Berezin Alexander E, Berezin Alexander A
Internal Medicine Department, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, State Medical University, Zaporozhye, 69035, Ukraine.
Internal Medicine Department, Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Zaporozhye, 69096, Ukraine.
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(6):1271-1291. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00835-9. Epub 2020 May 19.
The aim of this narrative review is to update the current knowledge on the differential choice of circulating cardiac biomarkers in patients with prediabetes and established type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). There are numerous circulating biomarkers with unconfirmed abilities to predict clinical outcomes in pre-DM and DM individuals; the prognostication ability of the cardiac biomarkers reported here has been established, and they are still being studied. The conventional cardiac biomarkers, such as natriuretic peptides (NPs), soluble suppressor tumorigenisity-2, high-sensitivity circulating cardiac troponins and galectin-3, were useful to ascertain cardiovascular (CV) risk. Each cardiac biomarker has its strengths and weaknesses that affect the price of usage, specificity, sensitivity, predictive value and superiority in face-to-face comparisons. Additionally, there have been confusing reports regarding their abilities to be predictably relevant among patients without known CV disease. The large spectrum of promising cardiac biomarkers (growth/differential factor-15, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, cardiotrophin-1, carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type 1, apelin and non-coding RNAs) is discussed in the context of predicting CV diseases and events in patients with known prediabetes and T2DM. Various reasons have been critically discussed related to the variable findings regarding biomarker-based prediction of CV risk among patients with metabolic disease. It was found that NPs and hs-cTnT are still the most important tools that have an affordable price as well as high sensitivity and specificity to predict clinical outcomes among patients with pre-DM and DM in routine clinical practice, but other circulating biomarkers need to be carefully investigated in large trials in the future.
本叙述性综述的目的是更新目前关于糖尿病前期和确诊2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者循环心脏生物标志物差异选择的知识。有许多循环生物标志物在糖尿病前期和糖尿病个体中预测临床结局的能力尚未得到证实;本文报道的心脏生物标志物的预后能力已经得到确立,并且仍在研究中。传统的心脏生物标志物,如利钠肽(NPs)、可溶性肿瘤抑制因子2、高敏循环心肌肌钙蛋白和半乳糖凝集素-3,有助于确定心血管(CV)风险。每种心脏生物标志物都有其优缺点,这些优缺点会影响其使用价格、特异性、敏感性、预测价值以及在面对面比较中的优势。此外,关于它们在无已知CV疾病患者中可预测相关性的能力,也有令人困惑的报道。本文在预测已知糖尿病前期和T2DM患者的CV疾病和事件的背景下,讨论了一系列有前景的心脏生物标志物(生长/分化因子-15、心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白、心肌营养素-1、I型胶原羧基末端肽、apelin和非编码RNA)。对于代谢疾病患者中基于生物标志物预测CV风险的不同研究结果,已经进行了批判性讨论,并分析了各种相关原因。研究发现,在常规临床实践中,NPs和hs-cTnT仍然是预测糖尿病前期和糖尿病患者临床结局的最重要工具,它们价格合理,且具有高敏感性和特异性,但未来需要在大型试验中对其他循环生物标志物进行仔细研究。