Hasan Md Zahid, Mehdi Gazi Golam, Tisha Khadija Islam, Rabbani Md Golam, Ahmed Mohammad Wahid, Paul Subrata, Islam Ziaul, Mahmood Shehrin Shaila
Health Economics and Financing, Health Systems and Population Studies Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 14;20(1):e0317317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317317. eCollection 2025.
Upazila Health Complexes (UzHC) serve as the backbone of primary healthcare (PHC) at the sub-district level in Bangladesh, delivering comprehensive healthcare services including both inpatient and outpatient services to the grassroots levels. However, not all the prescribed medicines and diagnostics services are always available at these facilities for outpatient care. This results in out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) to the patients for getting prescribed medicines and diagnostics services which has not been properly explored. Thus, we aimed to estimate the overall provider and user costs for outpatient care services at selected UzHCs in Bangladesh.
An ingredient-based costing approach was applied to estimate the costs for the most commonly reported illnesses at outpatient of UzHCs from a societal perspective. We conducted a health facility survey at four purposively selected UzHCs to estimate provider costs and a patient exit survey among 452 patients of selected illnesses to estimate the user costs. Commonly reported illnesses were identified in consultation with healthcare providers of these facilities. The difference between costs of prescribed and provided medicines at UzHCs was estimated using the market prices. Data was collected between February to March 2021.
The societal costs of the common outpatient illness or symptoms varied significantly, ranging from BDT 642 to BDT 1,384 per episode. Antenatal care had the highest cost burden at BDT 1,384, followed by respiratory illness at BDT 783 and urinary tract infection at BDT 670. On average, the provider spent BDT 289 for treating an outpatient, while a patient incurred BDT 446 as OOPE. Further, a patient was expected to spend an average of BDT 341 for purchasing medicines not provided from UzHCs.
Our study found significant gaps between prescribed and provided medicines at UzHCs, leading to higher OOPE for patients. The current healthcare resource allocation strategy does not consider the outpatient load and healthcare demand at PHC facilities, which further exacerbates this gap. Addressing this gap requires a fundamental shift towards a demand-driven resource allocation model within the healthcare financing strategy to improve healthcare access and achieve health for all.
在孟加拉国,乡级卫生综合机构(UzHC)是基层医疗保健(PHC)的支柱,为基层民众提供包括住院和门诊服务在内的全面医疗保健服务。然而,这些机构并非总能提供所有规定的药品和诊断服务用于门诊治疗。这导致患者为获取规定的药品和诊断服务而产生自付费用(OOPE),而这一点尚未得到充分探究。因此,我们旨在估算孟加拉国选定的UzHC机构门诊护理服务的总体提供者成本和使用者成本。
采用基于成分的成本核算方法,从社会角度估算UzHC机构门诊最常见疾病的成本。我们在四个经过有目的选择的UzHC机构进行了卫生设施调查,以估算提供者成本,并对452名患有选定疾病的患者进行了患者出院调查,以估算使用者成本。通过与这些机构的医疗服务提供者协商,确定了常见疾病。利用市场价格估算UzHC机构规定药品与实际提供药品之间的成本差异。数据收集于2021年2月至3月期间。
常见门诊疾病或症状的社会成本差异显著,每例从642孟加拉塔卡到1384孟加拉塔卡不等。产前护理的成本负担最高,为1384孟加拉塔卡,其次是呼吸道疾病,为783孟加拉塔卡,尿路感染为670孟加拉塔卡。平均而言,提供者治疗一名门诊患者花费289孟加拉塔卡,而患者自付费用为446孟加拉塔卡。此外,患者预计平均花费341孟加拉塔卡购买UzHC机构未提供的药品。
我们的研究发现,UzHC机构规定药品与实际提供药品之间存在显著差距,导致患者自付费用更高。当前的医疗资源分配策略未考虑基层医疗保健机构的门诊负担和医疗需求,这进一步加剧了这一差距。解决这一差距需要在医疗融资策略中从根本上转向需求驱动的资源分配模式,以改善医疗服务可及性并实现全民健康。