Suppr超能文献

北美药学专业招生简史。

A brief history of pharmacy admissions in North America.

作者信息

Davis Erin, Braha Richard, McAlorum Shannon, Kelly Debbie

机构信息

School of Pharmacy (Davis, Kelly), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.

Health Sciences Library (McAlorum), Memorial University, St. John's, NL.

出版信息

Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019 Aug 5;152(6):370-375. doi: 10.1177/1715163519865571. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

The move from a Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy to a Doctor of Pharmacy degree, both in the United States and in Canada, has been accompanied by a general move towards increased prepharmacy admission requirements and longer pharmacy programs. Historically, the most thoroughly researched pharmacy admissions variables include grade point average (GPA), Pharmacy College Admissions Test (PCAT), interviews and critical thinking tests. Most programs now require a combination of academic (GPA ± PCAT) and nonacademic characteristics (e.g., interviews, volunteering, critical thinking tests, essays). This review focuses on GPA and the PCAT as academic admissions measures and the interview (both traditional and the multiple mini-interview) and critical thinking tests as nonacademic measures. There is evidence that prepharmacy GPA, the PCAT and admissions interviews are correlated with academic success in a pharmacy program. Repeating a prepharmacy course is a negative predictor of academic success. The multiple mini-interview and various critical thinking tests have been studied in pharmacy admissions, but the evidence to date does not support their use for predicting success. Several areas require further research, including finding an effective measure of reasoning and critical thinking skills. The relationship between admission test scores and clinical performance also requires further study, as academic achievement in pharmacy programs has been the main measure of success to date.

摘要

在美国和加拿大,从药学理学学士学位过渡到药学博士学位的过程中,伴随着药学预科入学要求普遍提高以及药学课程时长延长的趋势。从历史上看,研究最为深入的药学入学变量包括平均绩点(GPA)、药学院入学考试(PCAT)、面试和批判性思维测试。现在大多数项目都要求综合考虑学术因素(GPA ± PCAT)和非学术因素(如面试、志愿服务、批判性思维测试、短文)。本综述重点关注作为学术入学衡量标准的GPA和PCAT,以及作为非学术衡量标准的面试(包括传统面试和多重迷你面试)和批判性思维测试。有证据表明,药学预科GPA、PCAT和入学面试与药学项目中的学业成绩相关。重修药学预科课程是学业成功的负面预测因素。多重迷你面试和各种批判性思维测试已在药学入学中进行了研究,但迄今为止的证据并不支持将其用于预测成功。有几个领域需要进一步研究,包括找到一种有效的推理和批判性思维技能衡量方法。入学考试成绩与临床绩效之间的关系也需要进一步研究,因为迄今为止,药学项目中的学业成绩一直是成功的主要衡量标准。

相似文献

1
A brief history of pharmacy admissions in North America.北美药学专业招生简史。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019 Aug 5;152(6):370-375. doi: 10.1177/1715163519865571. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验