Suppr超能文献

糖尿病视网膜病变中广角扫频源光学相干断层扫描血管造影的影像伪影与分割误差

Imaging Artifacts and Segmentation Errors With Wide-Field Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy.

作者信息

Cui Ying, Zhu Ying, Wang Jay C, Lu Yifan, Zeng Rebecca, Katz Raviv, Wu David M, Vavvas Demetrios G, Husain Deeba, Miller Joan W, Kim Leo A, Miller John B

机构信息

Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Guangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Nov 15;8(6):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.6.18. eCollection 2019 Nov.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze imaging artifacts and segmentation errors with wide-field swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) in diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational study at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from December 2018 to March 2019. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), diabetic patients with no diabetic retinopathy (DR), and healthy control eyes were included. All patients were imaged with a SS-OCTA and the Montage Angio (15 × 9 mm) was used for analysis. Images were independently evaluated by two graders using the motion artifact score (MAS). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 and R software.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six eyes in 98 participants with the montage image were included in the study. Patients with more severe stages of DR had higher MAS by trend test analysis ( < 0.05). The occurrence of segmentation error was 0% in the healthy group, 10.53% in the no DR group, 10.00% in the NPDR group, and 50% in the PDR group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the severity of DR and dry eye were the major factors affecting MAS ( < 0.05). There were some modifiable artifacts that could be corrected to improve image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide field SS-OCTA assesses retinal microvascular changes by noninvasive techniques, yet distinguishing real alterations from artifacts is paramount to accurate interpretations. DR severity and dry eye correlated with MAS.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Understanding contributing factors and methods to reduce artifacts is critical to routine use and clinical trial with wide-field SS-OCTA.

摘要

目的

分析广角扫频源光学相干断层扫描血管造影(SS-OCTA)在糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)中的成像伪影和分割误差。

方法

2018年12月至2019年3月在马萨诸塞州眼耳医院进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。纳入增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)、非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)、无糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的糖尿病患者以及健康对照眼。所有患者均接受SS-OCTA成像,并使用蒙太奇血管造影(15×9 mm)进行分析。图像由两名分级者使用运动伪影评分(MAS)进行独立评估。所有统计分析均使用SPSS 25.0和R软件进行。

结果

98名参与者的136只眼的蒙太奇图像纳入研究。通过趋势检验分析,DR病情较重阶段的患者MAS较高(<0.05)。健康组分割误差发生率为0%,无DR组为10.53%,NPDR组为10.00%,PDR组为50%。多因素回归分析表明,DR严重程度和干眼是影响MAS的主要因素(<0.05)。存在一些可修正的伪影,可进行校正以提高图像质量。

结论

广角SS-OCTA通过非侵入性技术评估视网膜微血管变化,但区分真实改变与伪影对于准确解读至关重要。DR严重程度和干眼与MAS相关。

转化相关性

了解导致伪影的因素及减少伪影的方法对于广角SS-OCTA的常规应用和临床试验至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/913f/6859832/b19603cef90c/i2164-2591-8-6-18-f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验