中国培养科研诚信的五种方式。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Five ways China must cultivate research integrity.

作者信息

Tang Li

出版信息

Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7784):589-591. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03613-1.

DOI:10.1038/d41586-019-03613-1

PMID:31768041

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Five ways China must cultivate research integrity.

Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7784):589-591. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03613-1.

[Role of research institutions in management of scientific fraud: The example of Inserm Scientific Integrity delegation].

Presse Med. 2012 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):841-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

Frequent cases force China to face up to scientific fraud.

Nat Med. 2006 Aug;12(8):867. doi: 10.1038/nm0806-867a. Epub 2006 Jul 27.

Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.

IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11.

Legal defenses to the use of data digits to identify fabricated data.

IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):77-80. doi: 10.1109/memb.2002.1046119.

Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.

Science. 2000 Dec 1;290(5497):1662-3. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5497.1662.

Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.

Nature. 2013 Nov 28;503(7477):454-7. doi: 10.1038/503454a.

Academic misconduct and detection.

Radiol Technol. 2010 Jan-Feb;81(3):276-9.

How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.

Dev World Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(2):64-75. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12231. Epub 2019 May 15.

Keeping a clean research environment: Addressing research misconduct and improving scientific integrity in China.

Cancer Lett. 2019 Nov 1;464:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

Aligning Scientific Values and Research Integrity: A Study of Researchers' Perceptions and Practices in Four Countries.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jun 2;31(3):15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00539-y.

Combating China's retraction crisis.

Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr;9(4):631-634. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02099-w.

Current situation and influence factors of scientific integrity in China: A multicenter survey.

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Dec 22;11(2):100365. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100365. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study.

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04459-y.

Distortion of journal impact factors in the era of paper mills.

Mol Ther. 2023 Jun 7;31(6):1503-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 25.

A study on the content of integrity policies and research integrity management in Chinese universities.

Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Feb 10;8:943228. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.943228. eCollection 2023.

Chinese institutions should be more proactive and transparent in promoting research integrity: A perspective.

Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Nov 9;7:999182. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.999182. eCollection 2022.

Reflections on the withdrawal of medical articles and the development of writing and publishing standards.

Cancer Biol Med. 2022 Sep 23;19(9):1283-9. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0437.

China's Research Evaluation Reform: What are the Consequences for Global Science?

Minerva. 2022;60(3):329-347. doi: 10.1007/s11024-022-09468-7. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities.

Scientometrics. 2021;126(8):6871-6889. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03987-y. Epub 2021 May 23.

本文引用的文献

Make reports of research misconduct public.

Nature. 2019 Jun;570(7759):7. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01728-z.

Reboot ethics governance in China.

Nature. 2019 May;569(7755):184-186. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-01408-y.

The preregistration revolution.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114.

Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.

PLoS One. 2015 Jun 17;10(6):e0127556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127556. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验