Suppr超能文献

在急性心肌炎和非 ST 段心肌梗死的诊断中,凝血酶生成试验的作用。

Role of thrombin generation assays in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis and non-ST myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Heart Institute, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.

Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jul;50(1):144-150. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01996-6.

Abstract

Myocarditis and myocardial infarction share a common clinical characteristics despite significant differences in etiology and pathogenesis. Current guidelines recommend using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endocardial biopsy for a definite diagnosis; however, these guidelines are not fully implemented due to the high cost and low availability. We used a thrombin generation assay and simple blood test to characterize both diseases. We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to December 2018. Patients with initial clinical suspicions of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or myocarditis were eligible. All patients were recruited prior to anticoagulant treatment. Patients in both groups underwent acceptable standard clinical evaluation. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled; 12 patients in the NSTEMI group and 16 in the myocarditis group. Patients in the NSTEMI group were significantly older than those in the myocarditis group (64.25 ± 9.67 vs. 37.94 ± 19.66 years, p < 0.01, respectively) with a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease (p < 0.01 for all). There was no difference between the groups regarding INR, PT, aPTT, and serum levels of creatinine, urea, CPK, troponin, and fibrinogen. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), which represents the total thrombin concentration in the plasma, was significantly higher in the myocarditis group than in the NSTEMI group (2091.88 ± 336.41 vs. 1860.75 ± 438.02 nM × min, p < 0.03). Myocarditis and myocardial infarction have a different pattern of thrombin generation Thrombogram. The myocarditis group had significantly higher plasma ETP than the NSTEMI group. This finding requires further evaluation to define a numerical threshold, thus avoiding invasive or expensive assessment of myocarditis.

摘要

心肌炎和心肌梗死尽管在病因和发病机制上有显著差异,但具有共同的临床特征。目前的指南建议使用心脏磁共振成像(MRI)或心内膜活检进行明确诊断;然而,由于成本高和可用性低,这些指南并未得到充分实施。我们使用凝血酶生成试验和简单的血液测试来描述这两种疾病。我们进行了一项横断面研究,时间为 2018 年 4 月至 12 月。最初临床怀疑非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或心肌炎的患者符合入选条件。所有患者在抗凝治疗前均接受了检测。两组患者均接受了可接受的标准临床评估。共纳入 28 例患者;NSTEMI 组 12 例,心肌炎组 16 例。NSTEMI 组患者明显比心肌炎组患者年龄大(64.25±9.67 岁比 37.94±19.66 岁,p<0.01),且高脂血症、糖尿病和缺血性心脏病的患病率更高(均为 p<0.01)。两组间国际标准化比值(INR)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)、血清肌酐、尿素、肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)、肌钙蛋白和纤维蛋白原水平无差异。内源性凝血酶潜能(ETP)代表血浆中总凝血酶浓度,心肌炎组明显高于 NSTEMI 组(2091.88±336.41 纳摩尔×分钟比 1860.75±438.02 纳摩尔×分钟,p<0.03)。心肌炎和心肌梗死的凝血酶生成模式不同。心肌炎组的血浆 ETP 明显高于 NSTEMI 组。这一发现需要进一步评估以确定数值阈值,从而避免对心肌炎进行有创或昂贵的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验