Juul J, Lie B, Friberg Nielsen S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sct. Maria Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(3):203-6. doi: 10.3109/00016348809004202.
A prospective study based upon interviews included 92 women who had undergone cesarean section, 38% with epidural analgesia and 62% under general anesthesia. The two groups were compared with respect to anesthesiological complications, postoperative morbidity and birth experience. The puerperal period was less complicated after epidural analgesia than after general anesthesia. There was a quicker re-establishment of the gastrointestinal function after epidural analgesia and the patients were more quickly mobilized and less tired. The overall morbidity after cesarean section, 16%, was lower than in other studies. Nearly half of the patients in the epidural experienced slight peroperative pain. In the case of repeated cesarean section, 86% of women who had epidural analgesia wanted the same anesthesia again. On the basis of this study, epidural analgesia is recommended for cesarean section.
一项基于访谈的前瞻性研究纳入了92例行剖宫产的女性,其中38%接受硬膜外镇痛,62%接受全身麻醉。对两组在麻醉并发症、术后发病率和分娩体验方面进行了比较。硬膜外镇痛后的产褥期比全身麻醉后并发症更少。硬膜外镇痛后胃肠功能恢复更快,患者能更快活动且疲劳感更轻。剖宫产术后的总体发病率为16%,低于其他研究。硬膜外组近一半的患者术中经历了轻微疼痛。在再次剖宫产的情况下,86%接受硬膜外镇痛的女性希望再次采用相同的麻醉方式。基于这项研究,推荐剖宫产采用硬膜外镇痛。