Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, Endometriosis CaRe Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Hum Reprod. 2024 Mar 1;39(3):526-537. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead263.
What is the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment (up to 2 years) with relugolix combination therapy (CT) in women with moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain?
For up to 2 years, treatment with relugolix CT improved menstrual and non-menstrual pain, dyspareunia, and function in women with endometriosis; after an initial decline of <1%, the mean bone mineral density (BMD) remained stable with continued treatment.
Endometriosis is a chronic condition characterized by symptoms of dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), and dyspareunia, which have a substantial impact on the lives of affected women, their partners, and families. SPIRIT 1 and 2 were phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of once-daily relugolix CT (relugolix 40 mg, oestradiol 1 mg, norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg) in premenopausal women (age 18-50 years) with endometriosis and moderate-to-severe dysmenorrhea and NMPP. These trials demonstrated a significant improvement of dysmenorrhea, NMPP, and dyspareunia in women treated with relugolix CT, with minimal decline (<1%) in BMD versus placebo at 24 weeks.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Patients participating in this open-label, single-arm, long-term extension (LTE) study of the 24-week SPIRIT pivotal studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2) received up to an additional 80 weeks of once-daily oral relugolix CT treatment between May 2018 and January 2023.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Premenopausal women with confirmed endometriosis and moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and NMPP who completed the 24-week pivotal studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2 trials; Giudice et al., 2022) and who met all entry criteria were eligible to enrol. Two-year results were analysed by treatment group based on original randomization in pivotal studies: relugolix CT, delayed relugolix CT (relugolix 40 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks, followed by relugolix CT), or placebo→relugolix CT (placebo for 24 weeks followed by relugolix CT). The primary endpoints of the LTE study were the proportion of dysmenorrhea and NMPP responders at Week 52 and Week 104/end-of-treatment (EOT). A responder was a participant who achieved a predefined, clinically meaningful reduction from baseline in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) for the specific pain type with no increase in analgesic use. The predefined clinically meaningful threshold for dysmenorrhea was 2.8 points and for NMPP was 2.1 points. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) pain domain scores, a measure of the effects of endometriosis-associated pain on daily activities (function), NRS scores for dysmenorrhea, NMPP, dyspareunia, and overall pelvic pain, and analgesic/opioid use. Safety endpoints included adverse events and changes in BMD.
Of 1261 randomized patients, 1044 completed the pivotal studies, 802 enrolled in the LTE, 681 completed 52 weeks of treatment, and 501 completed 104 weeks of treatment. Demographics and baseline characteristics of the extension population were consistent with those of the original randomized population. Among patients randomized to relugolix CT at pivotal study baseline who continued in the LTE (N = 277), sustained improvements in endometriosis-associated pain were demonstrated through 104 weeks. The proportion of responders at Week 104/EOT for dysmenorrhea and NMPP was 84.8% and 75.8%, respectively. Decreases in dyspareunia and improvement in function assessed by EHP-30 pain domain were also sustained over 2 years. At Week 104/EOT, 91% of patients were opioid-free and 75% of patients were analgesic-free. Relugolix CT over 104 weeks was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with that observed over the first 24 weeks. After initial least squares mean BMD loss <1% at Week 24, BMD plateaued at Week 36 and was sustained for the duration of 104 weeks of treatment. Efficacy and safety results were generally consistent in women in the placebo→relugolix CT and delayed relugolix CT groups.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study was conducted as an open-label study without a control group over the 80 weeks of the extension period. Of the 802 patients who were enrolled in this LTE study, 681 patients (84.9%) and 501 patients (62.5%) of patients completed 52 and 104 weeks of treatment, respectively. In addition, there currently are no comparative data to other hormonal medications. Finally, a third (37.4%) of the study population terminated participation early.
In conclusion, relugolix CT offers an additional option to help address an important unmet clinical need for effective, safe, and well-tolerated medical treatments for endometriosis that can be used longer-term, reducing the need for opioids and improving quality of life. The findings from this study may help support the care of women with endometriosis seeking longer-term effective medical management of their symptoms.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by Myovant Sciences GmbH (now Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH). C.M.B. reports fees from Myovant, grants from Bayer Healthcare, fees from ObsEva, and Chair of ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group (all funds went to the University of Oxford); N.P.J. reports personal fees from Myovant Sciences, during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Guerbet, personal fees from Organon, personal fees from Roche Diagnostics; S.A.-S. reports personal fees from Myovant Sciences, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from UpToDate; J.S.P., and R.B.W. are employees and shareholders of Myovant Sciences; J.C.A.F. and S.J.I. are shareholders of Myovant Sciences (but at time of publicaion are no longer employess of Myovant Sciences); M.S.A. and K.W. have no conflicts to declare; V.M. is a consultant to Myovant; L.C.G. reports personal fees from Myovant Sciences, Inc and Bayer. The authors did not receive compensation for manuscript writing, review, and revision.
NCT03654274.
在患有中重度子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的女性中,长期(长达 2 年)使用瑞戈非尼联合治疗(CT)的疗效和安全性如何?
在长达 2 年的时间里,瑞戈非尼 CT 治疗可改善子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的月经和非月经疼痛、性交困难和功能;在最初下降<1%后,骨密度(BMD)的平均值在持续治疗中保持稳定。
子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性疾病,其特征是痛经、非经期盆腔疼痛(NMPP)和性交困难,这些对受影响女性及其伴侣和家庭的生活有重大影响。SPIRIT 1 和 2 是两项为期 3 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的研究,评估了每日一次的瑞戈非尼 CT(瑞戈非尼 40mg,雌二醇 1mg,醋酸去氨加压素 0.5mg)在有子宫内膜异位症和中度至重度痛经和 NMPP 的绝经前女性(年龄 18-50 岁)中的疗效。这些试验表明,与安慰剂相比,瑞戈非尼 CT 治疗可显著改善痛经、NMPP 和性交困难,在 24 周时 BMD 仅下降<1%。
研究设计、大小、持续时间:参加这项为期 24 周的 SPIRIT 关键研究(SPIRIT 1 和 2)的开放标签、单臂、长期扩展(LTE)研究的患者接受了多达 80 周的每日口服瑞戈非尼 CT 治疗,治疗时间在 2018 年 5 月至 2023 年 1 月之间。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:完成了 24 周关键研究(SPIRIT 1 和 2 试验;Giudice 等人,2022)且符合所有入组标准的确诊为子宫内膜异位症且有中度至重度痛经和 NMPP 的绝经前女性有资格入组。根据原始随机分组在 LTE 研究中的治疗组分析了 2 年的结果:瑞戈非尼 CT、延迟瑞戈非尼 CT(瑞戈非尼 40mg 单药治疗 12 周,随后使用瑞戈非尼 CT)或安慰剂→瑞戈非尼 CT(安慰剂治疗 24 周,随后使用瑞戈非尼 CT)。LTE 研究的主要终点是第 52 周和第 104 周/治疗结束(EOT)时痛经和 NMPP 应答者的比例。应答者是指与基线相比,特定疼痛类型的数字评定量表(NRS)评分(0=无痛,10=想象中最痛)有临床意义的降低(降低≥2.8 分用于痛经,降低≥2.1 分用于 NMPP)且未增加镇痛药使用的患者。痛经的临床意义阈值定义为 2.8 分,NMPP 的临床意义阈值为 2.1 分。次要疗效终点包括基线时子宫内膜异位症健康状况-30(EHP-30)疼痛域评分、日常生活活动(功能)受子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛影响的程度、痛经、NMPP、性交困难和总体盆腔疼痛的 NRS 评分以及镇痛药/阿片类药物的使用情况。安全性终点包括不良事件和骨密度变化。
在 1261 名随机患者中,有 1044 名完成了关键研究,802 名入组了 LTE,681 名完成了 52 周的治疗,501 名完成了 104 周的治疗。扩展人群的人口统计学和基线特征与原始随机人群一致。在关键研究基线时继续接受瑞戈非尼 CT 治疗的继续接受瑞戈非尼 CT 治疗的患者(N=277)中,通过 104 周证实了子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的持续改善。第 104 周/EOT 时痛经和 NMPP 的应答者比例分别为 84.8%和 75.8%。性交困难和 EHP-30 疼痛域评分评估的功能改善也在 2 年内持续。在第 104 周/EOT 时,91%的患者不使用阿片类药物,75%的患者不使用镇痛药。瑞戈非尼 CT 治疗 104 周耐受性良好,安全性与前 24 周观察到的安全性一致。在第 24 周时,最小二乘均数骨密度丢失<1%后,骨密度平台在第 36 周,在治疗的 104 周期间保持稳定。在安慰剂→瑞戈非尼 CT 和延迟瑞戈非尼 CT 组中,疗效和安全性结果总体一致。
局限性、谨慎的原因:该研究是一项开放标签研究,在扩展期的 80 周内没有对照组。在这项 LTE 研究中,802 名入组患者中,有 681 名(84.9%)和 501 名(62.5%)患者分别完成了 52 周和 104 周的治疗。此外,目前尚无与其他激素药物的比较数据。最后,研究人群中有 37.4%的人提前终止了参与。
总之,瑞戈非尼 CT 为子宫内膜异位症的有效、安全和耐受良好的长期治疗提供了另一种选择,减少了对阿片类药物的需求并改善了生活质量。这项研究的结果可能有助于支持寻求更长期有效管理症状的子宫内膜异位症妇女的护理。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项研究由 Myovant Sciences GmbH(现为 Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH)资助。C.M.B. 报告了来自 Myovant、拜耳医疗保健公司、ObsEva 和 ESHRE 子宫内膜异位症指南小组的费用(所有资金都用于牛津大学);N.P.J. 报告了来自 Myovant Sciences、Guerbet、Abbvie、UpToDate 的个人费用;S.A.-S. 报告了来自 Myovant Sciences、Bayer、Abbvie、Roche Diagnostics 的个人费用;J.S.P.和 R.B.W. 是 Myovant Sciences 的员工和股东;J.C.A.F. 和 S.J.I. 是 Myovant Sciences 的前员工(但在发布时不再是 Myovant Sciences 的员工);M.S.A.和 K.W. 没有利益冲突;V.M. 是 Myovant Sciences 的顾问;L.C.G. 报告了来自 Myovant Sciences,Inc 和 Bayer 的个人费用。作者没有因撰写、审查和修订手稿而获得补偿。
NCT03654274。