Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Virchows Arch. 2020 Feb;476(2):251-260. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02694-7. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
In rare cases, equivocal histomorphology ('deceiving dysplasia') does not allow immediate diagnosis of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). We studied whether these cases are correlated with specific high-risk human papillomavirus (hr HPV) types. During 2011-2017, 39 cases of p16-positive cervical tissue biopsies with unusual ('deceiving') dysplastic histomorphology were identified and matched with the same number of controls (typical HSIL samples). Histomorphological characteristics were reviewed blindly and HPV testing was performed using the clinically validated RealTime test (Abbott) and Anyplex HPV 28 (Seegene). HPV 16 and HPV 31 were the two most frequent HPV types in both groups, although minimum, proportional, hierarchical and any etiological attribution estimates for HPV 16 were significantly lower in the deceiving group (13.2%, 21.3%, 23.7% and 23.7%) than in the control group (32.4%, 48.1%, 48.6% and 48.6%). In addition, the distribution of other hr HPV types differed between the two study groups, with five HPV types (HPV 56, 58, 59, 73 and 82) detected only in the deceiving group. Histomorphologic review of both groups (regardless of HPV type) confirmed significant differences in nuclear atypia, maximum lesion thickness and cellularity, although these were diminished when cross-comparisons between HPV16/18 and non-HPV16/18 cases pooled from both study groups were evaluated. Different attribution estimates for HPV 16, HPV 16/18 and non-16/18 hr HPV types in deceiving and control groups were observed, in particular for HPV 16. However, an unusual (deceiving) histomorphology may also depend on unknown HPV-related molecular changes.
在极少数情况下,模棱两可的组织形态学(“欺骗性发育不良”)不允许立即诊断宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)。我们研究了这些病例是否与特定的高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hr HPV)类型有关。在 2011 年至 2017 年期间,发现了 39 例 p16 阳性宫颈组织活检,具有不寻常(“欺骗性”)的发育不良组织形态学特征,并与相同数量的对照(典型 HSIL 样本)相匹配。组织形态学特征进行了盲法审查,并使用经过临床验证的 RealTime 测试(雅培)和 Anyplex HPV 28(Seegene)进行 HPV 检测。HPV 16 和 HPV 31 是两组中最常见的 HPV 类型,尽管在欺骗组中 HPV 16 的最小、比例、分层和任何病因归因估计值(13.2%、21.3%、23.7%和 23.7%)明显低于对照组(32.4%、48.1%、48.6%和 48.6%)。此外,两组之间其他 hr HPV 类型的分布也不同,有五种 HPV 类型(HPV 56、58、59、73 和 82)仅在欺骗组中检测到。对两组(无论 HPV 类型如何)的组织形态学回顾均证实核异型性、最大病变厚度和细胞密度存在显著差异,尽管当将两组研究中 HPV16/18 和非 HPV16/18 病例进行交叉比较时,这些差异会减小。在欺骗组和对照组中,HPV 16、HPV 16/18 和非 16/18 hr HPV 类型的不同归因估计值观察到,特别是对于 HPV 16。然而,不寻常的(欺骗性)组织形态学也可能取决于未知的 HPV 相关分子变化。