Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, the University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;25(2):321-338. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0585-z. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Leading biological hypotheses propose that biological changes may underlie major depressive disorder onset and relapse/recurrence. Here, we investigate if there is prospective evidence for biomarkers derived from leading theories. We focus on neuroimaging, gastrointestinal factors, immunology, neurotrophic factors, neurotransmitters, hormones, and oxidative stress. Searches were performed in Pubmed, Embase and PsychInfo for articles published up to 06/2019. References and citations of included articles were screened to identify additional articles. Inclusion criteria were having an MDD diagnosis as outcome, a biomarker as predictor, and prospective design search terms were formulated accordingly. PRISMA guidelines were applied. Meta-analyses were performed using a random effect model when three or more comparable studies were identified, using a random effect model. Our search resulted in 67,464 articles, of which 75 prospective articles were identified on: Neuroimaging (N = 24), Gastrointestinal factors (N = 1), Immunology (N = 8), Neurotrophic (N = 2), Neurotransmitters (N = 1), Hormones (N = 39), Oxidative stress (N = 1). Meta-analyses on brain volumes and immunology markers were not significant. Only cortisol (N = 19, OR = 1.294, p = 0.024) showed a predictive effect on onset/relapse/recurrence of MDD, but not on time until MDD onset/relapse/recurrence. However, this effect disappeared when studies including participants with a baseline clinical diagnosis were removed from the analyses. Other studies were too heterogeneous to compare. Thus, there is a lack of evidence for leading biological theories for onset and maintenance of depression. Only cortisol was identified as potential predictor for MDD, but results are influenced by the disease state. High-quality (prospective) studies on MDD are needed to disentangle the etiology and maintenance of MDD.
主要的生物学假说提出,生物学变化可能是重度抑郁症发作和复发/重现的基础。在这里,我们研究是否有来自主要理论的生物标志物的前瞻性证据。我们专注于神经影像学、胃肠道因素、免疫学、神经营养因子、神经递质、激素和氧化应激。在 Pubmed、Embase 和 PsychInfo 中搜索截至 2019 年 06 月发表的文章。还筛选了纳入文章的参考文献和引文,以确定其他文章。纳入标准为:以 MDD 诊断为结果,以生物标志物为预测因子,以及前瞻性设计。相应地制定了搜索词。应用 PRISMA 指南。如果确定了三个或更多可比的研究,则使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们的搜索产生了 67464 篇文章,其中有 75 篇前瞻性文章涉及:神经影像学(N=24)、胃肠道因素(N=1)、免疫学(N=8)、神经营养因子(N=2)、神经递质(N=1)、激素(N=39)、氧化应激(N=1)。对脑容量和免疫学标志物的荟萃分析没有意义。只有皮质醇(N=19,OR=1.294,p=0.024)对 MDD 的发作/复发/重现具有预测作用,但对 MDD 的发作/复发/重现时间没有预测作用。然而,当从分析中删除包括基线临床诊断的参与者的研究时,这种效果消失了。其他研究差异太大,无法比较。因此,缺乏主要生物学理论来解释抑郁症的发作和维持。只有皮质醇被确定为 MDD 的潜在预测因子,但结果受到疾病状态的影响。需要高质量(前瞻性)的 MDD 研究来阐明 MDD 的病因和维持。