Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者使用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗的疗效和安全性。

The efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):235-241. doi: 10.1002/clc.23305. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

Abstract

The optimal antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains to be elucidated. Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor may be inferior to dual antiplatelet therapy in patients after PCI. PubMed, EMBASE (by Ovidsp), Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to 2 October 2019. The composite of cardiovascular outcomes, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding were evaluated. Pooled outcomes were presented as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of four trials randomizing 29 089 participants were included. Compared with the dual antiplatelet therapy group (n = 14 559), the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy group (n = 14 530) significantly decreased the incidence of bleeding events (2.0% vs 3.1%; RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.84; P = .005). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (1.3% vs 1.5%; RR: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06; P = .16), myocardial infarction (2.1% vs 1.9%; RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.25; P = .46), stroke (0.6% vs 0.5%; RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67-2.07; P = .57), or stent thrombosis (0.5% vs 0.4%; RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.81-1.61; P = .44) between the two groups. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy did not show any significant difference in the adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, but markedly decreased the risk of bleeding among patients after PCI vs dual antiplatelet therapy. However, it still needs to be further confirmed due to limited data.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的最佳抗血小板治疗仍需阐明。与 PCI 后双联抗血小板治疗相比,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗可能效果较差。从数据库建立到 2019 年 10 月 2 日,对 PubMed、EMBASE(通过 Ovidsp)、Web of Science 和 The Cochrane Library 进行了检索。评估了心血管结局的复合指标、全因死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和支架血栓形成以及大出血。汇总结果以相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。共纳入四项随机分配 29089 名参与者的试验。与双联抗血小板治疗组(n=14559)相比,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗组(n=14530)显著降低了出血事件的发生率(2.0%比 3.1%;RR:0.60;95%CI:0.43-0.84;P=0.005)。全因死亡率(1.3%比 1.5%;RR:0.87;95%CI,0.71-1.06;P=0.16)、心肌梗死(2.1%比 1.9%;RR,1.06;95%CI,0.90-1.25;P=0.46)、卒中和(0.6%比 0.5%;RR,1.18;95%CI,0.67-2.07;P=0.57)或支架血栓形成(0.5%比 0.4%;RR,1.14;95%CI,0.81-1.61;P=0.44)两组间无显著差异。与双联抗血小板治疗相比,P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗在不良心脏和脑血管事件方面无显著差异,但明显降低了 PCI 后患者的出血风险。然而,由于数据有限,仍需要进一步证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验