SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa; Applied and Environmental Microbiology Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Fort Hare, Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Ondo State, Nigeria.
SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Centre, University of Fort Hare, Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa; Applied and Environmental Microbiology Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Fort Hare, Alice, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Environ Pollut. 2020 Feb;257:113493. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113493. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
Antibiotic resistance is known to impact treatment efficiency of Plesiomonas infections negatively with fatal outcomes. This study investigated antibiogram fingerprint of P. shigelloides (n = 182) isolated from three South Africa rivers using the disc diffusion technique. Environmental pollution and analogous health risk (given infections) that could associate with the freshwaters and empirical treatment of Plesiomonas were assessed using Antibiotic Resistance Index (ARI) and Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Indices (MARI), respectively. Thirteen EUCAST recommended (ERAs) and eleven non-recommended antibiotics (NAs) used as first line agents in the treatment of gastroenteritis and extraintestinal infections were tested. Resistance against ERAs decreased from cefoxitin (37.91%), cefuroxime (35.17%), cefepime (31.87%), ceftriaxone (29.67%), ciprofloxacin (18.13%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (10.44%), piperacillin/tazobactam (8.79%), ertapenem (4.95%), norfloxacin (4.40%), levofloxacin (2.75%), meropenem (1.10%) to imipenem (0.55%). The isolates had higher resistance (≥36.07%) against NAs but were susceptible to amikacin (67.58%), gentamycin (73.08%), and tetracycline (80.77%). MARI of the isolates were significantly different between ERAs and NAs (P-value < 0.05) and had an average of 0.17 ± 0.18 and 0.45 ± 0.13, respectively. About 33.87% and 95.63% of the isolates had MARI value from 0.23 to 0.62 and 0.27-0.82 to ERAs and NAs, respectively. Also, ERAs-based and NAs-based ARI across sampling units showed significantly different (P-value < 0.05) means of 0.18 ± 0.09 and 0.46 ± 0.05, respectively. MARI attributed low risk of empirical treatment to recommended antibiotics but higher risk to non-recommended antibiotics. Model estimated successful and unsuccessful empirical treatment of infections risks due to resistance in the isolates using recommended antibiotics as 65.93% and 34.07%, respectively; 1.65% and 98.35% in the case of non-recommended antibiotics, respectively. ARI based on recommended antibiotics identified potential environmental pollutions in a number of sites. Resistance in freshwater P. shigelloides especially against cephalosporin, quinolones and fluoroquinolones is distressing and might suggests high pollution of the freshwaters in the Eastern Cape Province.
耐抗生素性已知会对类志贺邻单胞菌感染的治疗效果产生负面影响,导致致命后果。本研究采用纸片扩散技术,对来自南非三条河流的 182 株类志贺邻单胞菌进行了抗生素耐药性指纹图谱分析。使用抗生素耐药指数(ARI)和多重抗生素耐药指数(MARI)分别评估了与淡水相关的环境污染和类似的健康风险(考虑到感染),以及对类志贺邻单胞菌的经验性治疗。本研究共检测了 13 种欧盟推荐的(ERAs)和 11 种非推荐的抗生素(NAs),这些抗生素被用作治疗胃肠炎和肠道外感染的一线药物。对 ERAs 的耐药性从头孢西丁(37.91%)、头孢呋辛(35.17%)、头孢吡肟(31.87%)、头孢曲松(29.67%)、环丙沙星(18.13%)、复方新诺明(10.44%)、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(8.79%)、厄他培南(4.95%)、诺氟沙星(4.40%)、左氧氟沙星(2.75%)、美罗培南(1.10%)降至亚胺培南(0.55%)。这些分离株对 NAs 的耐药性(≥36.07%)较高,但对阿米卡星(67.58%)、庆大霉素(73.08%)和四环素(80.77%)敏感。分离株的 MARI 在 ERAs 和 NAs 之间有显著差异(P 值<0.05),平均值分别为 0.17±0.18 和 0.45±0.13。大约 33.87%和 95.63%的分离株的 MARI 值在 0.23 到 0.62 和 0.27 到 0.82 之间,分别对应 ERAs 和 NAs。此外,基于 ERAs 和 NAs 的 ARI 在采样单位之间显示出显著不同的均值(P 值<0.05),分别为 0.18±0.09 和 0.46±0.05。MARI 表明,推荐的抗生素治疗的低风险,但非推荐的抗生素治疗的风险较高。模型估计,由于分离株的耐药性,推荐抗生素治疗感染的成功率和失败率分别为 65.93%和 34.07%;而非推荐抗生素的成功率和失败率分别为 1.65%和 98.35%。基于推荐抗生素的 ARI 确定了一些地点的潜在环境污染。类志贺邻单胞菌特别是对头孢菌素、喹诺酮类和氟喹诺酮类的耐药性令人担忧,这可能表明东开普省的淡水受到了高度污染。