• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后路减压融合与非融合治疗伴或不伴退行性腰椎滑脱的 L4-5 腰椎管狭窄症的再次手术:Swespine 国家瑞典脊柱登记处的 6532 例患者研究。

Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4-5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Örebro University School of Medical Sciences and Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2021 Jun;92(3):264-268. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505
PMID:33506701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8231344/
Abstract

Background and purpose - There are different opinions on how to surgically address lumbar spinal stenosis with concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). We investigated reoperation rates at the index and adjacent levels after L4-5 fusion surgery in a large cohort of unselected patients registered in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.Patients and methods - 6,532 patients, who underwent surgery for L4-5 spinal stenosis with or without DS between 2007 and 2012, were followed up to 2017 to identify reoperations at the index and adjacent levels. The reoperation rates for decompression and fusion were compared with the reoperation rates for decompression only and for patients with or without DS. Patient-reported outcome data were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery and used to evaluate differences in outcome between index operations and reoperations.Results - For spinal stenosis with DS, the reoperation rate at the index level was 3.0% for decompression and fusion and 6.0% for decompression only. At the adjacent level, the corresponding numbers were 9.7% and 4.2% respectively. For spinal stenosis without DS, the reoperation rate at the index level was 3.7% for decompression and fusion and 6.2% after decompression only. At the adjacent level, the corresponding numbers were 8.1% and 3.8% respectively. For the reoperations at the adjacent level, there was no difference in patient-reported outcome between extended fusion or decompression only.Interpretation - Single-level lumbar fusion surgery is associated with an increased rate of reoperations at the adjacent level compared with decompression only. When reoperations at the index level are included there is no difference in reoperation rates between fusion and decompression only.

摘要

背景与目的-对于合并退行性腰椎滑脱(DS)的腰椎管狭窄症如何进行手术治疗,存在不同意见。我们在瑞典全国脊柱登记处(Swespine)的一项未经选择的大样本患者队列中研究了 L4-5 融合术后指数和相邻节段的再手术率。

患者与方法-2007 年至 2012 年间,6532 例患者因 L4-5 椎管狭窄症合并或不合并 DS 接受手术治疗,随访至 2017 年,以确定指数和相邻节段的再手术情况。比较了减压融合与单纯减压以及合并或不合并 DS 的患者之间的再手术率。收集了患者术前、术后 1 年和 2 年的报告结果数据,用于评估指数手术和再手术之间结果的差异。

结果-对于合并 DS 的腰椎管狭窄症,减压融合的指数水平再手术率为 3.0%,单纯减压的再手术率为 6.0%。在相邻水平,相应的数字分别为 9.7%和 4.2%。对于不合并 DS 的腰椎管狭窄症,减压融合的指数水平再手术率为 3.7%,单纯减压的再手术率为 6.2%。在相邻水平,相应的数字分别为 8.1%和 3.8%。对于相邻水平的再手术,扩展融合与单纯减压之间的患者报告结果无差异。

结论-与单纯减压相比,单节段腰椎融合术与相邻节段再手术率增加相关。当包括指数水平的再手术时,融合与单纯减压的再手术率没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/24b93b7d0286/IORT_A_1879505_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/a107fc796b1b/IORT_A_1879505_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/267594bd5c6a/IORT_A_1879505_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/24b93b7d0286/IORT_A_1879505_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/a107fc796b1b/IORT_A_1879505_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/267594bd5c6a/IORT_A_1879505_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd65/8231344/24b93b7d0286/IORT_A_1879505_F0003_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4-5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.后路减压融合与非融合治疗伴或不伴退行性腰椎滑脱的 L4-5 腰椎管狭窄症的再次手术:Swespine 国家瑞典脊柱登记处的 6532 例患者研究。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Jun;92(3):264-268. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1879505. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Reoperations After Decompression With or Without Fusion for L3-4 Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Study of 372 Patients in Swespine, the National Swedish Spine Register.L3 - 4节段伴有退行性椎体滑脱的腰椎管狭窄症减压术(无论是否融合)后的再次手术:瑞典国家脊柱登记处Swespine中372例患者的研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Apr 1;35(3):E389-E393. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001255.
3
In Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Leads to Less Reoperations at 5 Years When Compared to Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion: A Propensity-matched Retrospective Analysis.在退行性脊椎滑脱症中,与后路减压融合内固定相比,单侧椎板切开术双侧减压可减少 5 年内的再次手术率:一项倾向匹配回顾性分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Nov 1;44(21):1530-1537. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003121.
4
Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.腰椎管狭窄症手术无脊椎滑脱的再手术率:一项全国性队列研究。
Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
5
Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.腰椎管狭窄症和I度腰椎滑脱症患者是否应根据脊柱骨盆对线情况进行不同治疗?一项为期两年的回顾性研究,对单一医疗系统内多个地点的患者报告结局指标和临床结局进行倾向匹配比较。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
7
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.与退变性腰椎滑脱相关的腰椎管狭窄症:开放减压与微创减压术后二次融合率的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 1;80(3):355-367. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw091.
8
Does fusion improve the outcome after decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis?: A two-year follow-up study involving 5390 patients.减压手术后融合是否能改善腰椎管狭窄症的预后?:一项涉及 5390 例患者的两年随访研究。
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):960-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.30776.
9
Clinical outcome of microendoscopic posterior decompression for spinal stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis--minimum 2-year outcome of 37 patients.显微镜下后路减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症合并腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效——37例患者至少2年的随访结果
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Oct;51(5):267-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082314. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
10
Additional operation rates after surgery for degenerative spine diseases: minimum 10 years follow-up of 4705 patients in the national Swedish spine register. 退变性脊柱疾病患者术后再次手术率:4705 例患者的国家瑞典脊柱登记处至少 10 年随访结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 9;12(12):e067571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067571.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Risk Factors for Postoperative Progressive Segment Degeneration at the Decompression and Non-decompression Segments after Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Surgery: A 5-year Follow-up Study.微创腰椎减压术后减压节段与非减压节段术后进行性节段退变的危险因素分析:一项5年随访研究
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Jun 24;9(1):22-29. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0014. eCollection 2025 Jan 27.
2
Spondylolisthesis and Scoliosis Progression and Associated Revision Rates Following Bilateral Lumbar Spine Microscopic Decompression.双侧腰椎显微镜下减压术后腰椎滑脱和脊柱侧弯的进展及相关翻修率
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Aug 22;9(1):30-35. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0137. eCollection 2025 Jan 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations.单纯减压术后是否需要行后续融合治疗腰椎退变性滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的必要性及相关危险因素:两个不同大样本的 5 年随访研究。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1566-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
ISSLS prize in clinical science 2020: the reliability and interpretability of score change in lumbar spine research.2020 年国际脊柱侧凸研究学会临床科学奖:腰椎研究中评分变化的可靠性和可解释性。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Apr;29(4):663-669. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06222-8. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
3
Decompression alone or fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis? A systematic review and meta analysis.
单纯减压与融合固定治疗退变性腰椎滑脱伴单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 10;25(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07641-5.
4
Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review.临床质量登记处和收集患者报告结局测量数据的数据库中的反应率:范围综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 11;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02155-5.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for reoperation after degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery.退行性腰椎滑脱症手术后再次手术的危险因素的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 5;23(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02082-8.
6
Short-Term Patient Outcomes Using the Interlaminar Endoscopic Surgical System Ilessys® Delta System versus Bilateral Laminotomy: A Single-Center Study of 80 Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.经椎间孔内窥镜下手术系统 Ilessys® Delta 系统与双侧椎板切开术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症 80 例患者的短期疗效观察:单中心研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 May 9;29:e938477. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938477.
7
[Lumbar spinal stenosis].[腰椎管狭窄症]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Nov;51(11):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04297-8. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
8
Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎滑脱症单纯减压或减压融合术
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jul 16;51:101559. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101559. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯减压与减压加融合治疗退变性腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(12):664. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2208.
Prognostic Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After L4-L5 Lumbar Fusion.
L4-L5 腰椎融合术后邻近节段疾病的预后因素。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):835-842. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz241.
4
Adjacent Segment Disease After Single Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimum 10 Years Follow-up.退变性腰椎滑脱症单节段后路腰椎间融合术后邻近节段病:至少 10 年随访。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Dec 1;43(23):E1384-E1388. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002710.
5
Randomized controlled trials for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: which patients benefit from lumbar fusion?退行性腰椎滑脱的随机对照试验:哪些患者能从腰椎融合术中获益?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):260-266. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16716. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.后路腰椎滑脱症的椎板切除术联合融合术与单纯椎板切除术的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
7
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
8
Incidence of Adjacent Segment Disease Requiring Reoperation After Lumbar Laminectomy Without Fusion: A Study of 398 Patients.腰椎椎板切除术后未行融合术需再次手术的相邻节段疾病发生率:398例患者的研究
Neurosurgery. 2016 Feb;78(2):192-9. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001007.
9
Symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration at the L3-4 level after fusion surgery at the L4-5 level: evaluation of the risk factors and 10-year incidence.L4-5节段融合手术后L3-4节段出现的症状性相邻节段退变:危险因素评估及10年发病率
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2474-80. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4188-3. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
10
Impact of body mass index on adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease.体重指数对退变性脊柱疾病腰椎融合术后相邻节段疾病的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2015 Apr;76(4):396-401; discussion 401-2; quiz 402. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000627.