• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

火器伤幸存者的长期功能、心理、情感及社会结局

Long-term Functional, Psychological, Emotional, and Social Outcomes in Survivors of Firearm Injuries.

作者信息

Vella Michael A, Warshauer Alexander, Tortorello Gabriella, Fernandez-Moure Joseph, Giacolone Joseph, Chen Bofeng, Cabulong Alexander, Chreiman Kristen, Sims Carrie, Schwab C William, Reilly Patrick M, Lane-Fall Meghan, Seamon Mark J

机构信息

Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

currently affiliated with Division of Acute Care Surgery and Trauma, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):51-59. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4533.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4533
PMID:31746949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6902182/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The outcomes of firearm injuries in the United States are devastating. Although firearm mortality and costs have been investigated, the long-term outcomes after surviving a gunshot wound (GSW) remain unstudied.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term functional, psychological, emotional, and social outcomes among survivors of firearm injuries.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study assessed patient-reported outcomes among GSW survivors from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2017, at a single urban level I trauma center. Attempts were made to contact all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) discharged alive during the study period. A total of 3088 patients were identified; 516 (16.7%) who died during hospitalization and 45 (1.5%) who died after discharge were excluded. Telephone contact was made with 263 (10.4%) of the remaining patients, and 80 (30.4%) declined study participation. The final study sample consisted of 183 participants. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2018, through June 20, 2019.

EXPOSURES

A GSW sustained from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2017.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Scores on 8 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (Global Physical Health, Global Mental Health, Physical Function, Emotional Support, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, Pain Intensity, Alcohol Use, and Severity of Substance Use) and the Primary Care PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder) Screen for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.

RESULTS

Of the 263 patients who survived a GSW and were contacted, 183 (69.6%) participated. Participants were more likely to be admitted to the hospital compared with those who declined (150 [82.0%] vs 54 [67.5%]; P = .01). Participants had a median time from GSW of 5.9 years (range, 4.7-8.1 years) and were primarily young (median age, 27 years [range, 21-36 years]), black (168 [91.8%]), male (169 [92.3%]), and employed before GSW (pre-GSW, 139 [76.0%]; post-GSW, 113 [62.1%]; decrease, 14.3%; P = .004). Combined alcohol and substance use increased by 13.2% (pre-GSW use, 56 [30.8%]; post-GSW use, 80 [44.0%]). Participants had mean (SD) scores below population norms (50 [10]) for Global Physical Health (45 [11]; P < .001), Global Mental Health (48 [11]; P = .03), and Physical Function (45 [12]; P < .001) PROMIS metrics. Eighty-nine participants (48.6%) had a positive screen for probable PTSD. Patients who required intensive care unit admission (n = 64) had worse mean (SD) Physical Function scores (42 [13] vs 46 [11]; P = .045) than those not requiring the intensive care unit. Survivors no more than 5 years after injury had greater PTSD risk (38 of 63 [60.3%] vs 51 of 119 [42.9%]; P = .03) but better mean (SD) Global Physical Health scores (47 [11] vs 43 [11]; P = .04) than those more than 5 years after injury.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study's results suggest that the lasting effects of firearm injury reach far beyond mortality and economic burden. Survivors of GSWs may have negative outcomes for years after injury. These findings suggest that early identification and initiation of long-term longitudinal care is paramount.

摘要

重要性

在美国,枪支伤害的后果是毁灭性的。尽管已经对枪支死亡率和成本进行了调查,但枪伤(GSW)幸存者的长期后果仍未得到研究。

目的

确定枪支伤害幸存者的长期功能、心理、情感和社会后果。

设计、地点和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究评估了2008年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间,在一家城市一级创伤中心的枪伤幸存者中患者报告的结果。研究人员试图联系在研究期间存活出院的所有成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。共识别出3088名患者;排除了516名(16.7%)在住院期间死亡的患者和45名(1.5%)出院后死亡的患者。对其余患者中的263名(10.4%)进行了电话联系,其中80名(30.4%)拒绝参与研究。最终的研究样本包括183名参与者。数据分析时间为2018年6月1日至2019年6月20日。

暴露因素

2008年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间遭受的枪伤。

主要结局和测量指标

8项患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)工具的得分(全球身体健康、全球心理健康、身体功能、情感支持、参与社会角色和活动的能力、疼痛强度、酒精使用和物质使用严重程度)以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的初级保健创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)筛查。

结果

在263名枪伤幸存者中,183名(69.6%)参与了研究。与拒绝参与的患者相比,参与研究的患者更有可能入院(150名[82.0%]对54名[67.5%];P = 0.01)。参与者从枪伤到研究时的中位时间为5.9年(范围4.7 -

相似文献

1
Long-term Functional, Psychological, Emotional, and Social Outcomes in Survivors of Firearm Injuries.火器伤幸存者的长期功能、心理、情感及社会结局
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jan 1;155(1):51-59. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4533.
2
Firearm Injury, It's Not Just Physical: The Adverse Impact on Patient-Reported Socioeconomic, Mental Health, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.枪支伤害,不仅是身体上的伤害:对患者报告的社会经济、心理健康和生活质量结果的不利影响。
Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):3038-3045. doi: 10.1177/00031348241262434. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Lasting impression of violence: Retained bullets and depressive symptoms.暴力的持久影响:留存子弹与抑郁症状
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.057. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
4
Long-term Outcomes of Firearm Injury Survivors in the United States: The National Trauma Research Action Plan Scoping Review.美国枪支伤害幸存者的长期结局:国家创伤研究行动计划范围审查。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):962-970. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005204.
5
Patient-reported Outcomes at 6 to 12 Months Among Survivors of Firearm Injury in the United States.美国枪支伤害幸存者 6 至 12 个月的患者报告结局。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1247-e1251. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003797.
6
Long-term mortality of patients surviving firearm violence.遭受枪支暴力后存活患者的长期死亡率。
Inj Prev. 2016 Apr;22(2):129-34. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041710. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Contributors to Postinjury Mental Health in Urban Black Men With Serious Injuries.城市中黑人男性重伤后心理健康的影响因素。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):836-843. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1622.
8
A Prospective US National Trauma Center Study of Firearm Injury Survivors Weapon Carriage and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms.一项针对美国国家创伤中心枪击伤幸存者携枪行为与创伤后应激障碍症状的前瞻性研究。
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e364-e369. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005043.
9
Epidemiology of Gunshot-Related Spinal Injuries and Related Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality in the United States from 2015-2019: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis.2015 - 2019年美国枪伤相关脊柱损伤的流行病学及院内死亡相关风险因素:一项国家创伤数据库分析
J Neurotrauma. 2024 May;41(9-10):1112-1121. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0081. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
10
Gunshot and explosion injuries: characteristics, outcomes, and implications for care of terror-related injuries in Israel.枪伤和爆炸伤:以色列与恐怖主义相关损伤的特征、结局及护理意义
Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):311-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114012.84732.be.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for the Houston Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program.休斯顿医院暴力干预项目方案
medRxiv. 2025 May 19:2025.05.18.25327870. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.18.25327870.
2
Evaluation of a Region-Wide Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program : A Pilot Cohort Study.一项基于医院的区域暴力干预项目评估:一项试点队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2025 Aug;178(8):1116-1126. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-01576. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
3
Protocol for the Houston Hospital-based violence intervention program.休斯顿医院暴力干预项目方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0325569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325569. eCollection 2025.
4
Violent Firearm Injury and Homelessness: Examining the Experiences of Black Men Participating in Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs.暴力枪支伤害与无家可归:审视参与医院暴力干预项目的黑人男性的经历。
Am J Mens Health. 2025 May-Jun;19(3):15579883251343966. doi: 10.1177/15579883251343966. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
5
Psychosocial Impacts of Non-Fatal Firearm Injuries on Youth: Findings from a Qualitative Study.非致命性枪支伤害对青少年的社会心理影响:一项定性研究的结果
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251339075. doi: 10.1177/00469580251339075. Epub 2025 May 31.
6
Best Practices for Orthopaedic Treatment of Pediatric Gunshot Injuries.小儿枪伤的骨科治疗最佳实践
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Feb 12;5(3):683. doi: 10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-683. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Trends and Disparities in Firearm Injuries Among Emerging Adults: A 15-Year Analysis of Emergency Department Admissions in the U.S.新兴成年人枪支伤害的趋势与差异:对美国急诊科入院情况的15年分析
AJPM Focus. 2025 Mar 20;4(3):100332. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100332. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Understanding the broader impacts of non-fatal firearm violence trauma in the United States: a scoping review.了解美国非致命性枪支暴力创伤的更广泛影响:一项范围综述。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Apr 19;46:101091. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101091. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Total Hip Arthroplasty After Gunshot-Related Hip Injuries: Case Series and Review of Literature.枪伤相关髋关节损伤后的全髋关节置换术:病例系列及文献综述
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Mar 26;33:101671. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101671. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Crossing the chasm: engaging Black men survivors of gun violence in mental health services.跨越鸿沟:让遭受枪支暴力的黑人男性幸存者参与心理健康服务。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Mar 19;10(1):e001560. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001560. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Proceedings from the Medical Summit on Firearm Injury Prevention: A Public Health Approach to Reduce Death and Disability in the US.《枪支伤害预防医学峰会会议记录:美国减少死亡和残疾的公共卫生方法》
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Oct;229(4):415-430.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Interviewer- versus self-administration of PROMIS® measures for adults with traumatic injury.访谈者与自我管理 PROMIS® 成人创伤性损伤措施。
Health Psychol. 2019 May;38(5):435-444. doi: 10.1037/hea0000685.
3
Factors Associated With Long-term Outcomes After Injury: Results of the Functional Outcomes and Recovery After Trauma Emergencies (FORTE) Multicenter Cohort Study.创伤后长期结局的相关因素:创伤急救后功能结局和恢复(FORTE)多中心队列研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1165-1173. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003101.
4
Firearm Injuries and Violence Prevention - The Potential Power of a Surgeon General's Report.枪支伤害与暴力预防——一份卫生局局长报告的潜在影响力
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 2;379(5):408-410. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1803295. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
The role of epidemiology in firearm violence prevention: a Policy Brief.流行病学在预防枪支暴力中的作用:政策简报。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1015-1019. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy059.
6
Shift in U.S. payer responsibility for the acute care of violent injuries after the Affordable Care Act: Implications for prevention.平价医疗法案实施后美国暴力伤害急性护理支付方责任转变:对预防工作的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2192-2196. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.070. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Lasting impression of violence: Retained bullets and depressive symptoms.暴力的持久影响:留存子弹与抑郁症状
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.057. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: A population-based longitudinal study.重伤患者的长期健康状况及发展轨迹:一项基于人群的纵向研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 5;14(7):e1002322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002322. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
Firearm Deaths in America: Can We Learn From 462,000 Lives Lost?美国的枪支死亡事件:我们能从46.2万人丧生中吸取教训吗?
Ann Surg. 2017 Sep;266(3):432-440. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002376.
10
Costs and Financial Burden of Initial Hospitalizations for Firearm Injuries in the United States, 2006-2014.2006 - 2014年美国枪支伤害首次住院治疗的费用及经济负担
Am J Public Health. 2017 May;107(5):770-774. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303684. Epub 2017 Mar 21.