Vazquez Fernando J, Gonzalez Joaquín P, LeGal Gregoire, Carrier Marc, Gándara Esteban
Internal Medicine Research Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hospital Universitario, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.
Thromb Res. 2016 Feb;138:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Prior meta-analysis and observational studies have suggested that the bleeding risks associated with anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or aspirin (ASA) are similar.
The aim of this systematic review was to provide the odds ratios (ORs) of major bleeding, intracranial bleeding or major extra-cranial bleeding of anticoagulation with VKA compared to low doses of ASA.
We conducted a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (RCT). Randomized controlled trials reporting bleeding rates in adult patients randomized to a VKA (INR 2-3) or to ASA alone (<325mg daily). Random effects OR were calculated.
Fifteen trials reporting the outcome of 2511 participants treated with VKA alone and 2471 treated with ASA alone were included; most common conditions evaluated were non-valvular atrial fibrillation (five trials) and heart failure (three trials). Overall, the use of VKA was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.33-2.33) when compared to ASA. The OR associated with VKA use for intracranial bleeding and extra-cranial bleeding were 1.74 (95% CI 0.83-3.62) and 1.66 (95% CI 0.94-2.92), respectively. In trials achieving good control of anticoagulation [time in therapeutic range (TTR) >65%], the risk of bleeding with VKA was similar to that of ASA [OR 1.16 (95% CI 0.79-1.71)].
Contrary to prior reports our results suggest that the risk of major bleeding with the use VKA is higher compared to those of patients treated with ASA alone. However, in patients achieving a good TTR, the risk of major bleeding with VKA or ASA is similar.
先前的荟萃分析和观察性研究表明,使用维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)或阿司匹林(ASA)进行抗凝治疗的出血风险相似。
本系统评价的目的是提供VKA抗凝与低剂量ASA相比,主要出血、颅内出血或主要颅外出血的比值比(OR)。
我们对Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(RCT)进行了系统评价。随机对照试验报告了随机接受VKA(国际标准化比值[INR]2 - 3)或单独接受ASA(每日<325mg)治疗的成年患者的出血率。计算随机效应OR。
纳入了15项试验,报告了2511例单独接受VKA治疗和2471例单独接受ASA治疗的参与者的结果;评估的最常见疾病是非瓣膜性心房颤动(5项试验)和心力衰竭(3项试验)。总体而言,与ASA相比,使用VKA会增加主要出血风险(OR 1.76[95%置信区间1.33 - 2.33])。与VKA使用相关的颅内出血和颅外出血的OR分别为1.74(95%置信区间0.83 - 3.62)和1.66(95%置信区间0.94 - 2.92)。在抗凝控制良好的试验中[治疗范围内时间(TTR)>65%],VKA的出血风险与ASA相似[OR 1.16(95%置信区间0.79 - 1.71)]。
与先前报告相反,我们的结果表明,与单独接受ASA治疗患者相比,使用VKA的主要出血风险更高。然而,在TTR良好的患者中,VKA或ASA的主要出血风险相似。