Paul C. Lauterbur Research Centre for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Guangdong, 518055, China.
Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, China.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Nov 21;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0583-y.
Myocardial edema in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is commonly imaged using dark-blood short tau inversion recovery turbo spin echo (STIR-TSE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The technique is sensitive to cardiac motion and coil sensitivity variation, leading to myocardial signal nonuniformity and impeding reliable depiction of edematous tissues. T-prepared balanced steady state free precession (Tp-bSSFP) imaging has been proposed, but its contrast is low, and averaging is commonly needed. T mapping is useful but requires a long scan time and breathholding. We propose here a single-shot magnetization prepared sequence that increases the contrast between edema and normal myocardium and apply it to myocardial edema imaging.
A magnetization preparation module (TSTIR) is designed to exploit the simultaneous elevation of T and T in edema to improve the depiction of edematous myocardium. The module tips magnetization down to the -z axis after T preparation. Transverse magnetization is sampled at the fat null point using bSSFP readout and allows for single-shot myocardial edema imaging. The sequence (TSTIR-bSSFP) was studied for its contrast behavior using simulation and phantoms. It was then evaluated on 7 healthy subjects and 7 AMI patients by comparing it to Tp-bSSFP and T mapping using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the contrast ratio as performance indices.
In simulation and phantom studies, TSTIR-bSSFP had improved contrast between edema and normal myocardium compared with the other two edema imaging techniques. In patients, the CNR of TSTIR-bSSFP was higher than Tp-bSSFP (5.9 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.0, P < 0.05) but had no significant difference compared with that of the T map (T map: 6.6 ± 3.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.6, P = 0.62). The contrast ratio of TSTIR-bSSFP (2.4 ± 0.8) was higher than that of the T map (1.3 ± 0.1, P < 0.01) and Tp-bSSFP (1.4 ± 0.5, P < 0.05).
TSTIR-bSSFP has improved contrast between edematous and normal myocardium compared with commonly used bSSFP-based edema imaging techniques. TSTIR-bSSFP also differentiates between fat that was robustly suppressed and fluids around the heart. The technique is useful for single-shot edema imaging in AMI patients.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的心肌水肿通常采用黑血短 tau 反转恢复涡轮自旋回波(STIR-TSE)心血管磁共振(CMR)进行成像。该技术对心脏运动和线圈灵敏度变化敏感,导致心肌信号不均匀,难以可靠描绘水肿组织。已提出 T 预备平衡稳态自由进动(Tp-bSSFP)成像,但对比度低,通常需要平均。T 映射虽然有用,但需要较长的扫描时间和屏气。我们在此提出一种单次激发磁化准备序列,以增加水肿与正常心肌之间的对比度,并将其应用于心肌水肿成像。
设计了一种磁化准备模块(TSTIR),以利用水肿时 T 和 T 同时升高的特性来改善水肿心肌的描绘。该模块在 T 预备后将磁化指向-z 轴。使用 bSSFP 读出采集横向磁化,在脂肪零点处采样,实现单次激发心肌水肿成像。使用模拟和体模研究了该序列(TSTIR-bSSFP)的对比度行为。然后,通过比较 Tp-bSSFP 和 T 映射的对比噪声比(CNR)和对比度比作为性能指标,在 7 名健康受试者和 7 名 AMI 患者中对其进行了评估。
在模拟和体模研究中,与其他两种水肿成像技术相比,TSTIR-bSSFP 具有更好的水肿与正常心肌之间的对比度。在患者中,TSTIR-bSSFP 的 CNR 高于 Tp-bSSFP(5.9±2.6 比 2.8±2.0,P<0.05),但与 T 图无显著差异(T 图:6.6±3.3 比 5.9±2.6,P=0.62)。TSTIR-bSSFP 的对比度比(2.4±0.8)高于 T 图(1.3±0.1,P<0.01)和 Tp-bSSFP(1.4±0.5,P<0.05)。
与常用的基于 bSSFP 的水肿成像技术相比,TSTIR-bSSFP 具有更好的水肿与正常心肌之间的对比度。TSTIR-bSSFP 还能区分心脏周围的脂肪和液体。该技术可用于 AMI 患者的单次激发水肿成像。