Suppr超能文献

在 Go/NoGo 任务中,ERP 反应的刺激前α和β决定因素。

Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.

机构信息

Centre for Psychophysics, Psychophysiology, and Psychopharmacology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Jul;89(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 2.

Abstract

The nature of the relationships between the level of immediately-prestimulus EEG activity and auditory ERP components remains unclear. Particularly, both inverse and direct relationships have been reported for the alpha band. Here we aim to clarify the pattern of prestimulus EEG contributions in alpha (8-13 Hz), and investigate those in beta (14-24 Hz), for five ERP components (P1, N1, P2, N2, P3) in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo paradigm. Separate FFTs were applied to the prestimulus Cz data of each accepted trial. The alpha and beta bands were independently assessed. The mean prestimulus spectral band amplitude was computed and used to sort the trials at nine central sites, and the upper and lower sorted trial thirds were averaged to form ERPs for Go and NoGo responses. Prestimulus EEG level effects (High vs. Low) were examined in each component's latency and amplitude, and Go reaction time was also assessed. Prestimulus alpha directly modulated the amplitude of the positive components (P1, P2, P3), while prestimulus beta directly modulated the positivity of the exogenous component amplitudes (P1, N1, P2); each amplitude effect occurred independently of the Go/NoGo stimulus conditions. Prestimulus beta also inversely modulated Go N1 latency; no reaction time effects were found for either band. The pattern of findings is intriguing and the various modulations are discussed in relation to attention and arousal. Together, these results confirm the importance of the EEG brain state immediately prestimulus, and indicate the considerable influence that these states have on event-related response processing.

摘要

目前尚不清楚即时脑电活动水平与听觉事件相关电位(ERP)成分之间关系的性质。特别是,α频段同时存在正相关和负相关关系。在这里,我们旨在明确α(8-13 Hz)频段的脑电活动对五种 ERP 成分(P1、N1、P2、N2、P3)的贡献模式,并研究β(14-24 Hz)频段的贡献模式,采用听觉等概率 Go/NoGo 范式。对每个被接受试验的 Cz 部位的预刺激数据进行单独的快速傅里叶变换(FFT)。分别评估α和β频段。计算了预刺激时频谱带幅度的平均值,并将试验在九个中央部位进行排序,将排序后的上、下三分之一试验平均,形成 Go 和 NoGo 反应的 ERP。在每个成分的潜伏期和振幅中检查预刺激 EEG 水平效应(高 vs. 低),并评估 Go 反应时间。预刺激α直接调制正性成分(P1、P2、P3)的振幅,而预刺激β直接调制外源性成分振幅的正性(P1、N1、P2);每个振幅效应都独立于 Go/NoGo 刺激条件。预刺激β还反向调制 Go N1 潜伏期;在任何频段都未发现反应时间效应。研究结果令人着迷,各种调制均与注意力和觉醒相关进行了讨论。总之,这些结果证实了即时预刺激脑电状态的重要性,并表明这些状态对事件相关反应处理有相当大的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验