Suppr超能文献

在长期接受抗凝治疗的房颤患者中,直接口服抗凝剂与华法林相比的基于人群的长期脑缺血事件及认知结局

Long-Term Population-Based Cerebral Ischemic Event and Cognitive Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin Among Long-term Anticoagulated Patients for Atrial Fibrillation.

作者信息

Jacobs Victoria, May Heidi T, Bair Tami L, Crandall Brian G, Cutler Michael J, Day John D, Mallender Charles, Osborn Jeffrey S, Stevens Scott M, Weiss J Peter, Woller Scott C, Bunch T Jared

机构信息

Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.

Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;118(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.039. Epub 2016 May 5.

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used in clinical practice in the United States for the last 4 to 6 years. Although DOACs may be an attractive alternative to warfarin in many patients, long-term outcomes of use of these medications are unknown. We performed a propensity-matched analysis to report patient important outcomes of death, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), bleeding, major bleeding, and dementia in patients taking a DOAC or warfarin. Patients receiving long-term anticoagulation from June 2010 to December 2014 for thromboembolism prevention with either warfarin or a DOAC were matched 1:1 by index date and propensity score. Multivariable Cox hazard regression was performed to determine the risk of death, stroke/TIA, major bleed, and dementia by the anticoagulant therapy received. A total of 5,254 patients were studied (2,627 per group). Average age was 72.4 ± 10.9 years, and 59.0% were men. Most patients were receiving long-term anticoagulation for AF management (warfarin: 96.5% vs DOAC: 92.7%, p <0.0001). Rivaroxaban (55.3%) was the most commonly used DOAC, followed by apixaban (22.5%) and dabigatran (22.2%). The use of DOACs compared with warfarin was associated with a reduced risk of long-term adverse outcomes: death (p = 0.09), stroke/TIA (p <0.0001), major bleed (p <0.0001), and bleed (p = 0.14). No significant outcome variance was noted in DOAC-type comparison. In the AF multivariable model patients taking DOAC were 43% less likely to develop stroke/TIA/dementia (hazard ratio 0.57 [CI 0.17, 1.97], p = 0.38) than those taking warfarin. Our community-based results suggest better long-term efficacy and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin. DOAC use was associated with a lower risk of cerebral ischemic events and new-onset dementia.

摘要

在过去4至6年中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)已在美国临床实践中得到应用。尽管在许多患者中,DOACs可能是华法林的一个有吸引力的替代药物,但这些药物长期使用的结果尚不清楚。我们进行了一项倾向匹配分析,以报告服用DOAC或华法林的患者的重要结局,包括死亡、中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、出血、大出血和痴呆。2010年6月至2014年12月期间接受长期抗凝治疗以预防血栓栓塞的患者,使用华法林或DOAC的患者按索引日期和倾向评分进行1:1匹配。采用多变量Cox风险回归分析,以确定接受抗凝治疗后死亡、中风/TIA、大出血和痴呆的风险。共研究了5254例患者(每组2627例)。平均年龄为72.4±10.9岁,男性占59.0%。大多数患者因房颤管理接受长期抗凝治疗(华法林:96.5% vs DOAC:92.7%,p<0.0001)。利伐沙班(55.3%)是最常用的DOAC,其次是阿哌沙班(22.5%)和达比加群(22.2%)。与华法林相比,使用DOACs与长期不良结局风险降低相关:死亡(p=0.09)、中风/TIA(p<0.0001)、大出血(p<0.0001)和出血(p=0.14)。在DOAC类型比较中未发现显著的结局差异。在房颤多变量模型中,服用DOAC的患者发生中风/TIA/痴呆的可能性比服用华法林的患者低43%(风险比0.57[CI 0.17,1.97],p=0.38)。我们基于社区的结果表明,与华法林相比,DOACs具有更好的长期疗效和安全性。使用DOACs与较低的脑缺血事件和新发痴呆风险相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验