Department of Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Prevention and Rehabilitation, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E563-E572.
We have applied a new method called "the pumping technique" to the capsule-preserving hydraulic distension for frozen shoulder. With this technique, the stretching effect can be directly applied to the joint capsule of the affected shoulder.
We attempted to evaluate the effect of capsule-preserving hydraulic distension using the pumping technique by comparing capsule-preserving hydraulic distension without it.
A case-controlled, retrospective, comparative study.
Outpatient clinic of department of rehabilitation medicine in a single university hospital.
Patients (n = 47) with frozen shoulder who were treated with hydraulic distension were assigned into the pumping group (n = 24) and the nonpumping group (n = 23). Range of motion (ROM), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were assessed.
Significant improvement of VAS, ROM, and SPADI scores was observed after the second injection in each group (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in total passive ROM, abduction, and flexion after the fifth injection between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the disability domain of SPADI after the second injection between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant interaction between time and group with respect to VAS scores. There were no serious complications after procedures.
This was a retrospective study. There might be some limitations in gathering comprehensive records of outcome measurements. In addition, because the objective of this study was to determine the effect of the new pumping technique, included patients range was very narrow. This study only included patients who were treated 5 times with capsule-preserving hydraulic distensions with or without the pumping technique.
Although the effect on pain was excellent in both groups, the superiority of the new pumping technique was demonstrated by reduction of SPADI disability subscale score and improvement of ROM of the shoulder compared with the nonpumping technique.
Shoulder pain, injections, stretch, exercise, ultrasonography, joint capsule, steroids, range of motion.
我们应用一种新方法“抽吸技术”于囊内保留液压扩张治疗冻结肩。利用这种技术,牵伸效应可直接施加于患肩的关节囊。
通过比较保留囊内液压扩张术有无抽吸技术,尝试评估保留囊内液压扩张术联合抽吸技术的效果。
病例对照、回顾性、对比研究。
一所大学附属医院康复医学科门诊。
纳入接受液压扩张治疗的冻结肩患者,根据是否应用抽吸技术分为抽吸组(n = 24)和非抽吸组(n = 23)。评估两组患者的关节活动度(ROM)、肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)。
两组患者在每两次注射后 VAS、ROM 和 SPADI 评分均显著改善(P < 0.05)。在第五次注射后,两组患者的总被动 ROM、外展和前屈有显著差异(P < 0.05)。两组患者在 SPADI 中的残疾领域在第二次注射后有显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,VAS 评分在时间和组之间无显著交互作用。治疗后均无严重并发症。
本研究为回顾性研究,在收集全面的结局测量记录方面可能存在一定的局限性。此外,由于本研究的目的是确定新的抽吸技术的效果,因此纳入的患者范围非常狭窄。本研究仅纳入接受 5 次囊内保留液压扩张术治疗的患者,且治疗中应用或未应用抽吸技术。
虽然两组患者的疼痛缓解效果均较好,但与非抽吸技术相比,新的抽吸技术在减少 SPADI 残疾亚量表评分和改善肩关节 ROM 方面具有优势。
肩痛、注射、拉伸、运动、超声检查、关节囊、类固醇、关节活动度。