Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Heart. 2020 Jun;106(11):838-844. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315453. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
To compare effectiveness of warfarin and antiplatelet exposure regarding both thrombotic and bleeding events, following surgical aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis(bioSAVR).
The study included all patients in Sweden undergoing a bioSAVR during 2008-2014 who were alive at discharge from the index hospital stay. Exposure was analysed and defined as postdischarge dispension of any antithrombotic pharmaceutical, updated at each following dispensions and categorised as single antiplatelet (SAPT), warfarin, warfarin combined with SAPT, dual antiplatelet (DAPT) or no antithrombotic treatment. Exposure to SAPT was used as comparator. Outcome events were all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, any thromboembolism and major bleedings. We continuously updated adjustments for comorbidities with any indication for antithrombotic treatment by Cox regression analysis.
We identified 9539 patients with bioSAVR (36.8% women) at median age of 73 years with a mean follow-up of 3.13 years. As compared with SAPT, warfarin alone was associated with a lower incidence of ischaemic stroke (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.70) and any thromboembolism (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94) but with no difference in mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13). The incidence of haemorrhagic stroke (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.51) and major bleeding (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.15) was higher during warfarin exposure. As compared with SAPT, DAPT was not associated with any difference in ischaemic stroke or any thromboembolism. Risk-benefit analyses demonstrated that 2.7 (95% CI 1.0 to 11.9) of the ischaemic stroke cases could potentially be avoided per every haemorrhagic stroke caused by warfarin exposure instead of SAPT during the first year.
In patients discharged after bioSAVR, warfarin exposure as compared with SAPT exposure was associated with lower long-term risk of ischaemic stroke and thromboembolic events, and with a higher incidence of bleeding events but with similar mortality.
比较生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术后(bioSAVR)华法林和抗血小板药物暴露在血栓和出血事件方面的疗效。
本研究纳入了 2008 年至 2014 年间在瑞典接受 bioSAVR 且出院时存活的所有患者。分析暴露情况,并定义为出院后任何抗血栓药物的处方,每次处方更新时进行分类,分为单抗血小板治疗(SAPT)、华法林、华法林联合 SAPT、双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)或无抗血栓治疗。以 SAPT 暴露为对照。主要终点为全因死亡率、缺血性卒、出血性卒、任何血栓栓塞事件和大出血事件。我们通过 Cox 回归分析连续更新伴有抗血栓治疗指征的合并症调整。
共纳入 9539 例接受 bioSAVR 的患者(36.8%为女性),中位年龄为 73 岁,平均随访 3.13 年。与 SAPT 相比,华法林单药治疗可降低缺血性卒(HR 0.49,95%CI 0.35 至 0.70)和任何血栓栓塞事件(HR 0.75,95%CI 0.60 至 0.94)的发生率,但不增加死亡率(HR 0.94,95%CI 0.78 至 1.13)。华法林暴露组出血性卒(HR 1.94,95%CI 1.07 至 3.51)和大出血(HR 1.67,95%CI 1.30 至 2.15)的发生率较高。与 SAPT 相比,DAPT 治疗与缺血性卒或任何血栓栓塞事件均无差异。风险效益分析显示,第一年每发生 1 例因华法林暴露引起的大出血事件,就可能避免 2.7 例(95%CI 1.0 至 11.9)缺血性卒事件。
在接受 bioSAVR 治疗后出院的患者中,与 SAPT 相比,华法林暴露与较低的长期缺血性卒和血栓栓塞事件风险相关,出血事件发生率较高,但死亡率相似。