Jacobs Victoria, May Heidi T, Bair Tami L, Crandall Brian G, Cutler Michael J, Day John D, Mallender Charles, Osborn Jeffrey S, Stevens Scott M, Weiss J Peter, Woller Scott C, Bunch T Jared
Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.
Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;118(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.039. Epub 2016 May 5.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used in clinical practice in the United States for the last 4 to 6 years. Although DOACs may be an attractive alternative to warfarin in many patients, long-term outcomes of use of these medications are unknown. We performed a propensity-matched analysis to report patient important outcomes of death, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), bleeding, major bleeding, and dementia in patients taking a DOAC or warfarin. Patients receiving long-term anticoagulation from June 2010 to December 2014 for thromboembolism prevention with either warfarin or a DOAC were matched 1:1 by index date and propensity score. Multivariable Cox hazard regression was performed to determine the risk of death, stroke/TIA, major bleed, and dementia by the anticoagulant therapy received. A total of 5,254 patients were studied (2,627 per group). Average age was 72.4 ± 10.9 years, and 59.0% were men. Most patients were receiving long-term anticoagulation for AF management (warfarin: 96.5% vs DOAC: 92.7%, p <0.0001). Rivaroxaban (55.3%) was the most commonly used DOAC, followed by apixaban (22.5%) and dabigatran (22.2%). The use of DOACs compared with warfarin was associated with a reduced risk of long-term adverse outcomes: death (p = 0.09), stroke/TIA (p <0.0001), major bleed (p <0.0001), and bleed (p = 0.14). No significant outcome variance was noted in DOAC-type comparison. In the AF multivariable model patients taking DOAC were 43% less likely to develop stroke/TIA/dementia (hazard ratio 0.57 [CI 0.17, 1.97], p = 0.38) than those taking warfarin. Our community-based results suggest better long-term efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin. DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of cerebral ischemic events and new-onset dementia.
在过去4至6年中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)已在美国临床实践中得到应用。尽管在许多患者中,DOACs可能是华法林的一个有吸引力的替代药物,但这些药物长期使用的结果尚不清楚。我们进行了一项倾向匹配分析,以报告服用DOAC或华法林的患者的重要结局,包括死亡、中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、出血、大出血和痴呆。2010年6月至2014年12月期间接受长期抗凝治疗以预防血栓栓塞的患者,使用华法林或DOAC的患者按索引日期和倾向评分进行1:1匹配。采用多变量Cox风险回归分析,以确定接受抗凝治疗后死亡、中风/TIA、大出血和痴呆的风险。共研究了5254例患者(每组2627例)。平均年龄为72.4±10.9岁,男性占59.0%。大多数患者因房颤管理接受长期抗凝治疗(华法林:96.5% vs DOAC:92.7%,p<0.0001)。利伐沙班(55.3%)是最常用的DOAC,其次是阿哌沙班(22.5%)和达比加群(22.2%)。与华法林相比,使用DOACs与长期不良结局风险降低相关:死亡(p=0.09)、中风/TIA(p<0.0001)、大出血(p<0.0001)和出血(p=0.14)。在DOAC类型比较中未发现显著的结局差异。在房颤多变量模型中,服用DOAC的患者发生中风/TIA/痴呆的可能性比服用华法林的患者低43%(风险比0.57[CI 0.17,1.97],p=0.38)。我们基于社区的结果表明,与华法林相比,DOACs具有更好的长期疗效和安全性。使用DOACs与较低的脑缺血事件和新发痴呆风险相关。