Department of Emergency Medicine, Franz Tappeiner Hospital of Merano, Azienda Sanitaria Dell'Alto Adige, Merano, Bolzano, Italy.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Intern Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;15(2):311-318. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02229-7. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
More clinical data are required on the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although patients treated with warfarin and DOACs have a similar risk of bleeding, short-term mortality after a gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) episode in DOAC-treated patients has not been clarified. The objective of this study was to assess differences in 30-day mortality in patients treated with DOACs or warfarin admitted to the emergency department (ED) for GIB. This was a multicentre retrospective study conducted over 2 years. The study included patients evaluated at three different EDs for GIB. The baseline characteristics were included. Subsequently, we assessed the differences in past medical history and clinical data between the two study groups (DOAC and warfarin users). Differences between the two groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Among the 284 patients presenting GIB enrolled in the study period, 39.4% (112/284) were treated with DOACs and 60.6% (172/284) were treated with warfarin. Overall, 8.1% (23/284) of patients died within 30 days. Among the 172 warfarin-treated patients, 8.7% (15/172) died within 30 days from ED evaluation. In the 112 DOAC-treated patients, the mortality rate was 7.1% (8/112). The Cox regression analysis, adjusted for possible clinical confounders, and the Kaplan-Meier curves did not outline differences between the two treatment groups. The present study shows no differences between DOACs and warfarin in short-term mortality after GIB.
需要更多关于直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 的安全性的临床数据。尽管接受华法林和 DOAC 治疗的患者出血风险相似,但 DOAC 治疗患者发生胃肠道出血 (GIB) 后短期死亡率尚未明确。本研究的目的是评估因 GIB 入住急诊科 (ED) 接受 DOAC 或华法林治疗的患者在 30 天死亡率方面的差异。这是一项进行了 2 年的多中心回顾性研究。该研究纳入了在三个不同的 ED 因 GIB 进行评估的患者。纳入了基线特征。随后,我们评估了两组(DOAC 和华法林使用者)之间既往病史和临床数据的差异。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线评估两组之间的差异。在研究期间纳入的 284 例 GIB 患者中,39.4%(112/284)接受 DOAC 治疗,60.6%(172/284)接受华法林治疗。总体而言,8.1%(23/284)的患者在 30 天内死亡。在 172 例接受华法林治疗的患者中,15 例(15/172)在 ED 评估后 30 天内死亡。在 112 例接受 DOAC 治疗的患者中,死亡率为 7.1%(8/112)。Cox 回归分析,调整了可能的临床混杂因素,以及 Kaplan-Meier 曲线,均未显示两组治疗之间的差异。本研究表明 DOAC 和华法林在 GIB 后短期死亡率方面没有差异。