregnant and non-pregnant women, or to oversampling pregnant women.

CONCLUSIONS

Fair inclusion of pregnant women in research implies that separate trials in pregnant women should be promoted. Inclusion of pregnant women has to be realized at the earliest phases of the research process. In addition to researchers and research ethics committees, scientific advisory councils, funders, drug regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, journal editors and others have a joint responsibility to further develop the evidence base for drug use in pregnant women.

摘要

背景

由于孕妇在临床研究中的代表性严重不足,许多人认为,除非有令人信服的“科学理由”将孕妇排除在外,否则将孕妇排除在研究之外必须有正当理由。然而,这种方法是否能使针对孕妇的研究变得公平,这是值得怀疑的。本文分析并评估了何时针对孕妇的研究可被视为公平,以及构成排除孕妇的科学理由是什么。

方法

对公平纳入进行概念性伦理和方法学分析与评估。

结果

公平纳入孕妇意味着:(1)符合条件的孕妇不会仅仅因为怀孕而被排除;(2)孕妇的研究利益被置于优先地位,即她们应该得到更多得多的关注。公平并不意味着孕妇应该几乎被纳入每一个研究项目,因为在仅由女性组成的人群中只纳入少数孕妇无助于确定某种治疗方法对孕妇的有效性和安全性。一旦我们假设或知道干预措施对孕妇的影响与对其他亚人群的影响不同,或者当我们假设或知道没有差异时,针对孕妇进行单独试验可能更可取。在后一种情况下,进行上市后研究或建立登记处可能更可取。如果没有确凿证据表明孕妇和非孕妇之间的效应存在差异或等效性,但似乎不太可能存在重大差异或完全等效性,那么纳入孕妇就应该足够了。根据研究问题,这归结为孕妇和非孕妇比例方面的代表性,或者对孕妇进行过度抽样。

结论

公平地将孕妇纳入研究意味着应推动针对孕妇的单独试验。必须在研究过程的最早阶段就实现孕妇的纳入。除了研究人员和研究伦理委员会之外,科学咨询委员会、资助者、药品监管机构、制药公司、期刊编辑及其他各方有共同责任进一步发展孕妇用药的证据基础。

相似文献

4
Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research.孕妇在临床研究中的脆弱性。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):657-663. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103955. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Ethics and Medical Toxicology Research.伦理与医学毒理学研究
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Sep;13(3):255-258. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0618-4. Epub 2017 May 24.
9
Consent in clinical trials: what do patients know?临床试验中的知情同意:患者知道什么?
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):443-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 10.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Designing drug trials: considerations for pregnant women.设计药物试验:针对孕妇的考量因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;59 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S437-44. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu709.
6
Obstetric Pharmacokinetic Dosing Studies are Urgently Needed.急需产科药代动力学给药研究。
Front Pediatr. 2014 Feb 11;2:9. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00009. eCollection 2014.
9
Enrolling pregnant women: issues in clinical research.招募孕妇:临床研究中的问题。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 Jan;23(1):e39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.10.003.
10
Clinical research enrolling pregnant women: a workshop summary.临床招募孕妇的研究:研讨会总结。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Oct;20(10):1429-32. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.3118. Epub 2011 Aug 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验