Fossum Croix C, Beltran Chris J, Whitaker Thomas J, Ma Daniel J, Foote Robert L
Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Int J Part Ther. 2017 Fall;4(2):18-25. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-17-00015. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
To use a linear energy transfer (LET) dependent formula for relative biological effectiveness (RBE) to generate a biological model that can be used to predict toxicity in patients treated with proton therapy for cancer of the head and neck.
Patients treated with protons to a dose of 60 to 70 Gy (RBE = 1.1) for head and neck cancer were eligible to participate in this study. Treatment plans were developed using graphics processing unit Monte Carlo calculations. The equation, RBE = (1.1)[0.08(LET)+0.88], was the biological model. The physical model assumes RBE = 1.1. Tumor volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were contoured, and isodose lines were created for 105%-120% of the prescribed dose. Dose to volume of OARs was calculated for both models for comparative purposes. Physician-reported toxicity was graded from 0 to 5 using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using the Promis10 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's QLQ-H&N35 instruments.
Eleven patients were included in this study. In each case the biological model revealed an increased dose to several OARs compared with the physical model. For selected OARs, the volume receiving >105% of the target dose was 2-fold to 15-fold greater in the biological model than the volume predicted by the physical model. Patients experienced toxicity that was consistent with the dose to OARs predicted by the biological model. Furthermore, 1 patient developed mucosal ulceration and another developed osteoradionecrosis at the location of a biological hot spot. In each case, the biological hot spot was located 2 mm inside the clinical target volume.
The results suggest that increases in dose predicted by the biological model are clinically relevant and that LET and RBE corrections and optimization should be a component of the treatment-planning process in proton therapy.
使用基于线性能量传递(LET)的相对生物效应(RBE)公式生成一个生物模型,该模型可用于预测接受质子治疗的头颈癌患者的毒性。
接受质子治疗、剂量为60至70 Gy(RBE = 1.1)的头颈癌患者符合参与本研究的条件。使用图形处理单元蒙特卡罗计算制定治疗计划。生物模型的方程为RBE = (1.1)[0.08(LET)+0.88]。物理模型假设RBE = 1.1。勾勒出肿瘤体积和危及器官(OARs),并创建规定剂量105% - 120%的等剂量线。为进行比较,计算了两种模型下OARs的剂量体积。使用不良事件通用术语标准4.03版将医生报告的毒性从0至5级进行分级。使用患者报告结果测量信息系统10(Promis10)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的QLQ - H&N35工具获取患者报告的结果。
本研究纳入了11名患者。在每种情况下,生物模型显示与物理模型相比,多个OARs的剂量增加。对于选定的OARs,接受超过目标剂量105%的体积在生物模型中比物理模型预测的体积大2倍至15倍。患者经历的毒性与生物模型预测的OARs剂量一致。此外,1名患者发生黏膜溃疡,另1名患者在生物热点部位发生骨放射性坏死。在每种情况下,生物热点位于临床靶体积内2毫米处。
结果表明生物模型预测的剂量增加具有临床相关性,并且LET和RBE校正及优化应成为质子治疗计划过程的一部分。