Suppr超能文献

基于分光光度测量的牙龈比色板提案。

Proposal for a gingival shade guide based on spectrophotometric measurements.

作者信息

Gomez Polo Cristina, Montero Javier, Martin Casado Ana Maria

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, University of Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Oct;11(5):239-246. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.239. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to propose and assess a shade guide for pink gingival aesthetics using a Spanish population sample.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The L, C, h, a and b coordinates of 259 participants were measured using a spectrophotometer in 3 standardized points along the attached gingiva of the maxillary central incisors. A hierarchical clustering analysis was applied to obtain separate solutions regarding the number of shade tabs. For each of the solutions obtained, color differences (ΔE) were calculated using the CIELab and CIEDE2000 formulas, and the proposed shade guide was selected considering (1) the color differences between tabs and (2) the coverage error of each of the solutions.

RESULTS

The proposed shade guide consisted of 8 gingival shade tabs and achieved CIELab and CIEDE2000 coverage errors of less than the respective 50:50% acceptability thresholds (ΔE=4.6 units and ΔE=4.1). The coordinates for the various gingival shade tabs were as follows: Tab 1: L43.3, a21.9, b12.3 (1.6); Tab 2: L42.9, a34.1, b19.1; Tab 3: L46.5, a25.8, b10.9; Tab 4: L46.5, a27.3, b15.1; Tab 5: L49.6, a23.5, b16.8; Tab 6: L51.5, a19.7, b13.6; Tab 7: L55.9, a22.0, b 15.0; and Tab 8: L56.0, a19.9, b18.8.

CONCLUSION

The CIELab and CIEDE2000 coverage errors for the 8 shade tabs of the proposed gingival shade guide were significantly lower than those of other guides. Therefore, despite the limitations of this study, the proposed guide is more appropriate for matching gingival shade in the Spanish general population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提出并评估一种针对粉红色牙龈美学的比色板,使用西班牙人群样本。

材料与方法

使用分光光度计在259名参与者上颌中切牙附着龈的3个标准化点测量L、C、h、a和b坐标。应用层次聚类分析以获得关于色标数量的不同解决方案。对于获得的每个解决方案,使用CIELab和CIEDE2000公式计算颜色差异(ΔE),并考虑(1)色标之间的颜色差异和(2)每个解决方案的覆盖误差来选择提议的比色板。

结果

提议的比色板由8个牙龈色标组成,CIELab和CIEDE2000的覆盖误差低于各自50:50%的可接受阈值(ΔE = 4.6单位和ΔE = 4.1)。各个牙龈色标的坐标如下:色标1:L43.3,a21.9,b12.3(1.6);色标2:L42.9,a34.1,b19.1;色标3:L46.5,a25.8,b10.9;色标4:L46.5,a27.3,b15.1;色标5:L49.6,a23.5,b16.8;色标6:L51.5,a19.7,b13.6;色标7:L55.9,a22.0,b 15.0;色标8:L56.0,a19.9,b18.8。

结论

提议的牙龈比色板的8个色标的CIELab和CIEDE2000覆盖误差显著低于其他比色板。因此,尽管本研究存在局限性,但提议的比色板更适合匹配西班牙普通人群的牙龈颜色。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b40/6856309/b11a96821c69/jap-11-239-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验