Suppr超能文献

射频消融联合泡沫硬化剂治疗静脉曲张术后压迫与非压迫的随机对照非劣效性试验。

Post-procedural Compression vs. No Compression After Radiofrequency Ablation and Concomitant Foam Sclerotherapy of Varicose Veins: A Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Finland; Medical Research Centre Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Jan;59(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare post-operative compression with no compression, after radiofrequency endothermal ablation (RFA) of a truncal varicose vein and concomitant foam sclerotherapy of the tributaries.

METHODS

This prospective randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial recruited patients from two centres in Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland. Patients with clinical class C2-C4 chronic venous disease were randomised to receive no compression after the operation, or to receive compression stockings continuously for two days, and then, during the daytime for five days. In follow up visits, additional foam sclerotherapy was performed for symptoms of distal incompetence. Patients were followed up for six months. The primary outcome was occlusion of the RFA treated truncal vein at six months. Secondary outcomes were return to full activity within 14 days, Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, post-operative pain, need for painkillers, and postprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Of 177 included patients, 90 were allocated to post-operative compression and 87 to no compression. At six months, both groups showed 100% occlusion rates in RFA treated truncal veins (95% confidence interval -0.043-0.042). Within 14 days of treatment, full physical activity was achieved by 87% of the compression group and 81% of the no compression group, (p = .29). At six months, the AVVQ scores were comparable and significantly improved in both groups, compared with baseline. Pain scores were comparable between groups, in day to day analyses, and they were significantly lower in both groups on day 10, compared with pre-operative pain caused by varicose veins. On average, post-operative pain medication was used for 2.3 days and for 2.8 days in the compression and no compression groups, respectively (p = .28). Complications throughout the six month follow up were comparable between groups, although skin rash/blisters occurred more often in the compression group (p = .01).

CONCLUSION

After treating C2-C4 varicose veins with RFA and concomitant foam sclerotherapy, no post-operative compression was non-inferior to post-operative compression, in terms of safety and efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02890563.

摘要

目的

比较射频热消融(RFA)治疗主干静脉曲张和同时行泡沫硬化剂治疗属支静脉后,术后加压与不加压的效果。

方法

这是一项在芬兰北奥斯特罗波的两个中心进行的前瞻性、随机对照、非劣效性试验,招募了患有临床 C2-C4 慢性静脉疾病的患者。将患者随机分为术后不接受加压治疗或连续两天穿压缩袜,然后白天再穿 5 天。在随访时,如果出现远端功能不全的症状,需要进行额外的泡沫硬化剂治疗。患者随访 6 个月。主要结局是 6 个月时 RFA 治疗的主干静脉闭塞。次要结局包括 14 天内恢复正常活动、Aberdeen 静脉疾病问卷(AVVQ)评分、术后疼痛、需要止痛药和术后并发症。

结果

177 例纳入患者中,90 例接受术后加压治疗,87 例接受不加压治疗。6 个月时,两组 RFA 治疗的主干静脉闭塞率均为 100%(95%置信区间 -0.043-0.042)。治疗后 14 天内,加压组 87%和不加压组 81%的患者能够完全恢复正常活动(p=0.29)。6 个月时,两组的 AVVQ 评分均较基线显著改善,且均有改善。两组日间疼痛评分相似,与术前静脉曲张引起的疼痛相比,两组第 10 天的疼痛评分均显著降低。平均而言,术后疼痛药物的使用时间分别为加压组 2.3 天和不加压组 2.8 天(p=0.28)。整个 6 个月的随访期间,两组的并发症发生率相似,但加压组皮肤皮疹/水疱的发生率更高(p=0.01)。

结论

在使用 RFA 联合泡沫硬化剂治疗 C2-C4 静脉曲张后,与术后加压治疗相比,术后不加压治疗在安全性和疗效方面不劣于后者。临床试验注册编号:NCT02890563。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验