Diamond M P, Stewart E A, Williams A R W, Carr B R, Myers E R, Feldman R A, Elger W, Mattia-Goldberg C, Schwefel B M, Chwalisz K
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Hum Reprod Open. 2019 Nov 4;2019(4):hoz027. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz027. eCollection 2019.
What is the safety and efficacy profile during long-term (12-24 months) uninterrupted treatment with the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil, 10 and 25 mg in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with uterine fibroids?
Uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil should be avoided due to endometrial safety concerns and unknown potential long-term consequences.
Asoprisnil was well tolerated in shorter-term studies and effectively suppressed HMB and reduced fibroid volume.
Women with uterine fibroids who had previously received placebo ( = 87) or asoprisnil 10 mg ( = 221) or 25 mg ( = 215) for 12 months in two double-blind studies entered this randomized uncontrolled extension study and received up to 12 additional months of treatment followed by 6 months of post-treatment follow-up. Women who previously received placebo were re-randomized to either asoprisnil 10 or 25 mg for the extension study. This report focuses on the 436 women who received asoprisnil in the double-blind studies and this extension study. Results for women who previously received placebo in the double-blind studies are not described.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Women ≥18 years of age who completed a 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, had estradiol levels indicating that they were not menopausal and had no endometrial hyperplasia or other significant endometrial pathology were eligible. The safety endpoints were focused on endometrial assessments. The composite primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of women who demonstrated a response to treatment by meeting all three of the following criteria at the final month for participants who prematurely discontinued or at month 12 for those who completed the study: a reduction from initial baseline to final visit of ≥50% in the menstrual pictogram score, hemoglobin concentration ≥11 g/dl or an increase of ≥1 g/dl from initial baseline at the final visit, and no surgical or invasive intervention for uterine fibroids. Other efficacy endpoints included rates for amenorrhea and suppression of bleeding, changes in fibroid and uterine volume and changes in hematologic parameters. No statistical tests were planned or performed for this uncontrolled study.
Imaging studies revealed a progressive increase in endometrial thickness and cystic changes that frequently prompted invasive diagnostic procedures. Endometrial biopsy results were consistent with antiproliferative effects of asoprisnil. Two cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed. At the final month of this extension study (total duration of uninterrupted treatment up to 24 months), the primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 86 and 92% of women in the asoprisnil 10- and 25-mg groups, respectively. During each month of treatment, amenorrhea was observed in the majority of women (up to 77 and 94% at 10 and 25 mg, respectively). There was a progressive, dose-dependent decrease in the volume of the primary fibroid with asoprisnil 10 and 25 mg (-55.7 and -75.2% median decrease, respectively, from baseline [i.e. the beginning of the placebo-controlled study] to month 12 [cumulative months 12-24] of this extension study). These effects were associated with improvements in quality of life measures.
This study was uncontrolled, which limits the interpretation of safety and efficacy findings. The study also had multiple protocol amendments with the addition of diagnostic procedures and, because no active comparator was included, the potential place of asoprisnil in comparison to therapies such as GnRH agonists and surgery cannot be determined.
Long-term, uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil leads to prominent cystic endometrial changes that are consistent with the 'late progesterone receptor modulator' effects, which prompted invasive diagnostic procedures, although treatment efficacy is maintained. Although endometrial cancers were uncommon during both treatment and follow-up, these findings raise concerns regarding endometrial safety during uninterrupted long-term treatment with asoprisnil. This study shows that uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil should be avoided due to safety concerns and unknown potential long-term consequences.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: AbbVie Inc. (prior sponsor, TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.) sponsored the study and contributed to the design and conduct of the study, data management, data analysis, interpretation of the data and the preparation and approval of the manuscript. Financial support for medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by AbbVie Inc. M. P. Diamond received research funding for the conduct of the study paid to the institution and is a consultant to AbbVie. He is a stockholder and board and director member of Advanced Reproductive Care. He has also received funding for study conduct paid to the institution for Bayer and ObsEva. E. A. Stewart participated as a site investigator in the phase 2 study of asoprisnil and served as a consultant to TAP Pharmaceuticals during the time of design and conduct of the studies while on the faculty of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. In the last 3 years, she has received support from National Institutes of Health grants HD063312, HS023418 and HD074711. She has served as a consultant for AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Bayer HealthCare AG and Myovant for consulting related to uterine leiomyoma and to Welltwigs for consulting related to infertility. She has received royalties from UpToDate and the Med Learning Group. A.R.W. Williams has acted as a consultant for TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. and Repros Therapeutics Inc. He has current consultancies with PregLem SA, Gedeon Richter, HRA Pharma and Bayer. B.R. Carr has served as consultant and received research funding from AbbVie Inc. and Synteract (Medicines360). E.R. Myers has served as consultant for AbbVie Inc., Allergan and Bayer. R.A. Feldman received compensation for serving as a principal investigator and participating in the conduct of the trial. W. Elger was a co-inventor of several patents related to asoprisnil.C. Mattia-Goldberg is a former employee of AbbVie Inc. and owns AbbVie stock or stock options. B.M. Schwefel and K. Chwalisz are employees of AbbVie Inc. and own AbbVie stock or stock options.
NCT00156195 at clinicaltrials.gov.
对于患有与子宫肌瘤相关的月经过多(HMB)的女性,使用选择性孕激素受体调节剂阿索普瑞尼10毫克和25毫克进行长期(12 - 24个月)不间断治疗时,其安全性和有效性如何?
由于子宫内膜安全性问题以及潜在的长期后果不明,应避免使用阿索普瑞尼进行不间断治疗。
在短期研究中,阿索普瑞尼耐受性良好,能有效抑制月经过多并减小肌瘤体积。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:在两项双盲研究中,曾接受过12个月安慰剂(n = 87)、阿索普瑞尼10毫克(n = 221)或25毫克(n = 215)治疗的子宫肌瘤女性进入了这项随机非对照扩展研究,接受长达12个月的额外治疗,随后进行6个月的治疗后随访。曾接受安慰剂治疗的女性在扩展研究中被重新随机分配至阿索普瑞尼10毫克或25毫克组。本报告聚焦于在双盲研究及该扩展研究中接受阿索普瑞尼治疗的436名女性。未描述在双盲研究中曾接受安慰剂治疗的女性的结果。
参与者/材料、环境、方法:年龄≥18岁、完成了一项为期12个月的双盲、安慰剂对照研究、雌二醇水平表明未处于绝经状态且无子宫内膜增生或其他显著子宫内膜病变的女性符合条件。安全性终点主要关注子宫内膜评估。复合主要疗效终点是在最终月份(对于提前停药的参与者)或第12个月(对于完成研究的参与者)达到以下所有三项标准的女性比例,即月经图像评分从初始基线降至最终访视时降低≥50%、血红蛋白浓度≥11 g/dl或在最终访视时较初始基线增加≥1 g/dl,且未对子宫肌瘤进行手术或侵入性干预。其他疗效终点包括闭经率和出血抑制率、肌瘤和子宫体积变化以及血液学参数变化。对于这项非对照研究,未计划或进行统计检验。
影像学研究显示子宫内膜厚度和囊性变化逐渐增加,这常常促使进行侵入性诊断程序。子宫内膜活检结果与阿索普瑞尼的抗增殖作用一致。诊断出两例子宫内膜癌。在该扩展研究的最后一个月(不间断治疗的总时长可达24个月),阿索普瑞尼10毫克和25毫克组分别有86%和92%的女性达到主要疗效终点。在每个治疗月期间,大多数女性出现闭经(10毫克和25毫克组分别高达77%和94%)。阿索普瑞尼10毫克和25毫克组的主要肌瘤体积呈渐进性、剂量依赖性减小(从基线[即安慰剂对照研究开始时]到该扩展研究的第12个月[累计第12 - 24个月],中位数分别下降 - 55.7%和 - 75.2%)。这些效应与生活质量指标的改善相关。
局限性、谨慎的原因:本研究为非对照研究,这限制了对安全性和有效性结果的解读。该研究还有多项方案修订,增加了诊断程序,并且由于未纳入活性对照,无法确定与GnRH激动剂和手术等疗法相比阿索普瑞尼的潜在地位。
长期不间断使用阿索普瑞尼会导致明显的子宫内膜囊性变化,这与“晚期孕激素受体调节剂”效应一致,尽管维持了治疗效果,但这促使进行侵入性诊断程序。尽管在治疗和随访期间子宫内膜癌并不常见,但这些发现引发了对阿索普瑞尼长期不间断治疗期间子宫内膜安全性的担忧。本研究表明,出于安全性考虑和潜在长期后果不明,应避免使用阿索普瑞尼进行不间断治疗。
研究资金/利益冲突:艾伯维公司(前赞助商,TAP制药产品公司)赞助了该研究,并参与了研究的设计与实施、数据管理、数据分析、数据解读以及稿件的撰写和审批。艾伯维公司提供了医学写作和编辑协助的资金支持。M.P. 戴蒙德因开展该研究获得了支付给机构的研究资金,并且是艾伯维公司的顾问。他是Advanced Reproductive Care的股东以及董事会和董事成员。他还因开展研究获得了支付给机构的拜耳和ObsEva的资金。E.A. 斯图尔特作为阿索普瑞尼2期研究的现场研究者参与研究,并在哈佛大学医学院和波士顿布莱根妇女医院任职期间,在研究设计和实施阶段担任TAP制药公司的顾问。在过去3年中,她获得了美国国立卫生研究院HD063312、HS023418和HD074711的资助。她曾担任艾伯维公司、艾尔建、拜耳医疗保健公司和Myovant关于子宫平滑肌瘤的咨询顾问以及Welltwigs关于不孕症的咨询顾问。她从UpToDate和Med Learning Group获得版税。A.R.W. 威廉姆斯曾担任TAP制药产品公司和Repros Therapeutics公司的顾问。他目前是PregLem SA、吉德昂·里奇特、HRA制药和拜耳的顾问。B.R. 卡尔曾担任顾问,并从艾伯维公司和Synteract(Medicines360)获得研究资金。E.R. 迈尔斯曾担任艾伯维公司、艾尔建和拜耳的顾问。R.A. 费尔德曼因担任主要研究者并参与试验实施而获得报酬。W. 埃尔格是与阿索普瑞尼相关的多项专利的共同发明人。C. 马蒂亚 - 戈德堡是艾伯维公司的前员工,拥有艾伯维公司的股票或股票期权。B.M. 施韦费尔和K. 奇瓦利什是艾伯维公司的员工,拥有艾伯维公司的股票或股票期权。
clinicaltrials.gov上的NCT00156195