Saito Yasumasa, Kitagawa Kazuo, Sato Junya, Yamamoto Hidemi, Watanabe Michiaki, Masubuchi Masataka
Dept. of Pharmacy, Atsugi City Hospital.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2019 Nov;46(11):1741-1745.
Aside effect of anti-angiogenic agent treatment is proteinuria. Evaluation of the severity of adverse effects and the decision to discontinue treatment is based on the qualitative analysis of urinary proteins. However, a qualitative analysis result may not be indicative of the actual amounts of protein excreted. In this study, we evaluated the possibility of using the urine protein/creatinine ratio(UPCR), instead of a qualitative urine analysis, to monitor patients treated with antiangiogenic agents.
Urinalysis data of patients receiving anti-angiogenic agents-bevacizumab, ramucirumab, or aflibercept-were retrospectively analyzed from clinical records. Acorrelation between the urine protein content(qualitative and quantitative analyses)and continuity of anti-angiogenic agent treatment was evaluated.
Atotal of 24 patients (age, 70.83±7.45 years)who received treatment for colorectal cancer(n=17), lung cancer(n=4), gastric cancer(n=2), and breast cancer(n=1)were included. One hundred and sixty-five urinalysis results were collected. Alinear correlation between the qualitative urinalysis results(1+to 3+)and UPCR(r=0.746, p<0.01)was obtained. In patients with a urine protein content of 2+(qualitative analysis), the UPCR was <2.0 for 25 patients and ≥2.0 but <3.5 for 4 patients. Similarly, in patients with a urine protein content of 3+, the UPCR was <2.0 for 3 patients and ≥2.0 but <3.5 for 1 patient. Seventeen patients with a urine protein content of 2+ and 3 patients with a urine protein content of 3+ discontinued treatment with anti-angiogenic agents before estimation of the UPCR could be performed. These figures were reduced to 4 patients and 2 patients, respectively, following UPCR assessment.
Switching the estimation of proteinuria from a qualitative analysis to UPCR might lead to better safety monitoring and prevent unnecessary discontinuation of anti-angio- genic agent treatment.
抗血管生成药物治疗的副作用是蛋白尿。不良反应严重程度的评估以及停药决定是基于尿蛋白的定性分析。然而,定性分析结果可能无法指示实际排出的蛋白量。在本研究中,我们评估了使用尿蛋白/肌酐比值(UPCR)而非定性尿分析来监测接受抗血管生成药物治疗患者的可能性。
从临床记录中回顾性分析接受抗血管生成药物(贝伐单抗、雷莫西尤单抗或阿柏西普)治疗患者的尿液分析数据。评估尿蛋白含量(定性和定量分析)与抗血管生成药物治疗连续性之间的相关性。
共纳入24例患者(年龄,70.83±7.45岁),其中结直肠癌患者17例、肺癌患者4例、胃癌患者2例、乳腺癌患者1例。收集到165份尿液分析结果。定性尿分析结果(1+至3+)与UPCR之间呈线性相关(r = 0.746,p<0.01)。尿蛋白含量为2+(定性分析)的患者中,25例患者的UPCR<2.0,4例患者的UPCR≥2.0但<3.5。同样,尿蛋白含量为3+的患者中,3例患者的UPCR<2.0,1例患者的UPCR≥2.0但<3.5。17例尿蛋白含量为2+的患者和3例尿蛋白含量为3+的患者在进行UPCR评估之前停用了抗血管生成药物。在进行UPCR评估后,这些数字分别降至4例患者和2例患者。
将蛋白尿评估从定性分析转换为UPCR可能会带来更好的安全性监测,并防止不必要地停用抗血管生成药物治疗。