• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国法定医疗保险关于晚期前列腺癌初始促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂和激动剂治疗的回顾性真实世界研究:处方模式与医院费用]

[Retrospective SHI (Statutory Health Insurances) real-world study on initial GnRH antagonist and agonist therapy for advanced prostate cancer: prescription patterns and hospital costs in Germany].

作者信息

Hupe Marie Christine, Hammerer Peter, Ketz Miriam, Kossack Nils, Colling Christiane, Merseburger Axel S

机构信息

Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.

Klinik für Urologie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland.

出版信息

Aktuelle Urol. 2020 Jun;51(3):275-284. doi: 10.1055/a-1018-1651. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1055/a-1018-1651
PMID:31745962
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a pivotal role in the treatment of advanced or metastasised prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this health services research was to compare real-world data on the initial use of different GnRH agonists and antagonists (GnRHa) with regard to prescription patterns, hospitalisation rates and costs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Anonymised claims data from > 70 German health insurance funds between 2010 and 2015 (n = 4 205 227) were analysed (1 year pre-observation period, 1 index quarter with initial GnRHa prescription, ≥ 2 years of follow-up (FU)).

RESULTS

The study population included 2382 PCa patients (mean age 75 years). Leuprolide (Leu) was prescribed most frequently (56.6 %). At initial GnRHa administration, 70 % of patients neither had lymph node nor distant metastases. Around 11.2 % of all patients stopped GnRHa treatment after the first prescription, 17.6 % switched their initial therapy to another substance after a mean of 457 days (median: 399 days); in the hybrid (hyb) group 100 days earlier on average than in the agonist group (p = 0.016). The prevalence ranking of the most common comorbidities was consistent over time: hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. The prevalence of hypertension increased significantly in the agonist group (16.4 %) compared with the antagonist (6.9 %, p = 0.022) and hyb group (11.6 %, p = 0.006). With regard to CVD, there were no significant differences in the relative growth rate between the 3 combined therapy classes. In total, 23.9 % of all patients died within the 3-year FU. The mortality rate was lowest for triptorelin (Trp, 22.1 %) and highest for goserelin (Gos, 29.4 %, n.s.). In the index quarter, 26.4 % of patients had at least one inpatient hospitalisation [min-max: Trp 22.4 %; Gos 30.3 %], with an average length of hospital stay/patient of 3 days [Trp 2.4; Gos 4.5]. The annual hospitalisation rate was between 36.2 and 40.7 %, the average length of hospital stay in the entire FU was between 17.6 (Trp) and 20.8 days (hyb). The average hospital costs in the index quarter were approx. EUR 1200 [Trp 988; Gos 1803] and per FU year approx. EUR 3000. In the Trp cohort, total costs (index quarter + 3 years) were more than EUR 1000 below the average costs of EUR 9476 [Trp 8116; Leu 9779; n.s.].

CONCLUSION

This comparative retrospective analysis provides real-world information on initial GnRHa treatment for advanced prostate cancer, revealing differences in treatment patterns, hospitalisation rates and hospital costs in Germany.

摘要

引言

雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)在晚期或转移性前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗中起着关键作用。这项卫生服务研究的目的是比较不同促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和拮抗剂(GnRHa)初始使用的真实世界数据,包括处方模式、住院率和成本。

材料与方法

分析了2010年至2015年间来自70多家德国健康保险基金的匿名理赔数据(n = 4205227)(1年观察前期、1个初始GnRHa处方索引季度、≥2年随访(FU))。

结果

研究人群包括2382例PCa患者(平均年龄75岁)。亮丙瑞林(Leu)的处方最为频繁(56.6%)。在初始GnRHa给药时,70%的患者既无淋巴结转移也无远处转移。在所有患者中,约11.2%在首次处方后停止GnRHa治疗,17.6%在平均457天(中位数:399天)后将初始治疗换为另一种药物;在混合(hyb)组中平均比激动剂组早100天(p = 0.016)。最常见合并症的患病率排名随时间保持一致:高血压、高脂血症、心血管疾病(CVD)和糖尿病。与拮抗剂组(6.9%,p = 0.022)和hyb组(11.6%,p = 0.006)相比,激动剂组高血压患病率显著增加(16.4%)。关于CVD,3种联合治疗类别之间的相对增长率无显著差异。在3年随访期内,所有患者中有23.9%死亡。曲普瑞林(Trp)的死亡率最低(22.1%),戈舍瑞林(Gos)的死亡率最高(29.4%,无统计学意义)。在索引季度,26.4%的患者至少有1次住院治疗[最小值 - 最大值:Trp 22.4%;Gos 30.3%],每位患者的平均住院天数为3天[Trp 2.4;Gos 4.5]。年度住院率在36.2%至40.7%之间,整个随访期内的平均住院天数在17.6天(Trp)至20.8天(hyb)之间。索引季度的平均住院费用约为1200欧元[Trp 988;Gos 1803],每年随访期的费用约为3000欧元。在Trp队列中,总费用(索引季度 + 3年)比平均费用9476欧元低1000多欧元[Trp 8116;Leu 9779;无统计学意义]。

结论

这项比较性回顾分析提供了晚期前列腺癌初始GnRHa治疗的真实世界信息,揭示了德国在治疗模式、住院率和住院费用方面的差异。

相似文献

1
[Retrospective SHI (Statutory Health Insurances) real-world study on initial GnRH antagonist and agonist therapy for advanced prostate cancer: prescription patterns and hospital costs in Germany].[德国法定医疗保险关于晚期前列腺癌初始促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂和激动剂治疗的回顾性真实世界研究:处方模式与医院费用]
Aktuelle Urol. 2020 Jun;51(3):275-284. doi: 10.1055/a-1018-1651. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
2
Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Prostate Cancer Initiating GnRH Agonists/Antagonists Therapy Using a German Claims Database: Epidemiological and Patient Outcomes.使用德国医保索赔数据库对开始GnRH激动剂/拮抗剂治疗的前列腺癌患者进行回顾性分析:流行病学和患者结局
Front Oncol. 2018 Nov 27;8:543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00543. eCollection 2018.
3
Cardiovascular risk of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus agonist in men with prostate cancer: an observational study in Taiwan.男性前列腺癌患者促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂与激动剂的心血管风险:来自台湾的一项观察性研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):722-729. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00555-0. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
[Cost effectiveness of GnRH antagonists in patients with prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk : Comparative analysis against Leuprorelin by the Number Needed to Treat].[促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂在前列腺癌合并心血管疾病风险患者中的成本效益:与亮丙瑞林的治疗所需人数对比分析]
Urologe A. 2017 Jul;56(7):917-924. doi: 10.1007/s00120-017-0382-8.
5
A comparative study on the efficacies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist in neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy combined with transperineal prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂与GnRH拮抗剂在新辅助雄激素剥夺疗法联合经会阴前列腺近距离放疗治疗局限性前列腺癌中的疗效比较研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2737-8.
6
Prescription practice for LH-RH analogs and androgen receptor antagonists in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer in Germany (1993-2003).
Urol Int. 2006;77(4):311-6. doi: 10.1159/000096334.
7
Prostate cancer follow-up costs in Germany from 2000 to 2015.2000 年至 2015 年德国前列腺癌随访成本。
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Feb;16(1):86-94. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01006-w. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
8
Sex differences in treatment patterns of six chronic diseases: an analysis from the German statutory health insurance.六种慢性病治疗模式中的性别差异:来自德国法定医疗保险的分析
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;17(3):343-54. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0422.
9
Cardiovascular Mortality Following Short-term Androgen Deprivation in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of RTOG 94-08.临床局限性前列腺癌短期雄激素剥夺治疗后的心血管死亡率:RTOG 94-08分析
Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular risk: No meaningful difference between GnRH antagonist and agonists-a nationwide population-based cohort study based on 2010-2013 French Health Insurance data.雄激素剥夺疗法与心血管风险:促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂与激动剂之间无显著差异——一项基于2010 - 2013年法国医疗保险数据的全国性人群队列研究
Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;77:99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Factors influencing the choice of androgen deprivation therapy for patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer : Results of the ProComD study].[影响激素敏感性前列腺癌患者雄激素剥夺治疗选择的因素:ProComD研究结果]
Urologe A. 2022 Feb;61(2):173-182. doi: 10.1007/s00120-021-01620-7. Epub 2021 Aug 17.