• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020 年国际脊柱侧凸研究学会临床科学奖:腰椎研究中评分变化的可靠性和可解释性。

ISSLS prize in clinical science 2020: the reliability and interpretability of score change in lumbar spine research.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Spine Center Göteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2020 Apr;29(4):663-669. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06222-8. Epub 2019 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-019-06222-8
PMID:31760488
Abstract

PURPOSE

A statistically significant score change of a PROM (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure) can be questioned if it does not exceed the clinically Minimal Important Change (MIC) or the SDC (Smallest Detectable Change) of the particular measure. The aim of the study was to define the SDC of three common PROMs in degenerative lumbar spine surgery: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Euroqol-5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) and to compare them to their MICs. The transition questions Global Assessment (GA) were also explored.

METHODS

Reliability analyses were performed on a test-retest population of 182 symptomatically stable patients, with similar characteristics as the Swespine registry population, who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar spine conditions 2017-2018. The MIC values were based on the entire registry (n = 98,732) using the ROC curve method. The ICC for absolute agreement was calculated in a two-way random-effects single measures model. For categorical variables, weighted kappa and exact agreement were computed.

RESULTS

For the NRS, the SDC exceeded the MIC (NRS:3.6 and 2.7; NRS: 3.7 and 3.2, respectively), while they were of an equal size of 18 for the ODI. The gap between the two estimates was remarkable in the EQ-5D, where SDC was 0.49 and MIC was 0.10. The GA showed an excellent agreement between the test and the retest occasion.

CONCLUSION

For the tested PROM scores, the changes must be considerable in order to distinguish a true change from random error in degenerative lumbar spine surgery research. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

摘要

目的

如果患者报告结局测量(PROM)的评分变化没有超过特定测量的临床最小重要变化(MIC)或可检测变化(SDC),则可以对其提出质疑。本研究的目的是定义三种常见退行性腰椎手术 PROM 的 SDC:数字评定量表(NRS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D),并将其与 MIC 进行比较。还探讨了过渡问题全球评估(GA)。

方法

在 2017-2018 年接受退行性腰椎疾病手术的症状稳定患者的测试-再测试人群(182 例,具有与 Swespine 登记人群相似的特征)中进行了可靠性分析。MIC 值基于整个登记处(n=98,732)使用 ROC 曲线方法。使用双向随机效应单测量模型计算绝对一致性的 ICC。对于分类变量,计算加权 Kappa 和精确一致性。

结果

对于 NRS,SDC 超过 MIC(NRS:3.6 和 2.7;NRS:3.7 和 3.2),而 ODI 的 SDC 和 MIC 相同,均为 18。在 EQ-5D 中,两者之间的差距非常显著,SDC 为 0.49,MIC 为 0.10。GA 在测试和再测试之间显示出极好的一致性。

结论

对于所测试的 PROM 评分,变化必须相当大,以便在退行性腰椎手术研究中从随机误差中区分真实变化。这些幻灯片可以在电子补充材料中检索到。

相似文献

1
ISSLS prize in clinical science 2020: the reliability and interpretability of score change in lumbar spine research.2020 年国际脊柱侧凸研究学会临床科学奖:腰椎研究中评分变化的可靠性和可解释性。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Apr;29(4):663-669. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06222-8. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
2
Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.退行性腰椎脊柱手术的随访-PROMs 在 1 年后趋于稳定:基于 Swespine 数据的等效性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2187-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.随访评分、变化评分或百分比变化评分用于确定手术后的临床重要结局?一项来自挪威脊柱外科登记处的观察性研究,评估了腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎退行性滑脱患者报告的结局测量指标。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2386-y.
4
Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.定义 I 级退变性腰椎滑脱的最小临床重要差异:来自质量结果数据库的见解。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17554.
5
Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.腰椎间盘突出症手术后失败和病情恶化的标准:一项基于挪威脊柱外科注册中心数据的多中心观察性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Oct;26(10):2650-2659. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5185-5. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective national spine registry observational study.腰椎管狭窄症手术后失败和恶化的标准:一项前瞻性全国脊柱登记观察性研究。
Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1489-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
7
Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射治疗抑郁与非抑郁患者退行性脊柱疾病后的患者报告结局。
Spine J. 2017 Apr;17(4):511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.女性在退行性腰椎滑脱症手术后恢复最佳:利用质量结果数据库的数据对最满意和最不满意的患者进行比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17553.
9
Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.在登记工作中准确测量腰椎手术的质量和效果:确定最有效且反应灵敏的工具。
Spine J. 2014 Dec 1;14(12):2885-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.023. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
10
An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.来自质量结果数据库的分析,第1部分。腰椎手术后的残疾、生活质量和疼痛结果:为共同决策预测可能的个体患者结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):357-369. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16526. Epub 2017 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
How reliable are the Core Outcome Measures Index and Global Treatment Outcome as measures of treatment success after surgery for central lumbar spinal canal stenosis?作为腰椎中央管狭窄症手术后治疗成功的衡量指标,核心结局指标指数和总体治疗结局的可靠性如何?
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08894-x.
2
Can 3-month models or observed 3- or 6-month patient-reported outcome measures accurately predict 12-month disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery?3个月的模型或观察到的3个月或6个月患者报告的结局指标能否准确预测腰椎减压术后12个月的残疾和疼痛情况?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 24;145(1):260. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05877-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery-PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data.退行性腰椎脊柱手术的随访-PROMs 在 1 年后趋于稳定:基于 Swespine 数据的等效性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2187-2197. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05989-0. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Measurement Properties of Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Pain Severity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.用于评估腰痛患者疼痛程度的视觉模拟评分法、数字评分法和简明疼痛量表疼痛严重程度子量表的测量特性:系统评价。
J Pain. 2019 Mar;20(3):245-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
3
A systematic review of minimum important changes for generic multi-attribute utility instruments and recommendations for their estimation.
通用多属性效用工具最小重要变化的系统评价及其估计建议。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01778-3.
4
The strategic use of Big Data - A study protocol for a multicenter clinical trial testing if the use of the Swespine Dialogue Support alter outcomes in degenerative spine surgery.大数据的战略性应用 - 一项多中心临床试验研究方案,旨在测试 Swespine 对话支持的使用是否会改变退行性脊柱手术的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 21;25(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07714-5.
5
Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation of surgically treated patients from the NORDSTEN study.腰椎管狭窄症患者的 Oswestry 功能障碍指数和苏黎世间歇性跛行问卷的反应性:来自 NORDSTEN 研究的手术治疗患者的评估。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Nov;33(11):4270-4280. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08440-1. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
6
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy vs Standard Discectomy: A Noninferiority Study on Clinically Relevant Changes.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与标准椎间盘切除术:关于临床相关变化的非劣效性研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):364-369. doi: 10.14444/8458. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
7
Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.颈椎神经根病的手术治疗:前路颈椎减压融合术与后路椎间孔切开术的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05492-2.
8
Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4-5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.后路减压融合与非融合治疗伴或不伴退行性腰椎滑脱的 L4-5 腰椎管狭窄症的再次手术:Swespine 国家瑞典脊柱登记处的 6532 例患者研究。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Jun;92(3):264-268. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With Mild Leg Pain Levels Is Associated With Unsatisfactory Outcome.轻度腿痛患者的腰椎管狭窄症手术疗效欠佳。
Global Spine J. 2021 Oct;11(8):1202-1207. doi: 10.1177/2192568220942510. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Evidence on the measurement properties of health-related quality of life instruments is largely missing in patients with low back pain: A systematic review.
健康相关生活质量量表的测量学特性在腰痛患者中缺乏证据:系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:23-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
The value of patient global assessment in lumbar spine surgery: an evaluation based on more than 90,000 patients.患者整体评估在腰椎手术中的价值:基于9万多名患者的评估
Eur Spine J. 2018 Mar;27(3):554-563. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5331-0. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷和奥斯威斯残疾指数:在测量非特异性下腰痛的身体功能方面,哪一个具有更好的测量属性?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1620-1637. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150420. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
6
The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review.EQ-5D指数的最小临床重要差异:一项批判性综述。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Apr;14(2):221-33. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.894462.
7
Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report.Swespine:瑞典脊柱注册中心报告:2012 年度报告。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):953-74. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2758-9.
8
Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain.评估慢性下背痛治疗成功的常用结局指标。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S54-68. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef74d.
9
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods.最小有意义差异(MID)点:术语和方法批判。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Apr;11(2):171-84. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.9.
10
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.COSMIN 清单用于评估健康状况测量仪器测量性能研究的方法学质量:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.