Chastre J, Fagon J Y, Soler P, Bornet M, Domart Y, Trouillet J L, Gibert C, Hance A J
Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Am J Med. 1988 Oct;85(4):499-506. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(88)80085-8.
To compare the usefulness of specimens recovered using a protected specimen brush and those recovered by bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia occurring in intubated patients undergoing ventilation, we performed both procedures in patients suspected of having pneumonia because of the presence of a new pulmonary infiltrate and purulent tracheal secretions.
Twenty-one patients (16 men and five women) with an average age of 57 +/- 12 years were studied. They had been receiving mechanical ventilation for 8 +/- 6 days before inclusion in the trial. The clinical suspicion for nosocomial bacterial pneumonia was high in these patients. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed in each patient. Bronchoscopy specimens were obtained by a protected specimen brush and by bronchoalveolar lavage, and were then processed for quantitative bacterial and fungal culture using standard methods. Total cell counts were performed on an aliquot of resuspended original lavage fluid. Differential cell counts were made on at least 500 cells. In addition, 300 cells were examined at high-power magnification and the percentage of cells containing intracellular microorganisms and the average number of extracellular organisms per oil-immersion field were determined.
Quantitative culture of specimens recovered using the protected specimen brush were positive (more than 10(3) colony-forming units [cfu]/ml) in five of five patients with subsequently confirmed pneumonia, and negative (less than 10(3) cfu/ml) in 13 of 13 patients without bacterial pneumonia, but results were not available until 24 to 48 hours after the procedure. Quantification of intracellular organisms in cells recovered by lavage was also useful in distinguishing patients with pneumonia (more than 25 percent of cells with intracellular organisms in five of five patients) from those without pneumonia (less than 15 percent of cells with intracellular organisms in all cases), and results were available immediately. In contrast, quantitative culture of lavage fluid and differential cell counts were of little value in identifying infected patients.
The protected specimen brush and microscopic identification of intracellular organisms in cells recovered by lavage yield useful and complementary information, and together permit rapid and specific treatment of most patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
为比较使用防污染标本刷采集的标本与通过支气管肺泡灌洗回收的标本在诊断接受通气的插管患者医院获得性肺炎中的有用性,我们对因出现新的肺部浸润和脓性气管分泌物而疑似患有肺炎的患者同时进行了这两种操作。
研究了21例患者(16例男性和5例女性),平均年龄为57±12岁。在纳入试验前,他们已接受机械通气8±6天。这些患者医院获得性细菌性肺炎的临床怀疑度很高。对每位患者进行了纤维支气管镜检查。通过防污染标本刷和支气管肺泡灌洗获取支气管镜标本,然后使用标准方法对其进行定量细菌和真菌培养。对一份重悬的原始灌洗液进行总细胞计数。对至少500个细胞进行分类细胞计数。此外,在高倍放大下检查300个细胞,并确定含有细胞内微生物的细胞百分比以及每个油镜视野中细胞外微生物的平均数。
在随后确诊为肺炎的5例患者中,使用防污染标本刷回收的标本定量培养呈阳性(超过10³菌落形成单位[cfu]/ml),在13例无细菌性肺炎的患者中呈阴性(低于10³ cfu/ml),但结果在操作后24至48小时才可得。对灌洗回收细胞中的细胞内微生物进行定量也有助于区分患有肺炎的患者(5例患者中有5例细胞内微生物细胞超过25%)和未患肺炎的患者(所有病例中细胞内微生物细胞低于15%),且结果可立即获得。相比之下,灌洗液的定量培养和分类细胞计数在识别感染患者方面价值不大。
防污染标本刷和对灌洗回收细胞中细胞内微生物的显微镜鉴定产生有用且互补的信息,并共同允许对大多数医院获得性肺炎患者进行快速且特异性的治疗。