Department of Gynecology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Gynecology, Société de Recherche pour l'Infertilité (SRI), Brussels, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1208-1221. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae076.
Does linzagolix administered orally once daily for up to 3 months at a dose of 75 mg alone or 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (ABT) (1.0 mg estradiol; 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate, also known as norethisterone acetate [NETA]) demonstrate better efficacy than placebo in the management of endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain?
Combining 200 mg linzagolix with ABT was found to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain at 3 months of therapy, while a daily dose of 75 mg linzagolix yielded a significant decrease only in dysmenorrhea at 3 months.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: A previously published Phase 2, dose-finding study reported that at a dose of 200 mg daily, linzagolix promotes full suppression of estradiol secretion to serum levels below 20 pg/ml and noted that the addition of ABT may be needed to manage hypoestrogenic side effects. At lower doses (75 mg and 100 mg/day), linzagolix maintains estradiol values within the target range of 20-60 pg/ml, which could be ideal to alleviate symptoms linked to endometriosis.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: EDELWEISS 3 was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of linzagolix for the treatment of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Treatment was administered orally once daily for up to 6 months.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the EDELWEISS 3 trial, 486 subjects with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three study groups: placebo, 75 mg linzagolix alone or 200 mg linzagolix in association with ABT. Pain was measured daily on a verbal rating scale and recorded in an electronic diary.
At 3 months, the daily 200 mg linzagolix dose with ABT met the primary efficacy objective, showing clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, with stable or decreased use of analgesics. The proportion of responders for dysmenorrhea in the 200 mg linzagolix with ABT group was 72.9% compared with 23.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), while the rates of responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain were 47.3% and 30.9% (P = 0.007), respectively. The 75 mg linzagolix daily dose demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant reduction in dysmenorrhea versus placebo at 3 months. The proportion of responders for dysmenorrhea in the 75 mg linzagolix group was 44.0% compared with 23.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Although the 75 mg dose showed a trend toward reduction in non-menstrual pelvic pain at 3 months relative to the placebo, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.279). Significant improvements in dyschezia and overall pelvic pain were observed in both linzagolix groups when compared to placebo. Small improvements in dyspareunia scores were observed in both linzagolix groups but they were not significant. In both groups, hypoestrogenic effects were mild, with low rates of hot flushes and bone density loss of <1%. A daily dose of 200 mg linzagolix with ABT or 75 mg linzagolix alone was found to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain also at 6 months of therapy.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Efficacy was compared between linzagolix groups and placebo; however, it would be useful to have results from comparative studies with estro-progestogens or progestogens. It will be important to ascertain whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have significant benefits over traditional first-line medications.
Linzagolix administered orally once daily at a dose of 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (ABT) demonstrated better efficacy and safety than placebo in the management of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. The quality of life was improved and the risks of bone loss and vasomotor symptoms were minimized due to the ABT. The 75 mg dose alone could be suitable for chronic treatment of endometriosis-associated pain without the need for concomitant hormonal ABT, but further research is needed to confirm this. If confirmed, it would offer a viable option for women who do not want to wish to have ABT or for whom it is contraindicated.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding for the EDELWEISS 3 study was provided by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland). Analysis of data and manuscript writing were partially supported by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland), Theramex (London, UK) and Kissei (Japan) and grant 5/4/150/5 was awarded to M.-M.D. by FNRS. J.D. was a member of the scientific advisory board of ObsEva until August 2022, a member of the scientific advisory board of PregLem, and received personal fees from Gedeon Richter, ObsEva and Theramex. J.D. received consulting fees, speakers' fees, and travel support from Gedeon Richter, Obseva and Theramex, which was paid to their institution. C.B. has received fees from Theramex, Gedeon Richter, and Myovant, and travel support from Gedeon Richter-all funds went to the University of Oxford. He was a member of the data monitoring board supervising the current study, and served at an advisory board for endometriosis studies of Myovant. H.T. has received grants from Abbvie and was past president of ASRM. F.C.H. has received fees from Gedeon Richter and Theramex. O.D. received fees for lectures from Gedeon Richter and ObsEva and research grants for clinical studies from Preglem and ObsEva independent from the current study. A.H. has received grants from NIHR, UKRI, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, and Roche Diagnostics; he has received fees from Theramex. A.H.'s institution has received honoraria for consultancy from Roche Diagnostics, Gesynta, and Joii. M.P. has nothing to declare. F.P. has received fees from Theramex. S.P.R. has been a member of the scientific advisory board of Gedeon Richter and received fees from Gedeon Richter. A.P. and M.B. are employees of Theramex. E.B. was an employee of ObsEva, sponsor chair of the data monitoring board supervising the current study, and has been working as a consultant for Theramex since December 2022; she owns stock options in ObsEva. M.-M.D. has received fees and travel support from Gedeon Richter and Theramex.
NCT03992846.
20 June 2019.
DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 13 June 2019.
在为期 3 个月的治疗中,与安慰剂相比,每日口服一次 75mg 林扎戈利克斯单独治疗或与添加激素治疗(ABT)(1.0mg 雌二醇;0.5mg 醋酸去氧孕烯,也称为醋酸甲地孕酮[NETA])联合治疗 200mg 林扎戈利克斯在治疗子宫内膜异位症相关痛经和非经期盆腔痛方面是否更有效?
在 3 个月的治疗中,联合使用 200mg 林扎戈利克斯和 ABT 可显著降低痛经和非经期盆腔痛,而每日 75mg 林扎戈利克斯剂量仅在 3 个月时可显著降低痛经。
先前发表的一项 2 期剂量发现研究报告称,每日 200mg 林扎戈利克斯可促进雌二醇分泌完全抑制,血清水平低于 20pg/ml,并指出可能需要添加 ABT 来管理低雌激素副作用。在较低剂量(75mg 和 100mg/天)下,林扎戈利克斯将雌二醇值维持在 20-60pg/ml 的目标范围内,这可能是缓解与子宫内膜异位症相关症状的理想选择。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:EDELWEISS 3 是一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、双模拟的 3 期研究,旨在评估林扎戈利克斯治疗中重度子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的安全性和疗效。治疗持续时间为 6 个月,每日口服一次。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:在 EDELWEISS 3 试验中,486 名中重度子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛患者以 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至三组研究之一:安慰剂、75mg 林扎戈利克斯单独或 200mg 林扎戈利克斯联合 ABT。疼痛每天通过口头评分量表和电子日记记录。
在 3 个月时,每日 200mg 林扎戈利克斯联合 ABT 剂量达到了主要疗效终点,与安慰剂相比,痛经和非经期盆腔痛均具有临床意义且统计学显著改善,镇痛剂的使用稳定或减少。在 200mg 林扎戈利克斯联合 ABT 组中,痛经的应答者比例为 72.9%,安慰剂组为 23.5%(P<0.001),非经期盆腔痛的应答者比例分别为 47.3%和 30.9%(P=0.007)。每日 75mg 林扎戈利克斯剂量与安慰剂相比,在 3 个月时痛经具有临床意义且统计学显著改善。在 75mg 林扎戈利克斯组中,痛经的应答者比例为 44.0%,安慰剂组为 23.5%(P<0.001)。尽管 75mg 剂量在 3 个月时相对于安慰剂显示出非经期盆腔痛降低的趋势,但无统计学意义(P=0.279)。在林扎戈利克斯组中,均观察到排便困难和整体盆腔疼痛显著改善,而在安慰剂组中则没有。在两个林扎戈利克斯组中,均观察到性交困难评分略有改善,但无统计学意义。在两组中,低雌激素作用均较轻,潮热发生率低,骨密度丢失<1%。每日 200mg 林扎戈利克斯联合 ABT 或 75mg 林扎戈利克斯单独治疗 6 个月时也发现可显著减轻痛经和非经期盆腔痛。
局限性、谨慎原因:在林扎戈利克斯组与安慰剂组之间比较了疗效;然而,与雌激素孕激素或孕激素比较的对照研究结果将是有用的。确定促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂是否优于传统一线药物是否具有显著益处将非常重要。
每日口服一次 200mg 林扎戈利克斯联合 ABT 治疗在中重度子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的管理中比安慰剂更有效且安全。生活质量得到改善,由于添加了 ABT,骨质流失和血管舒缩症状的风险最小化。单独使用 75mg 剂量可能适合治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛,而无需同时进行激素 ABT,但需要进一步研究证实。如果得到证实,它将为不希望进行 ABT 或不适合进行 ABT 的女性提供一种可行的选择。
研究资金/利益冲突:EDELWEISS 3 研究的资金由 ObsEva(瑞士日内瓦)提供。数据分析和手稿撰写部分得到了 ObsEva(瑞士日内瓦)、Theramex(英国伦敦)和 Kissei(日本)的部分支持,5/4/150/5 赠款授予 M.-M.D.由 FNRS 颁发。J.D. 直到 2022 年 8 月一直是 ObsEva 的科学顾问委员会成员,是 PregLem 的科学顾问委员会成员,并从 Gedeon Richter、ObsEva 和 Theramex 获得了个人报酬。J.D. 从 Gedeon Richter、ObsEva 和 Theramex 获得了咨询费、演讲费和差旅费支持,这些都支付给了他的机构。C.B. 从 Theramex、Gedeon Richter 和 Myovant 获得了费用,并担任子宫内膜异位症研究的顾问委员会成员。他还是当前研究的数据监测委员会的监督委员会成员,并在 Myovant 的子宫内膜异位症研究中担任咨询委员会成员。H.T. 曾获得 Abbvie 的资助,也曾担任过 ASRM 的主席。F.C.H. 从 Gedeon Richter 和 Theramex 获得了费用。O.D. 因演讲获得了 Gedeon Richter 和 ObsEva 的费用,并获得了 Preglem 和 ObsEva 的临床研究赠款,与当前研究无关。A.H. 获得了来自 NIHR、UKRI、CSO、Wellbeing of Women 和 Roche Diagnostics 的资助;他获得了 Theramex 的费用。A.H. 的机构因咨询获得了 Roche Diagnostics、Gesynta 和 Joii 的酬金。M.P. 没有任何需要声明的内容。F.P. 从 Theramex 获得了费用。S.P.R. 曾是 Gedeon Richter 的科学顾问委员会成员,并获得了费用,他还是 Theramex 的顾问;自 2022 年 12 月以来,他一直在担任 ObsEva 的赞助主席,负责监督当前研究的数据监测委员会,并一直在担任 Theramex 的顾问;他拥有 ObsEva 的股票期权。M.-M.D. 从 Gedeon Richter 和 Theramex 获得了费用和差旅费支持。
NCT03992846。
2019 年 6 月 20 日。
2019 年 6 月 13 日。