Department of Basic Psychological Processes and their Development, University of The Basque Country, 70 Tolosa Av., 20018 San Sebastian, Spain.
Physiol Behav. 2020 Feb 1;214:112747. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112747. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
The aims of this study were to identify behavioral strategies to cope with social defeat, evaluate their impact on tumor development and analyze the contributions of both to changes in physiology and behavior produced by chronic defeat stress. For this purpose, OF1 mice were inoculated with B16F10 melanoma cells and subjected to 18 days of repeated defeat stress in the presence of a resident selected for consistent levels of aggression. Combined cluster and discriminant analyses of behavior that manifested during the first social interaction identified three types of behavioral profiles: active/aggressive (AA), passive/reactive (PR) and an intermediate active/non-aggressive (ANA) profile. Animals that showed a PR coping strategy developed more pulmonary metastases at the end of the social stress period than animals in other groups. The ANA but not AA group also showed higher tumor metastases than non-stressed subjects. In addition, the ANA group differed from the other groups because it displayed the highest corticosterone levels after the first interaction. Chronic stress reduced sucrose consumption, which indicates anhedonia, in all the stressed groups. However, the PR subjects exhibited a longer immobility time and swam for less time than other subjects in the forced swim test (FST), and they travelled a shorter distance in the open field test (OFT). In this test, the ANA group also travelled smaller distances than the non-stressed group, but the difference was more moderate. In contrast, tumor development but not stress increased behaviors associated with anxiety in the OFT (e.g., time in the center) in all tumor-bearing subjects. In summary, although the effects of social stress and tumor development on behavior were rather moderate, the results indicate the importance of behavioral coping strategies in modulating the effects of chronic stress on health.
本研究旨在确定应对社交挫败的行为策略,评估其对肿瘤发展的影响,并分析两者对慢性挫败应激引起的生理和行为变化的贡献。为此,将 OF1 小鼠接种 B16F10 黑色素瘤细胞,并在攻击性一致的常驻鼠存在的情况下进行 18 天的反复社交挫败。对首次社交互动中表现出的行为进行聚类和判别分析,确定了三种行为特征类型:积极/攻击型(AA)、消极/反应型(PR)和中间积极/非攻击型(ANA)。表现出 PR 应对策略的动物在社交应激期结束时肺部转移瘤的发展比其他组的动物更多。ANA 组而非 AA 组的肿瘤转移也高于非应激组。此外,ANA 组与其他组不同,因为它在第一次互动后表现出最高的皮质酮水平。慢性应激降低了所有应激组的蔗糖消耗,表明快感缺失。然而,PR 组在强迫游泳试验(FST)中的不动时间较长,游泳时间较短,在旷场试验(OFT)中的行进距离较短。在这项测试中,ANA 组的行进距离也比非应激组小,但差异更适中。相比之下,只有肿瘤生长而不是应激增加了 OFT 中与焦虑相关的行为(例如,中心停留时间),所有荷瘤动物都表现出这种行为。总之,尽管社交应激和肿瘤发展对行为的影响相当温和,但结果表明行为应对策略在调节慢性应激对健康的影响方面的重要性。