Neuroscience Department, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481.
Neuroscience Department, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481
eNeuro. 2020 Jan 3;7(1). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0055-19.2019. Print 2020 Jan/Feb.
To characterize the rat as a potential model of frontal-parietal auditory processing during sustained attention, target detection, and response inhibition, we recorded field potentials (FPs) at multiple sites in medial-dorsal frontal and posterior parietal cortex simultaneously while rats performed an equiprobable auditory go/no-go discrimination task. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were calculated by averaging tone-triggered FPs across hit, miss, false alarm (FA), and correct rejection (CR) trials separately for each recording session, and five peak amplitudes (termed N1, P2, N2, P3E, and P3L) were extracted from the individual-session ERPs. Comparing peak amplitudes across different trials types indicated a statistically significant amplification of the P2 peak on hit trials that accompanies detection of the target tone prior to the behavioral go response. This result appears analogous to human ERP phenomena during auditory target discrimination. Conversely, the rat P3 responses were not associated with target detection as in the human ERP literature. Likewise, we did not observe the "no-go N2" or "no-go P3" responses reported in the human literature in association with response inhibition, which might reflect differences in task context or a difference in auditory processing between rats and humans. We also present analyses of stimulus-induced spectral power and interarea coherence to characterize oscillatory synchronization which may contribute to ERPs, and discuss possible error-related processing at the N2, P3E, and P3L peaks.
为了描述大鼠作为持续性注意、目标检测和反应抑制期间额顶叶听觉处理的潜在模型,我们在大鼠执行等概率听觉 Go/No-Go 辨别任务时,同时在中背侧额皮质和后顶叶皮质的多个部位记录了场电位 (FPs)。通过对每个记录会话中的 hit、miss、false alarm (FA) 和 correct rejection (CR) 试验分别对触发音调的 FPs 进行平均,计算了事件相关电位 (ERPs),并从单个会话 ERPs 中提取了五个峰值幅度 (分别称为 N1、P2、N2、P3E 和 P3L)。比较不同试验类型的峰值幅度表明,在行为 Go 反应之前检测到目标音调时,P2 峰值显著增强。这一结果似乎类似于人类听觉目标辨别期间的 ERP 现象。相反,大鼠的 P3 反应与目标检测无关,这与人类 ERP 文献中的报道不同。同样,我们也没有观察到与反应抑制相关的人类文献中报道的“无 Go N2”或“无 Go P3”反应,这可能反映了任务背景的差异或大鼠和人类之间听觉处理的差异。我们还介绍了刺激诱导的频谱功率和区域间相干性分析,以描述可能对 ERPs 有贡献的振荡同步,并讨论了 N2、P3E 和 P3L 峰值处可能存在的错误相关处理。