• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置受者洋地黄类药物的效用值得怀疑:一项多中心回顾性分析。

Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.

Cardiovascular Division, Electrophysiology Section, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225628. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0225628
PMID:31765397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6876793/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 505 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007-2015 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: not on digoxin at any time (ND; n = 257), received digoxin pre implant (PreD; n = 144), received digoxin pre and post implant (ContD; n = 55), and received digoxin only post implant (PostD; n = 49). Survival and all-cause readmission were compared between the 4 groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in survival at 1 year nor at 3 years between groups (ND = 88%, 66%, respectively; PreD = 85%, 66%; ContD = 86%, 57%; PostD = 90%, 51%; p = 0.7). Readmission per 100 days also was not different between groups (ND = 0.5, PreD = 0.6, ContD = 0.5, PostD = 0.7; p = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, multicenter cohort, use of digoxin was not associated with any significant benefit in regard to mortality or hospitalization in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. Importantly, its discontinuation post implant did not worsen all-cause hospitalization or survival.

摘要

背景

虽然左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的临床经验不断发展,但对于该人群中某些药物的持续使用知之甚少。我们旨在评估地高辛在 LVAD 受者中的应用价值及其与结局的相关性。

方法

共纳入 2007 年至 2015 年间 5 个中心接受连续血流 LVAD 植入的 505 例患者。患者分为 4 组:任何时候均未用地高辛(ND;n = 257)、植入前用地高辛(PreD;n = 144)、植入前后均用地高辛(ContD;n = 55)和仅植入后用地高辛(PostD;n = 49)。比较 4 组间的生存和全因再入院情况。

结果

各组间 1 年和 3 年生存率无差异(ND = 88%,66%;PreD = 85%,66%;ContD = 86%,57%;PostD = 90%,51%;p = 0.7)。每 100 天再入院率也无差异(ND = 0.5,PreD = 0.6,ContD = 0.5,PostD = 0.7;p = 0.1)。

结论

在这项大型多中心队列研究中,连续血流 LVAD 支持患者使用地高辛与死亡率或住院率无显著相关性。重要的是,植入后停用地高辛并未增加全因住院或死亡风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce57/6876793/04a9e59a26ab/pone.0225628.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce57/6876793/04a9e59a26ab/pone.0225628.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce57/6876793/04a9e59a26ab/pone.0225628.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.左心室辅助装置受者洋地黄类药物的效用值得怀疑:一项多中心回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225628. eCollection 2019.
2
Recovery of Serum Cholesterol Predicts Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.血清胆固醇的恢复可预测左心室辅助装置植入后的生存率。
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002881.
3
Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.糖尿病对左心室辅助装置植入术后患者结局的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Aug;106(2):555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.02.045. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
4
Impact of age on outcomes following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.年龄对连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):743-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv051. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
Limited Utility of Tricuspid Valve Repair at the Time of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入时三尖瓣修复的效用有限。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jun;101(6):2168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.040. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
6
Impact of Postoperative Liver Dysfunction on Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.术后肝功能障碍对左心室辅助装置植入术后生存的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov;104(5):1556-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.048. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
7
Significance of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后残余二尖瓣反流的意义。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Survival in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.植入式心脏除颤器与连续性左心室辅助装置患者的生存
ASAIO J. 2019 Jan;65(1):49-53. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000739.
9
Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.心脏再同步治疗对持续血流左心室辅助装置患者临床结局的影响。
J Card Fail. 2015 Mar;21(3):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Mid-term survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation.持续血流左心室辅助装置与心脏移植后的中期生存率
Heart Vessels. 2016 May;31(5):722-33. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0654-4. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Complications Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: An Emphasis on Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Stroke, and Pump Thrombosis.左心室辅助装置植入后的血栓形成和出血并发症:重点关注胃肠道出血、中风和泵血栓形成。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51160. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51160. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Digoxin Is Associated With a Decreased Incidence of Angiodysplasia-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.地高辛与连续性左心室辅助装置患者的血管发育不良相关胃肠道出血发生率降低相关。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;11(8):e004899. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004899.
2
Impact of 30 Day Readmission After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后 30 天再入院的影响。
ASAIO J. 2019 Mar/Apr;65(3):252-256. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000812.
3
Longitudinal Heart Failure Medication Use and Adherence Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Privately Insured Patients.
私营保险患者左心室辅助装置植入后的心力衰竭药物使用和依从性的纵向研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 3;6(10):e005776. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005776.
4
Angiotensin II antagonism is associated with reduced risk for gastrointestinal bleeding caused by arteriovenous malformations in patients with left ventricular assist devices.血管紧张素 II 拮抗剂与左心室辅助装置患者动静脉畸形引起的胃肠道出血风险降低相关。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Apr;36(4):380-385. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
5
Variability in Retail Pricing of Generic Drugs for Heart Failure.心力衰竭通用药物零售价格的可变性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):126-128. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6955.
6
Use of digoxin and risk of death or readmission for heart failure and sinus rhythm: A nationwide propensity score matched study.地高辛的使用与心力衰竭和窦性心律患者的死亡或再入院风险:一项全国性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:944-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.111. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
Hospital Readmissions After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Causes, and Cost Analysis.连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后的医院再入院情况:发生率、原因及成本分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Sep;100(3):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
8
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组关于心力衰竭管理的指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
9
Trends in the medical management of patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者的医学管理趋势。
J Clin Med Res. 2013 Jun;5(3):194-204. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1376w. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
The 2013 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: executive summary.2013年国际心肺移植学会机械循环支持指南:执行摘要
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Feb;32(2):157-87. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.09.013.