Couturier Jennifer, Kimber Melissa, Barwick Melanie, Woodford Tracy, Mcvey Gail, Findlay Sheri, Webb Cheryl, Niccols Alison, Lock James
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):64-73. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz160.
In this study, we evaluated a blended implementation approach with teams learning to provide family-based treatment (FBT) to adolescents with eating disorders. Four sites participated in a sequential mixed method pre-post study to evaluate the implementation of FBT in their clinical settings. The implementation approach included: (a) preparatory site visits; (b) the establishment of implementation teams; (c) a training workshop; (d) monthly clinical consultation; (e) monthly implementation consultation; and (f) fidelity assessment. Quantitative measures examining attitudes toward evidence-based practice, organizational learning environment and organizational readiness for change, as well as, individual readiness for change were delivered pre- and postimplementation. Correlational analyses were used to examine associations between baseline variables and therapist fidelity to FBT. Fundamental qualitative description guided the sampling and data collection for the qualitative interviews performed at the conclusion of the study. Seventeen individuals participated in this study (nine therapists, four medical practitioners, and four administrators). The predetermined threshold of implementation success of 80% fidelity in every FBT session was achieved by only one therapist. However, mean fidelity scores were similar to those reported in other studies. Participant attitudes, readiness, and self-efficacy were not associated with fidelity and did not change significantly from pre- to postimplementation. In qualitative interviews, all participants reported that the implementation intervention was helpful in adopting FBT. Our blended implementation approach was well received by participants. A larger trial is needed to determine which implementation factors predict FBT fidelity and impact patient outcomes.
在本研究中,我们评估了一种混合实施方法,即让团队学习为患有饮食失调症的青少年提供基于家庭的治疗(FBT)。四个地点参与了一项前后相继的混合方法研究,以评估FBT在其临床环境中的实施情况。实施方法包括:(a)筹备性实地考察;(b)组建实施团队;(c)举办培训工作坊;(d)每月进行临床咨询;(e)每月进行实施咨询;以及(f)保真度评估。在实施前后分别进行了定量测量,以考察对循证实践的态度、组织学习环境和组织变革准备情况,以及个人变革准备情况。采用相关分析来检验基线变量与治疗师对FBT的保真度之间的关联。基本定性描述指导了在研究结束时进行的定性访谈的抽样和数据收集。17人参与了本研究(9名治疗师、4名医生和4名管理人员)。只有一名治疗师达到了每个FBT疗程80%保真度的预定实施成功阈值。然而,平均保真度得分与其他研究报告的得分相似。参与者的态度、准备情况和自我效能感与保真度无关,并且从实施前到实施后没有显著变化。在定性访谈中,所有参与者都报告说实施干预有助于采用FBT。我们的混合实施方法受到了参与者的好评。需要进行更大规模的试验来确定哪些实施因素能够预测FBT保真度并影响患者的治疗效果。