Department of Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine, Växjö Central Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.
Department of Medical Biosciences, Clinical Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020 Feb;80(1):39-45. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1692233. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
Currently used methodologies for quality control of residual leukocytes and erythrocytes in leukocyte-depleted plasma are either expensive or time-consuming. It has been proposed that urine dipsticks could be used as a screening method for residual erythrocytes. The aim was, therefore, to evaluate if urine dipsticks could be used to detect residual erythrocytes and also residual leukocytes in leukocyte-depleted plasma. Dilution series ranging over the decision limits for residual erythrocytes and leukocytes were prepared. Positive, negative and overall agreements, as well as the precision and joint frequency distributions, were calculated for five dipstick analyzers and their corresponding dipsticks. Twenty-four consecutive leukocyte-depleted donor plasma samples were also tested. None of the dipstick analyzers had both a high positive and a high negative agreement. Accordingly, none of the analyzers were able to discriminate between cell concentrations close to the decision limits. The inconsistency count revealed differences in precision between the dipstick analyzers. In the 24 consecutive donor samples, no significant correlation between the dipstick analyzers and the reference methods were found. In conclusion, urine dipsticks are not suitable for quality control of residual leukocytes and erythrocytes in leukocyte-depleted donor plasma.
目前用于白细胞去除血浆中残留白细胞和红细胞质量控制的方法要么昂贵,要么耗时。有人提出尿试纸可以作为残留红细胞的筛选方法。因此,本研究旨在评估尿试纸是否可用于检测白细胞去除血浆中的残留红细胞和白细胞。制备了残留红细胞和白细胞的检测限范围内的稀释系列。计算了五个尿试纸分析仪及其相应尿试纸的阳性、阴性和总符合率,以及精密度和联合频率分布。还测试了 24 份连续的白细胞去除供体血浆样本。没有一个尿试纸分析仪具有高阳性和高阴性符合率。因此,没有一个分析仪能够区分接近检测限的细胞浓度。不一致计数显示尿试纸分析仪之间的精密度存在差异。在 24 份连续的供体样本中,未发现尿试纸分析仪与参考方法之间存在显著相关性。总之,尿试纸不适用于白细胞去除供体血浆中残留白细胞和红细胞的质量控制。