Suppr超能文献

《欧盟水框架指令下的地表水营养物标准:现状、挑战与未来展望》

Nutrient criteria for surface waters under the European Water Framework Directive: Current state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook.

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), I-21027 Ispra, Italy.

Bowburn Consultancy, 11 Monteigne Drive, Bowburn, Durham DH6 5QB, UK; Department of Geography, Nottingham University, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 10;695:133888. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133888. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

Abstract

The aim of European water policy is to achieve good ecological status in all rivers, lakes, coastal and transitional waters by 2027. Currently, more than half of water bodies are in a degraded condition and nutrient enrichment is one of the main culprits. Therefore, there is a pressing need to establish reliable and comparable nutrient criteria that are consistent with good ecological status. This paper highlights the wide range of nutrient criteria currently in use by Member States of the European Union to support good ecological status and goes on to suggest that inappropriate criteria may be hindering the achievement of good status. Along with a comprehensive overview of nutrient criteria, we provide a critical analysis of the threshold concentrations and approaches by which these are set. We identify four essential issues: (1) Different nutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus) are used for different water categories in different countries. (2) The use of different nutrient fractions (total, dissolved inorganic) and statistical summary metrics (e.g., mean, percentiles, seasonal, annual) currently hampers comparability between countries, particularly for rivers, transitional and coastal waters. (3) Wide ranges in nutrient threshold values within shared water body types, in some cases showing more than a 10-fold difference in concentrations. (4) Different approaches used to set threshold nutrient concentrations to define the boundary between "good" and "moderate" ecological status. Expert judgement-based methods resulted in significantly higher (less stringent) good-moderate threshold values compared with data-driven approaches, highlighting the importance of consistent and rigorous approaches to criteria setting. We suggest that further development of nutrient criteria should be based on relationships between ecological status and nutrient concentrations, taking into account the need for comparability between different water categories, water body types within these categories, and countries.

摘要

欧洲水政策的目标是到 2027 年实现所有河流、湖泊、沿海和过渡水域的良好生态状况。目前,超过一半的水体处于退化状态,营养物质富化是主要原因之一。因此,迫切需要建立可靠且可比较的营养物标准,使其与良好的生态状况相一致。本文重点介绍了欧盟成员国目前用于支持良好生态状况的广泛的营养物标准,并指出不适当的标准可能会阻碍良好状态的实现。除了对营养物标准进行全面概述外,我们还对设定这些标准的阈值浓度和方法进行了批判性分析。我们确定了四个关键问题:(1)不同国家对不同的水体类别使用不同的营养物(氮和/或磷);(2)不同的营养物分数(总、溶解无机)和统计汇总指标(例如,均值、百分位数、季节性、年度)的使用目前阻碍了各国之间的可比性,特别是对河流、过渡和沿海水域而言;(3)在共享水体类型内,营养物阈值值的范围很广,在某些情况下浓度差异超过 10 倍;(4)用于设定界定“良好”和“中等”生态状况的边界的阈值营养浓度的不同方法。基于专家判断的方法得出的良好-中等阈值值明显高于基于数据驱动的方法,这突出了对标准设定采用一致和严格方法的重要性。我们建议,营养物标准的进一步发展应基于生态状况与营养物浓度之间的关系,同时考虑到不同水体类别、这些类别内的水体类型以及各国之间的可比性需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e114/6878824/227fec349450/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验