• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛单药治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;110(2):424-431. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2226. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.2226
PMID:33668076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8359988/
Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and subsequent P2Y inhibitor monotherapy, particularly ticagrelor, is an emerging treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This meta-analysis was designed to investigate whether short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy is associated with a favorable outcome as compared with standard DAPT (1-3 months of DAPT was termed "short-term" DAPT, 6-12 months DAPT was termed "standard" DAPT). The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprising myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and net adverse clinical events (NACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause death, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Three studies comprising 26,143 patients were included. The risk of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.02, P = 0.08, I  = 22%). Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in a 20% relative risk reduction of all-cause mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.65-0.98, P = 0.03, I  = 0%) and an 18% relative risk reduction of NACE (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.71-0.94, P = 0.005, I  = 33%) as compared with standard DAPT. Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy significantly decreased the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49-0.92, P = 0.01, I  = 65%). In patients with acute coronary syndrome, short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in an unchanged ischemic risk but a significantly lower bleeding risk compared with standard DAPT. Short-term DAPT followed by ticagrelor monotherapy compared with standard DAPT resulted in a favorable safety and efficacy profile. Direct comparisons of aspirin vs. ticagrelor monotherapy following PCI are needed.

摘要

双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)及随后的 P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗,特别是替格瑞洛,是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的一种新兴治疗策略。本荟萃分析旨在探讨与标准 DAPT(DAPT 持续 1-3 个月为“短期”,DAPT 持续 6-12 个月为“标准”)相比,短期 DAPT 后替格瑞洛单药治疗是否具有更好的结局。主要结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的复合结局,包括心肌梗死、卒中和心血管死亡。次要结局包括全因死亡率和净不良临床事件(NACE;心肌梗死、卒中和全因死亡、支架血栓形成和大出血)。主要安全性结局是大出血。纳入了三项包含 26143 例患者的研究。两组治疗的 MACE 风险相似(风险比(RR)0.86,95%置信区间(CI)0.72-1.02,P=0.08,I ² =22%)。短期 DAPT 后替格瑞洛单药治疗可使全因死亡率相对风险降低 20%(RR 0.80,95%CI,0.65-0.98,P=0.03,I ² =0%),NACE 相对风险降低 18%(RR 0.82,95%CI,0.71-0.94,P=0.005,I ² =33%)。与标准 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 后替格瑞洛单药治疗显著降低了大出血风险(RR 0.67,95%CI,0.49-0.92,P=0.01,I ² =65%)。在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,与标准 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 后替格瑞洛单药治疗并未增加缺血风险,但出血风险显著降低。与标准 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 后替格瑞洛单药治疗具有良好的安全性和疗效特征。需要直接比较 PCI 后阿司匹林与替格瑞洛单药治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/46c1c63f1bd9/CPT-110-424-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/9ce950673d21/CPT-110-424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/3edb5462d565/CPT-110-424-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/41bb425f23cd/CPT-110-424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/46c1c63f1bd9/CPT-110-424-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/9ce950673d21/CPT-110-424-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/3edb5462d565/CPT-110-424-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/41bb425f23cd/CPT-110-424-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a22d/8359988/46c1c63f1bd9/CPT-110-424-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛单药治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Aug;110(2):424-431. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2226. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
Ticagrelor monotherapy after short duration of dual antiplatelet therapy compared to continued dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: an updated meta-analysis.替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Coron Artery Dis. 2024 Nov 1;35(7):590-597. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001417. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Impact of long-term ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent complex percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial.接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者在 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后长期使用替格瑞洛单药治疗的影响:来自全球领导者试验的见解。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 14;40(31):2595-2604. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz453.
4
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After a Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Standard-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis.短程双联抗血小板治疗后应用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与标准双联抗血小板治疗用于行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较:一项当代荟萃分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Sep;40(9):799-808. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00947-x.
5
Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷单药治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和患者水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):437-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0133.
6
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
7
De-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.在有和没有急性冠脉综合征的患者中,从双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗 12 个月:一项随机试验的系统评价和个体患者水平荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 7;404(10456):937-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01616-7. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
8
Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design.替卡格雷单药治疗在新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠脉综合征患者 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗后的随机评估:TICO 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
9
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Efficacy and Safety of P2Y monotherapy vs standard DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis of randomized trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中 P2Y 单药治疗与标准 DAPT 的疗效和安全性:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Aug;49(8):102635. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102635. Epub 2024 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking boundaries: Ticagrelor monotherapy in high-risk patients.突破界限:替格瑞洛单药治疗高危患者
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 20;55:101526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101526. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy following a brief DAPT vs. prolonged 12-month DAPT in ACS patients post-PCI: a meta-analysis of RCTs.替格瑞洛单药治疗与 PCI 后 ACS 患者短程 DAPT(<1 个月)与长程 12 个月 DAPT 的疗效和安全性:RCT 的荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;80(12):1871-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03747-w. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
3
Short DAPT for PCI after CABG: ready for prime time.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
2
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
3
冠状动脉旁路移植术后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期双联抗血小板治疗:准备好进入黄金时期。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Dec 2;18(11):e868-e869. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00048.
4
Low platelet reactivity in patients with myocardial infarction treated with aspirin plus ticagrelor.心肌梗死患者经阿司匹林联合替格瑞洛治疗后血小板反应低下。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jun 1;20:eAO7001. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO7001. eCollection 2022.
5
Anticoagulant Treatment Regimens in Patients With Covid-19: A Meta-Analysis.Covid-19 患者的抗凝治疗方案:荟萃分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Mar;111(3):614-623. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2504. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
6
Musk Tongxin Dripping Pills for treating Ticagrelor in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Echocardiography Combined with Untargeted Metabolomics.麝香通心滴丸治疗经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者替格瑞洛的疗效:超声心动图联合非靶向代谢组学研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 27;12:731734. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.731734. eCollection 2021.
7
A new approach to ticagrelor-based de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. A rationale for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated, multicenter clinical study.一种新的基于替格瑞洛的急性冠脉综合征后抗血小板治疗降级方法。一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、研究者发起、多中心临床研究的原理。
Cardiol J. 2021;28(4):607-614. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0056. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
Monotherapy with a P2Y inhibitor or aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with established atherosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
在已患有动脉粥样硬化的患者中,使用 P2Y 抑制剂或阿司匹林进行单一疗法的二级预防:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 May 9;395(10235):1487-1495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30315-9.
4
Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) Versus Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) for Atrial Fibrillation with Elective or Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis with a Particular Focus on Combination Type.非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)与维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)用于伴有择期或紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动:一项特别关注联合类型的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 14;9(4):1120. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041120.
5
Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin After Complex PCI.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林用于复杂 PCI 后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 19;75(19):2414-2424. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Impact of Preadmission Morphine on Reinfarction in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者入院前吗啡应用对再梗死的影响:Meta 分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jul;108(1):54-62. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1798. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
7
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?生物可吸收血管支架——死胡同还是仍为璞玉?
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 7;8(12):2167. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122167.
8
Omitting aspirin in PCI patients: Myth or reality?经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者中阿司匹林的应用:是误区还是现实?
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019 Dec;33(6):711-724. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06916-7.
9
The efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者使用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗的疗效和安全性。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Mar;43(3):235-241. doi: 10.1002/clc.23305. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
10
Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis with a particular focus on subgroups.阿司匹林用于心血管疾病一级预防:一项重点关注亚组的荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Nov 4;17(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1428-0.