Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
JiVitA Program, Johns Hopkins University, Gaibandha, Rangpur, Bangladesh.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):861. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4696-7.
Measurement of antenatal care (ANC) service coverage is often limited to the number of contacts or type of providers, reflecting a gap in the assessment of quality as well as cost estimations and health impact. The study aims to determine service subcomponents and provider and patient costs of ANC services and compares them between community (i.e. satellite clinics) and facility care (i.e. primary and secondary health centers) settings in rural Bangladesh.
Service contents and cost data were collected by one researcher and four interviewers in various community and facility health care settings in Gaibandha district between September and December 2016. We conducted structured interviews with organization managers, observational studies of ANC service provision (n = 70) for service contents and provider costs (service and drug costs) and exit interviews with pregnant women (n = 70) for patient costs (direct and indirect costs) in health clinics at community and facility levels. Fisher's exact tests were used to determine any different patient characteristics between community and facility settings. ANC service contents were assessed by 63 subitems categorized into 11 groups and compared within and across community and facility settings. Provider and patient costs were collected in Bangladesh taka and analyzed as 2016 US Dollars (0.013 exchange rate).
We found generally similar provider and patient characteristics between the community and facility settings except in clients' gestational age. High compliance (> 50%) of service subcomponents were observed in blood pressure monitoring, weight measurement, iron and folate supplementation given, and tetanus vaccine, while lower compliance of service subcomponents (< 50%) were observed in some physical examinations such as edema and ultrasonogram and routine tests such as blood test and urine test. Average unit costs of ANC service provision were about double at the facility level ($2.75) compared with community-based care ($1.62). ANC patient costs at facilities ($2.66) were about three times higher than in the community ($0.78).
The study reveals a delay in pregnant women's initial ANC care seeking, gaps in compliance of ANC subcomponents and difference of provider and patient costs between facility and community settings.
产前护理(ANC)服务覆盖范围的测量通常仅限于接触次数或提供服务的提供者类型,这反映了在评估质量以及成本估算和健康影响方面存在差距。本研究旨在确定 ANC 服务的服务子部分和提供者及患者成本,并比较孟加拉国农村地区社区(即卫星诊所)和医疗机构(即初级和二级保健中心)之间的差异。
2016 年 9 月至 12 月,研究人员和 4 名访谈员在盖班达区的各个社区和医疗机构中收集服务内容和成本数据。我们对组织管理者进行了结构化访谈,对 ANC 服务提供情况进行了观察性研究(n=70),以了解服务内容和提供者成本(服务和药物成本),并对社区和医疗机构级别的孕妇进行了离职访谈(n=70),以了解患者成本(直接和间接成本)。我们使用 Fisher 确切检验来确定社区和医疗机构环境中患者特征的任何差异。ANC 服务内容通过 63 个子项进行评估,分为 11 组,并在社区和医疗机构内部以及跨社区和医疗机构进行比较。提供者和患者成本以孟加拉塔卡收集,并以 2016 年美元(0.013 汇率)进行分析。
我们发现社区和医疗机构环境中的提供者和患者特征通常相似,除了客户的妊娠年龄外。血压监测、体重测量、铁和叶酸补充剂以及破伤风疫苗的服务子部分的遵守率较高(>50%),而一些体格检查(如水肿和超声检查)和常规检查(如血液检查和尿液检查)的服务子部分的遵守率较低(<50%)。医疗机构 ANC 服务提供的平均单位成本约为社区为基础护理的两倍(2.75 美元)(1.62 美元)。设施中的 ANC 患者成本(2.66 美元)是社区的三倍多(0.78 美元)。
本研究揭示了孕妇最初寻求 ANC 护理的延迟、ANC 子部分遵守率的差距以及设施和社区环境之间提供者和患者成本的差异。