Miyachi Yohei, Kuzuya Teiji, Kawabe Naoto, Hirooka Yoshiki
Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2024 Jun;51(6):627-630.
When we administer atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, we often encounter inconsistent results between the qualitative dipstick urinalysis and the urine protein/creatinine ratio(UPCR)measurements. In this study, we investigated the relationship between qualitative dipstick urinalysis and UPCR in these patients, and assessed whether incorporating UPCR into the testing protocol could prevent unnecessary interruptions during bevacizumab treatment.
This study analyzed 298 urine samples collected from 61 patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, who were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our institution between October 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. We used UPCR as an alternative test to the 24-hour urine protein and set the discontinuation criteria for bevacizumab at a UPCR of 2.0 or higher.
Among the 41 samples that tested positive for 2+ on the dipstick test, only one(2.4%)had a UPCR exceeding 2.0. Additionally, among the 44 samples that showed a 3+ result, 24 samples(54.5%)had a UPCR higher than 2.0. If our decision to discontinue bevacizumab had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 2+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in 97.6%(40/41)of the cases. Even if the decision had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 3+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in almost half of the cases(45.5%, 20/44).
Our findings suggest that the addition of UPCR to the qualitative dipstick urinalysis during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma could help prevent unnecessary interruptions of bevacizumab and offer more clinical benefits in real-world practice, compared to using qualitative dipstick urinalysis alone.
当我们对晚期肝细胞癌患者使用阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗进行治疗时,我们经常会遇到尿试纸定性分析与尿蛋白/肌酐比值(UPCR)测量结果不一致的情况。在本研究中,我们调查了这些患者尿试纸定性分析与UPCR之间的关系,并评估了将UPCR纳入检测方案是否可以防止贝伐单抗治疗期间的不必要中断。
本研究分析了2020年10月1日至2021年8月31日期间在我们机构接受阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗的61例晚期肝细胞癌患者收集的298份尿液样本。我们使用UPCR作为24小时尿蛋白的替代检测方法,并将贝伐单抗的停药标准设定为UPCR为2.0或更高。
在尿试纸检测呈2+阳性的41份样本中,只有1份(2.4%)的UPCR超过2.0。此外,在显示3+结果的44份样本中,24份样本(54.5%)的UPCR高于2.0。如果我们基于尿试纸分析结果为2+而决定停用贝伐单抗,那么在97.6%(40/41)的病例中我们可以继续使用贝伐单抗。即使基于尿试纸分析结果为3+做出决定,在几乎一半的病例中(45.5%,20/44)我们也可以继续使用贝伐单抗。
我们的研究结果表明,在晚期肝细胞癌患者接受阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗期间,在尿试纸定性分析中加入UPCR有助于防止贝伐单抗的不必要中断,并且与单独使用尿试纸定性分析相比,在实际临床实践中能带来更多临床益处。