Kayode Adeoye John, Okoh Anthony Ifeanyi
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Research Group (AEMREG), Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
SAMRC Microbial Water Quality Monitoring Center, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
Foods. 2023 Mar 22;12(6):1346. doi: 10.3390/foods12061346.
Antimicrobial resistance is an existential threat to the health sector, with far-reaching consequences in managing microbial infections. In this study, one hundred and ninety-four isolates were profiled for susceptibility using disc diffusion techniques. Possible foodborne listeriosis risk associated with ready-to-eat (RTE) foods (RTEF) and the risk of empirical treatment (EMPT) of infections, using multiple antimicrobial resistance indices (MARI) and antimicrobial resistance indices (ARI), respectively, were investigated. Twelve European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) prescribed/recommended antimicrobials (EPAS) for the treatment of listeriosis and ten non-prescribed antimicrobials (non-PAS)] were evaluated. Antimicrobial resistance > 50% against PAs including sulfamethoxazole (61.86%), trimethoprim (56.19%), amoxicillin (42.27%), penicillin (41.24%), and erythromycin (40.21%) was observed. Resistance > 50% against non-PAS, including oxytetracycline (60.89%), cefotetan (59.28%), ceftriaxone (53.09%), and streptomycin (40.21%) was also observed. About 55.67% and 65.46% of the isolates had MARI scores ranging from 0.25-0.92 and 0.30-0.70 for EPAs and non-PAs, respectively. There was a significant difference ( < 0.01) between the MARI scores of the isolates for EPAs and non-PAs (means of 0.27 ± 0.21 and 0.31 ± 0.14, respectively). MARI/ARI scores above the Krumperman permissible threshold (>0.2) suggested a high risk/level of antimicrobial-resistant The MARI risks of the non-success of empirical treatment (EMPT) attributed to EPAs and non-PAs were generally high (55.67% and 65.463%, respectively) due to the antimicrobial resistance of the isolates. MARI-based estimated success and non-success of EMPT if EUCAST-prescribed antimicrobials were administered for the treatment of listeriosis were 44.329% and 55.67%, respectively. The EMPT if non-prescribed antimicrobials were administered for the treatment of listeriosis was 34.53% and 65.46%, respectively. This indicates a potentially high risk with PAs and non-PAs for the treatment of infection. Furthermore, ARI scores ≤ 0.2 for EPAs were observed in polony, potato chips, muffins, and assorted sandwiches, whereas ARI scores for non-PAs were >0.2 across all the RTE food types. The ARI-based estimate identified potential risks associated with some RTE foods, including fried fish, red Vienna sausage, Russian sausage, fruit salad, bread, meat pies, fried chicken, cupcakes, and vetkoek. This investigation identified a high risk of EMPT due to the presence of antimicrobial-resistant in RTE foods, which could result in severe health consequences.
抗菌药物耐药性是卫生部门面临的生存威胁,对微生物感染的管理具有深远影响。在本研究中,使用纸片扩散法对194株分离株进行了药敏分析。分别使用多重抗菌药物耐药指数(MARI)和抗菌药物耐药指数(ARI),调查了即食食品(RTEF)可能存在的食源性李斯特菌病风险以及感染的经验性治疗(EMPT)风险。评估了欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)规定/推荐的用于治疗李斯特菌病的12种抗菌药物(EPAS)和10种非规定抗菌药物(非PAS)。观察到对包括磺胺甲恶唑(61.86%)、甲氧苄啶(56.19%)、阿莫西林(42.27%)、青霉素(41.24%)和红霉素(40.21%)在内的PAS的抗菌药物耐药率>50%。还观察到对包括土霉素(60.89%)、头孢替坦(59.28%)、头孢曲松(53.09%)和链霉素(40.21%)在内的非PAS的耐药率>50%。分别约有55.67%和65.46%的分离株,其针对EPAS和非PAS的MARI评分范围为0.25 - 0.92和0.30 - 0.70。分离株针对EPAS和非PAS的MARI评分之间存在显著差异(<0.01)(分别为0.27±0.21和0.31±0.14)。高于Krumperman允许阈值(>0.2)的MARI/ARI评分表明抗菌药物耐药风险/水平较高。由于分离株的抗菌药物耐药性,归因于EPAS和非PAS的经验性治疗失败(EMPT)的MARI风险普遍较高(分别为55.67%和65.463%)。如果使用EUCAST规定的抗菌药物治疗李斯特菌病,基于MARI估计的EMPT成功和失败概率分别为44.329%和55.67%。如果使用非规定抗菌药物治疗李斯特菌病,EMPT的概率分别为34.53%和65.46%。这表明使用PAS和非PAS治疗感染存在潜在高风险。此外,在波兰香肠、薯片、松饼和什锦三明治中观察到针对EPAS的ARI评分≤0.2,而在所有RTE食品类型中,针对非PAS的ARI评分>0.2。基于ARI的评估确定了与一些RTE食品相关的潜在风险,包括炸鱼、维也纳红肠、俄罗斯香肠、水果沙拉、面包、肉馅饼、炸鸡、纸杯蛋糕和vetkoek。这项调查发现,由于RTE食品中存在抗菌药物耐药菌,EMPT风险很高,这可能导致严重的健康后果。