Center for Theragnosis, Biomedical Research Institute , Korea Institute of Science and Technology , Seoul 02792 , Republic of Korea.
Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST , Sungkyunkwan University , Seoul 06351 , Republic of Korea.
Bioconjug Chem. 2019 Dec 18;30(12):3107-3118. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00760. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
Various types of albumin-binding molecules have been conjugated to anticancer drugs, and these modified prodrugs could be effective in cancer treatments compared to free anticancer drugs. However, the tumor targeting of albumin-binding prodrugs has not been clearly investigated. Herein, we examined the in vitro and in vivo tumor-targeting efficiency of three different albumin-binding molecules including albumin-binding peptide (DICLPRWGCLW: PEP), fatty acid (palmitic acid: PA), and maleimide (MI), respectively. In order to characterize the different targeting efficiency of albumin-binding molecules, PEP, PA, or MI was chemically labeled with near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) dye, Cy5.5, in resulting PEP-Cy5.5, PA-Cy5.5, and MI-Cy5.5. These NIRF dye-labeled albumin-binding molecules were physically or chemically bound to albumin via gentle incubation in aqueous conditions in vitro. Notably, PA-Cy5.5 with reversible and multivalent binding affinities formed stable albumin complexes, compared to PEP-Cy5.5 and MI-Cy5.5, confirmed via surface plasmon resonance measurement, gel electrophoresis assay, and albumin-bound column-binding test. In tumor-bearing mice model, the different albumin-binding affinities of PA-Cy5.5, PEP-Cy5.5, and MI-Cy5.5 greatly contributed to their tumor-targeting ability. Even though the binding affinity of PEP-Cy5.5 and MI-Cy5.5 to albumin is higher than that of PA-Cy5.5 in vitro, intravenous PA-Cy5.5 showed a higher tumor-targeting efficiency in tumor-bearing mice compared to that of PEP-Cy5.5 and MI-Cy5.5. The reversible and multivalent affinities of albumin-binding molecules to native serum albumin greatly increased the pharmacokinetics and tumor-targeting efficiency in vivo.
各种类型的白蛋白结合分子已与抗癌药物缀合,与游离抗癌药物相比,这些修饰的前药在癌症治疗中可能更有效。然而,白蛋白结合前药的肿瘤靶向性尚未得到明确研究。在此,我们分别考察了三种不同的白蛋白结合分子(包括白蛋白结合肽(DICLPRWGCLW:PEP)、脂肪酸(棕榈酸:PA)和马来酰亚胺(MI))的体外和体内肿瘤靶向效率。为了表征白蛋白结合分子的不同靶向效率,PEP、PA 或 MI 分别用近红外荧光(NIRF)染料 Cy5.5 化学标记,得到 PEP-Cy5.5、PA-Cy5.5 和 MI-Cy5.5。这些 NIRF 染料标记的白蛋白结合分子在温和的孵育条件下通过物理或化学结合到白蛋白上,在水溶液中体外形成稳定的白蛋白复合物。值得注意的是,与 PEP-Cy5.5 和 MI-Cy5.5 相比,具有可逆和多价结合亲和力的 PA-Cy5.5 形成了稳定的白蛋白复合物,这通过表面等离子体共振测量、凝胶电泳分析和白蛋白结合柱结合试验得到证实。在荷瘤小鼠模型中,PA-Cy5.5、PEP-Cy5.5 和 MI-Cy5.5 的不同白蛋白结合亲和力极大地促进了它们的肿瘤靶向能力。尽管 PEP-Cy5.5 和 MI-Cy5.5 与白蛋白的结合亲和力在体外高于 PA-Cy5.5,但静脉注射 PA-Cy5.5 与 PEP-Cy5.5 和 MI-Cy5.5 相比,在荷瘤小鼠中具有更高的肿瘤靶向效率。白蛋白结合分子与天然血清白蛋白的可逆和多价亲和力极大地增加了体内的药代动力学和肿瘤靶向效率。