Suppr超能文献

巴龙霉素优于甲硝唑治疗脆弱双核阿米巴。

Paromomycin is superior to metronidazole in Dientamoeba fragilis treatment.

机构信息

Atenció Primària, Fundació Assistencial Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain.

Departament Fonaments Clínics, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2019 Dec;11:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

Abstract

Dientamoeba fragilis is a trichomonad parasite of the human intestine that is found worldwide. However, the biological cycle and transmission of this parasite have yet to be elucidated. Although its pathogenic capacity has been questioned, there is increasing evidence that clinical manifestations vary greatly. Different therapeutic options with antiparasitic drugs are currently available; however, very few studies have compared the effectiveness of these drugs. In the present longitudinal study, we evaluate 13,983 copro-parasitological studies using light microscopy of stools, during 2013-2015, in Terrassa, Barcelona (Spain). A total of 1150 (8.2%) presented D. fragilis. Of these, 739 episodes were finally analyzed: those that involved a follow-up parasitology test up to 3 months later, corresponding to 586 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (53% under 15 years of age). Coinfection by Blastocystis hominis was present in 33.6% of the subjects. Our aim was to compare therapeutic responses to different antiparasitic drugs and the factors associated with the persistence of D. fragilis post-treatment. Gender, age, and other intestinal parasitic coinfections were not associated with parasite persistence following treatment. Metronidazole was the therapeutic option in most cases, followed by paromomycin: 65.4% and 17.5% respectively. Paromomycin was found to be more effective at eradicating parasitic infection than metronidazole (81.8% vs. 65.4%; p = 0.007), except in children under six years of age (p = 0.538). Although Dientamoeba fragilis mainly produces mild clinical manifestations, the high burden of infection means we require better understanding of its epidemiological cycle and pathogenicity, as well as adequate therapeutic guidelines in order to adapt medical care and policies to respond to this health problem.

摘要

脆弱双核阿米巴是一种存在于全世界人类肠道内的纤毛原虫寄生虫。然而,其生物学循环和传播途径尚未阐明。尽管其致病性一直存在争议,但越来越多的证据表明其临床表现差异很大。目前有多种抗寄生虫药物可供选择,但很少有研究比较这些药物的疗效。在本纵向研究中,我们评估了 2013 年至 2015 年期间在巴塞罗那(西班牙)泰拉萨使用粪便直接镜检法进行的 13983 项粪便寄生虫学研究。共有 1150 项(8.2%)检测到脆弱双核阿米巴。其中,739 例最终进行了分析:这些患者进行了寄生虫学随访检测,时间最长可达 3 个月,涉及 586 例有胃肠道症状的患者(53%年龄在 15 岁以下)。有 33.6%的患者合并感染人芽囊原虫。我们的目的是比较不同抗寄生虫药物的治疗效果以及与治疗后脆弱双核阿米巴持续存在相关的因素。性别、年龄和其他肠道寄生虫合并感染与治疗后寄生虫持续存在无关。大多数情况下选择甲硝唑进行治疗,其次是巴龙霉素:分别为 65.4%和 17.5%。巴龙霉素比甲硝唑更能有效消除寄生虫感染(81.8%比 65.4%;p=0.007),但 6 岁以下儿童除外(p=0.538)。尽管脆弱双核阿米巴主要引起轻微的临床表现,但由于其感染负担较高,我们需要更好地了解其流行病学循环和致病性,并制定适当的治疗指南,以适应医疗保健和政策,从而应对这一健康问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验