Dotters D J, Carney C N, Droegemueller W
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7570.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Oct;159(4):814-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(88)80143-1.
A prospective, randomized study was performed to compare the efficacy of a combined endocervical and ectocervical nylon brush with the cotton-tipped swab and wooden spatula for obtaining cervical cytologic specimens. Strict objective criteria were used to determine the adequacy of Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the number of cells present. The two methods were equally effective in collecting ectocervical smears. However, 96% of endocervical smears obtained with the nylon brush contained greater than 50 cells, compared with 58% of swab and spatula smears. Only 1.4% of brush samples contained no endocervical cells, versus 19% of swab and spatula smears. The presence of endocervical cells confirms adequate sampling of the transitional zone. Use of the cytologic Papanicolaou brush may result in fewer false negative and inadequate Papanicolaou smears.
进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以比较宫颈内和宫颈外尼龙刷与棉拭子及木质刮板在获取宫颈细胞学标本方面的效果。基于存在的细胞数量,采用严格的客观标准来确定巴氏涂片的充分性。两种方法在采集宫颈外涂片方面同样有效。然而,用尼龙刷获取的宫颈内涂片中有96%含有超过50个细胞,相比之下,拭子和刮板涂片的这一比例为58%。只有1.4%的刷子样本没有宫颈内细胞,而拭子和刮板涂片的这一比例为19%。宫颈内细胞的存在证实了对移行带的充分取样。使用细胞学巴氏刷可能会减少巴氏涂片的假阴性和不充分情况。