School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China; School of Management, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang, China.
School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 15;708:134657. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134657. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
China has established the River Chief System (RCS) to develop mechanisms to achieve success in cross-regional negotiations of the Sustainable Water Resource Management Affairs (SWRMA). This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms developed by RCS and social welfare brought by RCS in China, and thereafter put forward suggestions for the future development of RCS. Therefore, a one-stage cooperation game was used to investigate cross-regional SWRMA negotiations with RCS. The results showed that RCS ensures that cooperative solutions are chosen in cross-regional SWRMA negotiations. Moreover, this paper used a two-stage game to explore cross-regional SWRMA negotiations without involving RCS. In this case, the involvement of the upper-level administrators and the probability of a successful negotiation are endogenously determined by local authorities. The results showed that in cross-regional SWRMA negotiations, both when the upper-level administrators are involved in the first stage and in the second stage, the cooperative solutions would be adopted. Thus, RCS is an inevitable outcome of the cross-regional SWRMA negotiations. In addition, RCS could help to avoid transactional costs and external costs in cross-regional SWRMA negotiations. Based on these results, this study provided the following suggestions: the river chief and local authorities of RCS should be stakeholders; the major members of RCS should be the local authorities influenced mostly by SWRMA quantities; RCS should actively advertise the benefits and the cost-down of SWRMA.
中国建立了河长制(RCS)来制定机制,以实现跨区域可持续水资源管理事务(SWRMA)谈判的成功。本文旨在研究 RCS 制定的机制以及 RCS 给中国带来的社会福利,并在此基础上提出 RCS 的未来发展建议。因此,采用单阶段合作博弈来研究有 RCS 的跨区域 SWRMA 谈判。结果表明,RCS 确保了在跨区域 SWRMA 谈判中选择合作解决方案。此外,本文还使用两阶段博弈来探讨不涉及 RCS 的跨区域 SWRMA 谈判。在这种情况下,上级管理人员的参与度和谈判成功的概率是由地方当局内生决定的。结果表明,在跨区域 SWRMA 谈判中,无论是上级管理人员在第一阶段还是第二阶段参与,都会采取合作解决方案。因此,RCS 是跨区域 SWRMA 谈判的必然结果。此外,RCS 可以帮助避免跨区域 SWRMA 谈判中的交易成本和外部成本。基于这些结果,本研究提出了以下建议:RCS 的河长和地方当局应成为利益相关者;RCS 的主要成员应是受 SWRMA 数量影响最大的地方当局;RCS 应积极宣传 SWRMA 的效益和成本降低。