Suppr超能文献

对比分析肥胖症患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的效果:来自 11 项随机临床试验的证据(荟萃分析)。

Comparative analysis for the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in patients with morbid obesity: Evidence from 11 randomized clinical trials (meta-analysis).

机构信息

Department of Massage, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM, Tianjin, 300193, China.

Jiren Outpatient Department, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300110, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.013. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are the most common procedures performed during bariatric surgery and both of them have been demonstrated having significant efficacy for morbid obesity. However, the comparative analysis of the effect of them has not been well studied. Thus, this comparative analysis was conducted to determine whether LRYGB and LSG are equivalent for mid- and long-term weight loss, resolution of comorbidities and adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases up to January 1, 2019 for studies that investigated LRYGB and LSG with respect to weight loss outcomes, resolution of comorbidities and AEs. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare the outcomes of the groups. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the trials and extracted the data independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures in Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies (N = 1,328 participants) in this meta-analysis. Our results showed no significant difference in excess weight loss between LRYGB and LSG, with a pooled SMD of -0.16 (95% CI: -0.52-0.19; P = 0.36). Further, the pooled results showed no significant difference in midterm and long-term weight loss between the comparative groups. Similarly, no significant difference was found in T2DM resolution. The pooled results indicate that patients receiving LSG experienced fewer postoperative complications and reoperation rate, with pooled RRs of 1.66 (95% CI: 1.33-2.07; P < 0.00001) and 1.73 (95% CI: 1.14-2.62; P = 0.01). LRYGB may be superior to LSG in dyslipidemia, hypertension and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remission.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis indicated that both LRYGB and LSG are equivalent for excess weight loss and T2DM resolution. However, patients receiving LSG experienced fewer postoperative complications and reoperation rate than those who underwent LRYGB. LRYGB may be superior in dyslipidemia, hypertension and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remission.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)是减重手术中最常见的两种手术,两者均已被证明对病态肥胖具有显著疗效。然而,它们的效果比较分析尚未得到很好的研究。因此,进行了这项比较分析,以确定 LRYGB 和 LSG 在中、长期减重、并发症的解决和不良事件(AEs)方面是否等效。

方法

我们检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库,以获取截至 2019 年 1 月 1 日有关 LRYGB 和 LSG 的研究,这些研究涉及体重减轻结果、并发症的解决和 AEs。使用标准化均数差(SMD)和风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)来比较组间的结果。两位审查员独立评估试验质量并提取数据。所有统计分析均使用 Review Manager 5.2 中的标准统计程序进行。

结果

我们将 11 项研究(N=1328 名参与者)纳入这项荟萃分析。我们的结果显示,LRYGB 和 LSG 之间的超重减轻没有显著差异,合并 SMD 为-0.16(95%CI:-0.52-0.19;P=0.36)。此外,两组之间的中期和长期减重没有显著差异。同样,T2DM 缓解也没有发现显著差异。汇总结果表明,接受 LSG 的患者术后并发症和再次手术率较低,合并 RR 分别为 1.66(95%CI:1.33-2.07;P<0.00001)和 1.73(95%CI:1.14-2.62;P=0.01)。LRYGB 在血脂异常、高血压和胃食管反流病(GERD)缓解方面可能优于 LSG。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,LRYGB 和 LSG 在超重减轻和 T2DM 缓解方面等效。然而,接受 LSG 的患者术后并发症和再次手术率低于接受 LRYGB 的患者。LRYGB 在血脂异常、高血压和胃食管反流病(GERD)缓解方面可能更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验