Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SE-416 50, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Trials. 2019 Nov 19;20(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3765-x.
An important prerequisite for optimal healthcare is a secure, safe and comfortable environment. There is little research on how the physical design of birthing rooms affects labour, birth, childbirth experiences and birthing costs. This protocol outlines the design of a randomised controlled superiority trial (RCT) measuring and comparing effects and experiences of two types of birthing rooms, conducted in one labour ward in Sweden.
METHODS/DESIGN: Following ethics approval, a study design was developed and tested for feasibility in a pilot study, which led to some important improvements for conducting the study. The main RCT started January 2019 and includes nulliparous women presenting to the labour ward in active, spontaneous labour and who understand either Swedish, Arabic, Somali or English. Those who consent are randomised on a 1:1 ratio to receive care either in a regular room (control group) or in a newly built birthing room designed with a person-centred approach and physical aspects (such as light, silencer, media installation offering programmed nature scenes with sound, bathtub, birth support tools) that are changeable according to a woman's wishes (intervention group). The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite score of four outcomes: no use of oxytocin for augmentation of labour; spontaneous vaginal births (i.e. no vaginal instrumental birth or caesarean section); normal postpartum blood loss (i.e. bleeding < 1000 ml); and a positive overall childbirth experience (7-10 on a scale of 1-10). To detect a difference in the composite score of 8% between the groups we need 1274 study participants (power of 80% with significance level 0.05). Secondary outcomes include: the four variables in the primary outcome; other physical outcomes of labour and birth; women's self-reported experiences (the birthing room, childbirth, fear of childbirth, health-related quality of life); and measurement of costs in relation to the hospital stay for mother and neonate. Additionally, an ethnographic study with participant observations will be conducted in both types of birthing rooms.
The findings aim to guide the design of birthing rooms that contribute to optimal quality of hospital-based maternity care.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03948815. Registered 13 May 2019-retrospectively registered.
提供安全、舒适的环境是实现优质医疗保健的重要前提。然而,关于产房的物理设计如何影响分娩、生产、分娩体验和分娩成本,相关研究甚少。本研究方案概述了一项随机对照优势试验(RCT)的设计,旨在测量和比较瑞典某家产科病房两种类型产房的效果和体验。
方法/设计:本研究经伦理批准后开展,并在预试验中对研究设计进行了测试和可行性评估,这为研究的实施提供了重要改进。主要 RCT 于 2019 年 1 月启动,纳入初产妇,纳入标准为:在活跃、自发性分娩时进入产房,且能理解瑞典语、阿拉伯语、索马里语或英语。愿意参加的产妇将以 1:1 的比例随机分配至普通病房(对照组)或新建成的、以人性化为设计理念的产房(干预组),产房的物理设计可根据产妇的意愿进行调整(例如,灯光、消音器、播放带有声音的自然场景的媒体装置、浴盆、分娩支持工具等)。主要疗效终点是四个结局的综合评分:催产素使用率(用于增加产力)为零;自然阴道分娩(即无阴道器械助产或剖宫产);产后正常出血量(即出血<1000ml);以及积极的整体分娩体验(评分 1-10 分,得分为 7-10 分)。我们需要纳入 1274 名研究参与者(80%的效力,显著性水平为 0.05),才能检测出两组之间综合评分 8%的差异。次要结局包括:主要结局中的四个变量;分娩和生产的其他生理结局;女性的自我报告体验(产房、分娩、分娩恐惧、健康相关生活质量);以及与母婴住院费用相关的测量。此外,还将在两种类型的产房开展参与式观察的民族志研究。
研究结果旨在为设计有助于提高医院产科护理质量的产房提供指导。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03948815。2019 年 5 月 13 日注册-回顾性注册。