• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青春期前儿童体感和听觉 Go/No-go 范式中 ERP 成分的方式差异。

Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Human Life and Environment, Nara Women's University, Nara, Japan.

The Elementary School Attached to Nara Women's University, Nara, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259653. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0259653
PMID:34748591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8575285/
Abstract

We investigated modality differences in the N2 and P3 components of event-related potentials (ERPs) between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in eighteen healthy prepubescent children (mean age: 125.9±4.2 months). We also evaluated the relationship between behavioral responses (reaction time, reaction time variability, and omission and commission error rates) and amplitudes and latencies of N2 and P3 during somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms. The peak latency of No-go-N2 was significantly shorter than that of Go-N2 during somatosensory paradigms, but not during auditory paradigms. The peak amplitude of P3 was significantly larger during somatosensory than auditory paradigms, and the peak latency of P3 was significantly shorter during somatosensory than auditory paradigms. Correlations between behavioral responses and the P3 component were not found during somatosensory paradigms. On the other hand, in auditory paradigms, correlations were detected between the reaction time and peak amplitude of No-go-P3, and between the reaction time variability and peak latency of No-go-P3. A correlation was noted between commission error and the peak latency of No-go-N2 during somatosensory paradigms. Compared with previous adult studies using both somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms, the relationships between behavioral responses and ERP components would be weak in prepubescent children. Our data provide findings to advance understanding of the neural development of motor execution and inhibition processing, that is dependent on or independent of the stimulus modality.

摘要

我们研究了 18 名健康青春期前儿童(平均年龄:125.9±4.2 个月)在体感和听觉 Go/No-go 范式中事件相关电位(ERPs)的 N2 和 P3 成分的模态差异。我们还评估了行为反应(反应时间、反应时间变异性以及遗漏和错误率)与体感和听觉 Go/No-go 范式中 N2 和 P3 的振幅和潜伏期之间的关系。体感范式中 No-go-N2 的峰值潜伏期明显短于 Go-N2,但听觉范式中则不然。体感范式中 P3 的峰值振幅明显大于听觉范式,而 P3 的峰值潜伏期明显短于听觉范式。体感范式中,行为反应与 P3 成分之间没有相关性。另一方面,在听觉范式中,发现了 No-go-P3 的反应时间和峰值振幅以及 No-go-P3 的反应时间变异性和峰值潜伏期之间的相关性。体感范式中,发现了错误率和 No-go-N2 的峰值潜伏期之间的相关性。与之前使用体感和听觉 Go/No-go 范式的成人研究相比,青春期前儿童的行为反应与 ERP 成分之间的关系较弱。我们的数据为推进对运动执行和抑制处理的神经发育的理解提供了依据,这些理解取决于或独立于刺激模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520e/8575285/77196ba30fa6/pone.0259653.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520e/8575285/d549f804ff98/pone.0259653.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520e/8575285/77196ba30fa6/pone.0259653.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520e/8575285/d549f804ff98/pone.0259653.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/520e/8575285/77196ba30fa6/pone.0259653.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Modality differences in ERP components between somatosensory and auditory Go/No-go paradigms in prepubescent children.青春期前儿童体感和听觉 Go/No-go 范式中 ERP 成分的方式差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259653. eCollection 2021.
2
Effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise on human somatosensory cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials.刺激强度和听觉白噪声对人体体感认知加工的影响:一项使用事件相关电位的研究
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5443-8. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
3
Evaluation of auditory, visual and olfactory event-related potentials for comparing interspersed- and single-stimulus paradigms.评估听觉、视觉和嗅觉事件相关电位,比较间隔刺激和单刺激范式。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Sep;81(3):252-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.020. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
4
Effects of white noise on event-related potentials in somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.白噪声对体感Go/No-go范式中事件相关电位的影响。
Neuroreport. 2017 Sep 6;28(13):788-792. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000821.
5
Effects of acute hypoxia on human cognitive processing: a study using ERPs and SEPs.急性缺氧对人类认知加工的影响:一项使用 ERP 和 SEP 的研究。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Nov 1;123(5):1246-1255. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age.人类听觉和体感事件相关电位:反应条件和年龄的影响。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Apr;66(4):409-19. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90210-0.
7
Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.等概率听觉Go/NoGo任务中的性别差异:对N2和P3的影响
Exp Brain Res. 2017 May;235(5):1565-1574. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4911-x. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
8
Auditory and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in early blind humans.早期失明者的听觉和体感事件相关脑电位
Exp Brain Res. 1995;104(3):519-26. doi: 10.1007/BF00231986.
9
The relationship between cognitive style and event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.听觉和体感Go/No-go范式中认知风格与事件相关电位的关系。
Neuroreport. 2017 Sep 6;28(13):822-827. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000833.
10
The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.7至12岁儿童停止信号及Go/Nogo反应抑制的发展:表现与事件相关电位指标
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Jan;63(1):25-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Impaired emotional response inhibition among adolescents with bipolar depression: evidence from event-related potentials and behavioral performance.双相抑郁症青少年的情绪反应抑制受损:来自事件相关电位和行为表现的证据。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06748-w.
2
Go/No-Go Ratios Modulate Inhibition-Related Brain Activity: An Event-Related Potential Study.“去/不去”比率调节与抑制相关的脑活动:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 24;14(5):414. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050414.
3
Fast and Stable Responses during Decision Making Require Strong Inhibitory Processes in Soccer Players.

本文引用的文献

1
Modality-specific improvements in sensory processing among baseball players.棒球运动员感觉加工的特异性改善。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):2248. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81852-x.
2
Differences in characteristics of somatosensory evoked potentials between children and adults.儿童与成人躯体感觉诱发电位特征的差异。
Neuroreport. 2019 Dec 18;30(18):1284-1288. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001355.
3
Effects of repetitive exercise and thermal stress on human cognitive processing.重复运动和热应激对人类认知加工的影响。
足球运动员在决策过程中快速稳定的反应需要强大的抑制过程。
Brain Sci. 2024 Feb 22;14(3):199. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030199.
Physiol Rep. 2019 Feb;7(4):e14003. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14003.
4
Effects of stimulus intensity and auditory white noise on human somatosensory cognitive processing: a study using event-related potentials.刺激强度和听觉白噪声对人体体感认知加工的影响:一项使用事件相关电位的研究
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5443-8. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
5
A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.听觉等概率 Go/NoGo 任务中儿童的加工模式:ERP 成分与行为。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Jan;123:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Effects of acute hypoxia on human cognitive processing: a study using ERPs and SEPs.急性缺氧对人类认知加工的影响:一项使用 ERP 和 SEP 的研究。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Nov 1;123(5):1246-1255. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00348.2017. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
The relationship between cognitive style and event-related potentials during auditory and somatosensory Go/No-go paradigms.听觉和体感Go/No-go范式中认知风格与事件相关电位的关系。
Neuroreport. 2017 Sep 6;28(13):822-827. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000833.
8
Suppression of cognitive function in hyperthermia; From the viewpoint of executive and inhibitive cognitive processing.高热对认知功能的抑制;从执行和抑制性认知加工的角度。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 7;7:43528. doi: 10.1038/srep43528.
9
Different proactive and reactive action control in fencers' and boxers' brain.击剑运动员和拳击运动员大脑中不同的主动和反应性动作控制。
Neuroscience. 2017 Feb 20;343:260-268. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
10
Cortical hyper-excitability in healthy children: evidence from habituation and recovery cycle phenomena of somatosensory evoked potentials.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Aug;58(8):855-60. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13072. Epub 2016 Feb 21.