Herschell Amy D, Kolko David J, Scudder Ashley T, Taber-Thomas Sarah, Schaffner Kristen F, Hiegel Shelley A, Iyengar Satish, Chaffin Mark, Mrozowski Stanley
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Implement Sci. 2015 Sep 28;10:133. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0324-z.
Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are available for treating childhood behavioral health challenges. Despite EBTs' potential to help children and families, they have primarily remained in university settings. Little empirical evidence exists regarding how specific, commonly used training and quality control models are effective in changing practice, achieving full implementation, and supporting positive client outcomes.
METHODS/DESIGN: This study (NIMH RO1 MH095750; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02543359), which is currently in progress, will evaluate the effectiveness of three training models (Learning Collaborative (LC), Cascading Model (CM), and Distance Education (DE)) to implement a well-established EBT , Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, in real-world, community settings. The three models differ in their costs, skill training, quality control methods, and capacity to address broader implementation challenges. The project is guided by three specific aims: (1) to build knowledge about training outcomes, (2) to build knowledge about implementation outcomes, and (3) to test the differential impact of training clinicians using LC, CM, and DE models on key client outcomes. Fifty (50) licensed psychiatric clinics across Pennsylvania were randomized to one of the three training conditions: (1) LC, (2) CM, or (3) DE. The impact of training on practice skills (clinician level) and implementation/sustainment outcomes (clinic level) are being evaluated at four timepoints coinciding with the training schedule: baseline, 6 (mid), 12 (post), and 24 months (1 year follow-up). Immediately after training begins, parent-child dyads (client level) are recruited from the caseloads of participating clinicians. Client outcomes are being assessed at four timepoints (pre-treatment, 1, 6, and 12 months after the pre-treatment).
This proposal builds on an ongoing initiative to implement an EBT statewide. A team of diverse stakeholders including state policy makers, payers, consumers, service providers, and academics from different, but complementary areas (e.g., public health, social work, psychiatry), has been assembled to guide the research plan by incorporating input from multidimensional perspective.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02543359.
循证治疗(EBTs)可用于应对儿童行为健康挑战。尽管循证治疗有帮助儿童及其家庭的潜力,但它们主要仍局限于大学环境。关于特定的、常用的培训和质量控制模式在改变实践、实现全面实施以及支持积极的客户结果方面如何有效,几乎没有实证证据。
方法/设计:本研究(美国国立精神卫生研究所RO1 MH095750;ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02543359)目前正在进行中,将评估三种培训模式(学习协作模式(LC)、级联模式(CM)和远程教育模式(DE))在现实世界的社区环境中实施一种成熟的循证治疗方法——亲子互动疗法的有效性。这三种模式在成本、技能培训、质量控制方法以及应对更广泛实施挑战的能力方面存在差异。该项目由三个具体目标指导:(1)积累关于培训结果的知识,(2)积累关于实施结果的知识,(3)测试使用LC、CM和DE模式培训临床医生对关键客户结果的不同影响。宾夕法尼亚州的50家持牌精神科诊所被随机分配到三种培训条件之一:(1)LC,(2)CM,或(3)DE。在与培训时间表一致的四个时间点评估培训对实践技能(临床医生层面)和实施/维持结果(诊所层面)的影响:基线、6个月(中期)、12个月(后期)和24个月(1年随访)。培训开始后立即从参与临床医生的病例中招募亲子二元组(客户层面)。在四个时间点(治疗前、治疗前1个月、6个月和12个月)评估客户结果。
本提案基于一项正在进行的在全州范围内实施循证治疗的倡议。一个由不同利益相关者组成的团队,包括州政策制定者、支付方、消费者、服务提供者以及来自不同但互补领域(如公共卫生、社会工作、精神病学)的学者,已聚集在一起,通过纳入多维度视角的意见来指导研究计划。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02543359。