Suppr超能文献

在初次二尖瓣主动脉瓣置换术中,开放半弓置换与钳夹升主动脉置换治疗主动脉病变的比较

Open hemiarch versus clamped ascending aorta replacement for aortopathy during initial bicuspid aortic valve replacement.

作者信息

Greason Kevin L, Crestanello Juan A, King Katherine S, Bagameri Gabor, Cicek Sertac M, Stulak John M, Daly Richard C, Dearani Joseph A, Schaff Hartzell V

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;161(1):12-20.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.09.028. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the extent of aortic resection necessary in patients with aortopathy related to bicuspid aortic valve disease. To address this issue, we reviewed our experience in patients undergoing ascending aorta replacement during bicuspid aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

We reviewed 702 patients who underwent ascending aorta replacement at the time of initial nonemergent native bicuspid aortic valve replacement at our institution between January 2000 and June 2017. Treatment cohorts included an open hemiarch replacement group (n = 225; 32%) and a clamped ascending aorta replacement group (n = 477; 68%).

RESULTS

Median patient age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51-67 years), female sex was present in 113 patients (16%), ejection fraction was 62% (IQR, 56%-66%), and aortic arch diameter was 33 mm (IQR, 29-36 mm). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the hemiarch replacement group (188 minutes vs 97 minutes; P < .001). Procedure-related complications (36%) and mortality (<1%) were similar in the 2 groups; however, the hemiarch group had an increased odds of blood transfusion (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.28; P = .006). The median duration of follow-up was 6.0 years (95% CI, 5.3-6.8 years). Overall survival was 94 ± 1% at 5 years and 80 ± 2% at 10 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated similar survival in the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.33; P = .439). No repeat aortic arch operations were done for aortopathy over the duration of clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients in the clamped ascending aorta replacement group, patients in the hemi-arch replacement group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times, along with an increased risk of blood transfusion, but similar freedom from repeat aortic arch operation and survival. We identified no advantage of performing hemiarch replacement in the absence of aortic arch dilation.

摘要

背景

对于与二叶式主动脉瓣疾病相关的主动脉病变患者,主动脉切除的必要范围存在争议。为解决这一问题,我们回顾了在二叶式主动脉瓣置换期间接受升主动脉置换患者的经验。

方法

我们回顾了2000年1月至2017年6月在我院初次进行非急诊自体二叶式主动脉瓣置换时接受升主动脉置换的702例患者。治疗队列包括开放性半弓置换组(n = 225;32%)和升主动脉钳闭置换组(n = 477;68%)。

结果

患者中位年龄为60岁(四分位间距[IQR],51 - 67岁),113例患者(16%)为女性,射血分数为62%(IQR,56% - 66%),主动脉弓直径为33 mm(IQR,29 - 36 mm)。半弓置换组的体外循环时间更长(188分钟对97分钟;P <.001)。两组的手术相关并发症(36%)和死亡率(<1%)相似;然而,半弓组输血几率增加(比值比,1.62;95%置信区间[CI],1.15 - 2.28;P =.006)。中位随访时间为6.0年(95% CI,5.3 - 6.8年)。5年总生存率为94 ± 1%,10年为80 ± 2%。多变量分析显示两组生存率相似(风险比,0.83;95% CI,0.51 - 1.33;P =.439)。在临床随访期间,未因主动脉病变进行再次主动脉弓手术。

结论

与升主动脉钳闭置换组患者相比,半弓置换组患者的体外循环和主动脉阻断时间更长,输血风险增加,但再次主动脉弓手术的自由度和生存率相似。在无主动脉弓扩张时,我们未发现进行半弓置换的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验